Feminism thoughts in 20th and 21st century literary works: A comparative study
Abstract
One of most arguable and observable social phenomena is gender inequality which is based on feminism thoughts. Considering how literature may portray human’s life along with its values, this study is purposed to elaborate and compare how feminism thoughts and gender inequality take place in various literary works. Based on the importance of feminism thoughts and gender inequality in cross cultural literature, then there is a necessity to conduct a comparative literature study which focused on feminism thoughts. This study took four kinds of literary works, namely drama, prose (short-story), movie, and poetry. Feminism approach as sociological approach was applied in this study altogether with comparative criticism and content analysis method. This study discussed how feminism thoughts got more supports and encouragement as the century progressed. By comparing literary works from 20th and 21st century, several important findings can be drawn, namely (a) feminism thoughts are getting stronger along with the progression of century, (b) feminism thoughts always oppose gender inequality as both are always found as binary oppositions in literary work, (c) both feminism and gender-inequality live through human’s values and repetitive actions, (d) personal and familial values are crucial in order to develop feminism thoughts and gender-inequality in an individual, and (e) the change of values, especially social and cultural values can bring changes in both feminism and gender inequality phenomena.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akbari, B. (2007). The comparative study of Faith in Migel D'onamono and Hafez Shirazi, Comparative Literature Journal, 2nd year, 6, Summer.
Banerjee, R. 2005. “Gender identity and the development of gender rolesâ€. In S. Ding & K. Littleton (Eds.) Children's personal and social development. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. p. 141 - 179.
Bem, S. L. 1974. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155 - 162
Bressler, C.E. (2003). Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice, 2nd edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Butler, J. (1999). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.
Fischer, Molly (3 October 2017). "Meet Rupi Kaur, author of ubiquitous Milk and Honey". Retrieved June 5th, 2018, from www.thecut.com.
Fornes, M.I. (2001). “The Conduct of Lifeâ€. Types of Drama: Plays and Contexts. 8th ed. New York: Longman, 2001. p. 1345-1358
Hollander, J.A. (2002). Resisting Vulnerability: The Social Reconstruction of Gender in Interaction. Social Problems. 49 (4), 474-496.
Hsieh, H.F. and Shannon, E.S. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15 (9): 1277-88.
Katz et all. (2005). Women and the Paradox of Inequality in the Twentieth Century. Journal of Social History, 39 (2), 65-88.
George Mason University Press. Web. Retrieved 5 February 2016.
Knafo, A., & Schwartz, S.H. (2003). Parenting and adolescents’ accuracy in perceiving parental values. Child development, 74(2), 595-611. Retrieved February 5, 2016, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.7402018.
Lahiri, J. 1999. Interpreter of Maladies. Houghton Mifflin. United states. p 12-29.
Mzezewa, Tariro (2017). "Rupi Kaur Is Kicking Down the Doors of Publishing". The New York Times. Retrieved 7 March 2018.
Justi, F. (2002). The New Philosophy and Theory in Literature; translated by A. Anuoshirvani, Comparative Literature Journal, 2nd year, 8, Summer.
MacKinnon, A.C., (1982). Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory. Signs, 7 (3), 515-544.
Morgan, E., (1975). The Erotization of Male Dominance / Female Submission. Pittsburgh: Know, Inc.
Qasim, et all. (2015). Women’s liberation: the effects of patriarchal oppression on women’s mind. International Journal of Asian Social Science. 5 (7), 382-393.
Roy, N. (2018). "Voices of the new 'Instagram poets': Love them or hate them, thy hold the stage". Financial Times. Retrieved 7 March 2018.
Taum, Y.Y. (1997). Pengantar Teori Sastra. Bogor: Penerbit Nusa Indah.
Wellek, R. and Warren, A. (1977). Theory of Literature. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc.
Wilson, Carl (2017). "Why Rupi Kaur and Her Peers Are the Most Popular Poets in the World". The New York Times. Retrieved 7 March 2018.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/e.4.2.183-193
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019