Digital assessment literacy and feedback in writing classrooms among undergraduate EFL learners

Entika Fani Prastikawati, Moses Adeleke Adeoye, Rachel Toncelli, Maria Yosephin Widarti Lestari, Lusia Maryani Silitonga

Abstract


Digital technology in higher education has altered the assessment and feedback processes, specifically in the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing classroom. Although digital tools are widely used, feedback is still not as effective as it could be, partly because of the differences in the digital assessment capabilities of lecturers. This research paper focuses on this topic by exploring how the digital assessment literacy (DAL) of lecturers and the effective feedback practices (EFP) in the eyes of students are connected. This study aimed at finding out the level of DAL, the level of EFP and the extent to which DAL is a predictor of EFP in EFL writing classrooms at Universitas Persatuan Guru Republik Indonesia Semarang, Indonesia. A quantitative study with a cross-sectional survey design was used. The structured questionnaire was used to gather data on 95 undergraduate students, and the data were analysed using descriptive statistics and simple linear regression. The findings reveal that both DAL (M = 3.83) and EFP (M range = 3.63–3.82) are at high levels. More crucially, as it turned out, DAL was a powerful and statistically significant predictor of EFP (R =.74; R 2=.54; p <.001), which implies that 54.4% of the variance in feedback effectiveness is attributable to lecturers being digitally assessment literate. The paper concludes that the competence of lecturers when it comes to digital assessment is essential in improving the quality of feedback in EFL writing contexts. The study not only provides empirical evidence of the relationship between DAL and EFP but also demonstrates the importance of student perceptions in assessing instructional practices and offers suggestions to enhance digitally mediated feedback in higher education.

Keywords


digital assessment literacy; feedback practice; writing classroom

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alsowat, H. H. (2022). Hybrid learning or virtual learning? Effects on students’ essay writing and digital literacy. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(4), 872–883. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1304.20

Asamoah, D., Shahrill, M., & Abdul Latif, S. N. (2023). Towards developing classroom assessment literacy: Exploring teachers’ approaches to assessment across cultures. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2280301. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2280301

Baghit, R. (2026). Leveraging digital feedback to advance assessment for learning. European Journal of Open Education and E-Learning Studies. 11(1), 114-126.

Bashir, A., Bashir, S., Rana, K., Lambert, P., & Vernallis, A. (2021). Post-COVID-19 adaptations; the shifts towards online learning, hybrid course delivery and the implications for biosciences courses in the higher education setting. Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6, p. 711619). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.711619

Benali, M., & Mak, J. (2022). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for Teachers’ Digital Competences. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 18(3), 122-138.

Brown, G. T. L. (2024). Insights in assessment, testing, and applied measurement: 2022. Frontiers in Education (Vol. 9, p. 1488012). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1488012

Brown, G. T. L., Peterson, E. R., & Yao, E. S. (2016). Student conceptions of feedback: Impact on self‐regulation, self‐efficacy, and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(4), 606–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12126

Cheung, A., & Slavin, R. (2016). How methodological features affect effect sizes in education. Educational Researcher. 45(5), 283-292. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16656615

Chong, S. W. (2022). The role of feedback literacy in written corrective feedback research: From feedback information to feedback ecology. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2082120. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2082120

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2005). Research methods in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203224342

Dignath, C. (2016). What determines whether teachers enhance self-regulated learning? Predicting teachers’ reported promotion of self-regulated learning by teacher beliefs, knowledge, and self-efficacy. Frontline Learning Research, 4(5), 83–105. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v4i5.247

Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4

Fatima, D. N., Ehsan, M., Darazi, D. M. A., Majeed, A., & Chaudhary, A. A. (2024). The role of feedback in enhancing creative writing skills in ELT contexts. Remittances Review, 9(3), 350-368.

Febriyanti, R. H., Usman, H., Lustyantie, N., Iasha, V., & Setiawan, B. (2022). Utilizing learning management system in online writing instruction in higher education: Indonesian faculty member perspectives. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(10). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i10.5388

Laflen, A., & Smith, M. (2017). Responding to student writing online: Tracking student interactions with instructor feedback in a Learning Management System. Assessing Writing, 31, 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.003

Lailiyah, L., Ratminingsih, N. M., Utami, I. L. P., Artini, L. P., Padmadewi, N. N., & Marsakawati, N. P. E. (2022). Peer assessment-based digital literacy, EFL students’ reading competency, and engagement. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 6(4), 678–687. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v6i4.53012

Maier, U., & Klotz, C. (2022). Personalized feedback in digital learning environments: Classification framework and literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100080

Mirsanjari, Z. (2025). Enhancing assessment literacy in EAP instruction: The role of teacher development courses in overcoming systemic barriers. Language Testing in Asia, 15(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-025-00368-7

Nguyen, T. H. (2022). The effects of peer feedback on EFL students’ writing performance. Vietnam Journal of Education, 6(2), 123-136. https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2022.185

Polakova, P., & Ivenz, P. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT feedback on the development of EFL students’ writing skills. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2410101. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2410101

Prastikawati, E. F., Mujiyanto, Y., Saleh, M., & Fitriati, S. W. (2024). Teaching practicum: Does it impact to pre-service EFL teachers’ language assessment literacy? World Journal of English Language, 14(3), 242. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n3p242

Raeisi, M. R., Heidar, D. M., & Khodareza, M. (2024). Digital literacy in an EFL classroom: Does dynamic assessment benefit from the literacy?. Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies, 3(1), 37-53.

Schneider, C., & Bodensohn, R. (2017). Student teachers’ appraisal of the importance of assessment in teacher education and self-reports on the development of assessment competence. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1293002

Shabunina, V., Labenko, O., Horbachenko, A., Tsuprun, T., & Sydorenko, O. (2024). Technologies and Innovations in the Educational Process: Experience of the University of the Future. Futurity Education, 4(3), 145-168. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2024.09.25.09

Tayyebi, M., Abbasabady, M. M., & Abbassian, G.-R. (2022). Examining classroom writing assessment literacy: A focus on in-service EFL teachers in Iran. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00161-w

Teng, M. F. (2025). Metacognitive awareness and EFL learners’ perceptions and experiences in utilising ChatGPT for writing feedback. European Journal of Education, 60(1), e12811. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12811

Timmis, S., Broadfoot, P., Sutherland, R., & Oldfield, A. (2016). Rethinking assessment in a digital age: Opportunities, challenges and risks. British Educational Research Journal, 42(3), 454–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3215

Utari, Z., Sesmiarni, Z., & Syafitri, W. (2026). AI-mediated digital formative assessment, EFL writing: Validity, teacher digital literacy, ethical implications. Journal of English Language and Education, 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v11i1.1775

Venetz, M., Zurbriggen, C. L. A., & Schwab, S. (2019). What do teachers think about their students’ inclusion? Consistency of students’ self-reports and teacher ratings. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1637. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01637

Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 487662. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087

Yildiz, H., & Kuru Gonen, S. I. (2024). Automated writing evaluation system for feedback in the digital world: An online learning opportunity for English as a foreign language students. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 25(3), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1169727

Yu, K., & Dlamini, R. (Eds.). (2024). Higher education ICT integration in Africa: Readiness, implementation and trajectory. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003394877

Zhang, X., Cui, Y., Jin, H., & Gao, Y. (2026). Developing a feedback framework for English for Research and Publication Purposes (ERPP) in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 71, 101265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101265




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/e.11.2.722-736

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) Entika Fani Prastikawati, Moses Adeleke Adeoye, Rachel Toncelli, Maria Yosephin Widarti Lestari, Lusia Maryani Silitonga

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/