Indonesian EFL students’ reading motivation and writing achievement across gender

Ajeng Inayatul Ilahiyah, Diah Maya Andina, Punggulina Andawaty Tiven, Bambang Yudi Cahyono

Abstract


The inseparable linkage between reading and writing has gained a crucial emphasis on language learning.  It has been regarded as a constructive issue for the improvement in teaching English skills. However, little attention is given to the underlying relationship between students’ motivation in reading and their achievement in writing.  This current research aimed at the correlation between students' reading motivation and their writing achievement across gender. It involved 50 third-year EFL students enrolled essay writing course divided into two classes in the ELT department. The quantitative data were collected through the use of the questionnaire on motivation in reading. Correlation analysis completed using Pearson product-moment revealed that the students' motivation in reading significantly positive influences their writing scores. It described that changes in students' reading motivation are a very weak correlation with the changes in their writing score. Another finding demonstrated that female and male students’ reading motivation and their writing achievement are significantly different. It signified that the differences correlation coefficient of both male and female students. Finding teaching implication is one of the areas that future researchers are suggested to investigate. Regarding the research findings, it indicates that there are more extensive areas offered for further studies in the relationship between reading and writing.

Keywords


Reading motivation; writing achievement; gender

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agustrianti, S., Cahyono, B. Y., & Laksmi, E. D. (2016). Indonesian EFL Students' Motivation in English Learning and their Literacy Skills across Gender. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 5 (4) , 219-227

Bandura, A. (1986). Social learning theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Capen, R. (2010). The role of the teacher and classroom environment in reading motivation. Illinois Reading Council Journal, 38(4), 20-26

Cohen &Louis (2000). Research methods in education. USA : Routledge Falmer

Cotterall, S. (1999). Key variables in languagelearning: What do learners believe about them? System, 27(4), 493–513.

Farahzad, F. & Emam, A. (2010). Reading-writing Connection in EAP Courses: Implications and Application. Journal of Language Teaching and Research,1, (5), 596 –604

Faigley, L. (1990). Competing theories of process: A critique and a proposal. In: R. L. Graves (Ed.), Rhetoric and composition (pp. 38–53). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann

Fidelia,O. (2015). Gender in Students’ Achievement in English Essay Writing Using Collaborative Instructional Strategy. International Journal of English Language Education, 3 (1)

Guthrie, J., Wigfield, A., & VonSecker, C. (2000) Effects of Integrated Instruction on Motivation and Strategy Use in Reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 331-341

Graham, Steve & Harris, Karen & Chambers, A.B. (2016). Evidence-based practice and writing instruction A review of reviews. Handbook of writing research. 211-226.

Hairston, M. (1990). The winds of change: Thomas Kuhn and the revolution in the teaching of writing. In: R. L. Graves (Ed.), Rhetoric and composition (pp. 3–15). Portsmouth, Heinemann.

Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language

Hornby, A.S. (2004). Oxford advanced learner's dictionary. London: Oxford University Press

Hedge, T. (1991). Writing. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.

Keller, J. (2000). How to Integrate Learner Motivation Planning into Lesson Planning: The ARCS Model Approach. Paper presented at VII Semanario, Santiago, Cuba.

Larrivee, B. (2006). Developing Cultural Literacy through the Writing Process. USA: Longwood Professional Book.

Marinak, B., Malloy, J., & Gambrell, L. (2010). Engaging readers:

Research based practices that nurture the motivation to read. The International Journal of Learning,17(5), 503-511

Nunan, D. (1999). Second English Teaching and Learning. Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.

Roeve., Phakiti. (2017). Quantitative Research For Second Language Research. USA:Routledge

Saville-Troike, M. (2006). Introducing second language acquisition. USA: Cambridge University Press.

Silva, T. and Nicholls, J.G. (1993). College Students as Writing Theories: Goals and Beliefsabout the Causes of Success. Journal of Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 1-13.

Tavares, R. C. (1990) The connection between reading and writing: theoretical foundations and some techniques. Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies

Weis, M., Heikamp, T., and Trommsdorff, G. (2013). Gender Differences in School Achievement: The Role of Self-regulation. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00442.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/e.4.2.119-131

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

EduLite Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture is published by Language and Communication Science Faculty (former Language Faculty), Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (UNISSULA), Indonesia, in collaboration with Persaudaraan Dosen Republik Indonesia (PDRI).

Contact us: EduLite Journal of English Education, Literature and CultureJl. Raya Kaligawe Km.4, PO BOX 1054/SM Semarang 50112. Email: reviews_edulite@unissula.ac.id.