Bringing multiliteracies into process writing approach in ELT classroom: Implementation and reflection

Salim Nabhan

Abstract


Designing new pedagogy in response to the advancement of technology that requires the integration of literacy has became the issue in ELT classroom. What is more, the conception of teaching English skills, including writing, is not merely limited  to the language skills target but also how the learners become multiliterate in facing todays’ world. This article puts forward the framework of multiliteracies that is integrated in process writing approach to bridge the gap between literacy education and writing pedagogy. This study aims at investigating the enactment of the incorporation of multiliteracies with process writing approach and to explore the learners’ reflection toward the use of the framework in their writing practices. The data were taken from online surveys, the participants’ reflection, observation, and focus group discussion in the end of the study. Researcher used qualitative analysis with embedded quantitative data. The proposed framework was delivered to pre-service teachers (PST) in English Writing subject at the English Language Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya, Indonesia. Step by step procedures in process writing approach were incorporated with multiliteracies along with some activities used in teaching writing. Findings indicated that implementing the framework in teaching writing provides PSTs with the opportunities to embrace the multiple modes of meaning making and digital technology in writing, produce texts, and present them in multimodal and creative ways. In addition, despite several challenges in its implementation, the activities helped to improve the writing skill, decrease the chance of plagiarism, and increase the authentic writing. Finally, PSTs were motivated to enhance their digital literacy used in writing practices. As a result, the study suggests that multiliteracies had a space in the teaching writing skill following the guided procedures in process writing approach. 

Keywords


multiliteracies; multimodality; process writing approach

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ajayi, L. (2012). How teachers deploy multimodal textbooks to enhance English language learning. TESOL Journal, 6(1), 16–35.

Alodwan, T. A. A., & Ibnian, S. S. K. (2014). The effect of using the process approach to writing on developing university students’ essay writing skills in EFL. Review of Arts and Humanities, 3(2), 139–155.

Álvarez, J. (2016). Meaning making and communication in the multimodal age : ideas for language teachers. Colombian Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 98–115. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.14483/calj.v18n1.8403 Abstract

Cloonan, A. (2010). Technologies in literacy learning: A case study. E-Learning and Digital Media, 7(3), 248–257. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2010.7.3.248

Coffin, Caroline; Curry, Mary jane; Goodman, Sharon; Hewings, Ann; Lillis Theresa M.; Swann, J. (2003). Teaching academic writing in European higher education. Retrieved from http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=197828

Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). "Multiliteracies ”: New literacies , new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 164–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800903076044

Ganapathy, M. (2016). The effects of using multimodal approaches in meaning-making of 21st century literacy texts among ESL students in a private school in Malaysia. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(2), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.2p.143

Greco, D. C. (2015). Multiliteracies : Bringing multimodality into schools (State University of New York). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/ehd_theses/630%0A

Harmer, J. (2004). How to teach writing. England: Pearson Education Limited.

Hasan, K., & Akhand, M. M. (2010). Approaches to writing in EFL/ESL context : Balancing product and process in writing class at tertiary level. Journal of NELTA, 15(1–2), 77–88.

Mackey, A. (2005). Second language reseacrh: Methodology and design. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Nabhan, S. (2016). The process approach to improve students’ writing ability in English education department University of PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya. Jembatan Merah, 13(June), 1–15.

Nabhan, S., & Hidayat, R. (2018). Investigating literacy practices in a university EFL context from multiliteracies and multimodal perspective : A case study. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(6), 192–199. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.6p.192

NLG. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies : Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.

Nordin, S. M., & Mohammad, N. (2006). The best of two approaches: Process/Genre based approach to teaching writing. The English Teacher, XXXV, 75–85. Retrieved from http://www.melta.org.my/ET/2006/2006_6.pdf

Rajendram, S. (2015). Potentials of the multiliteracies pedagogy for teaching English language learners ( ELLs ): A review of the literature. Critical Intersection in Education: An OISE/UT Students’ Journal, 3, 1–18.

Sánchez, A. C. (2017). A multimodal concept map approach to L2 writing : Emancipating non-native English students. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 3(4), 234–237. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlll.2017.3.4.139

Sewell, W. C., & Denton, S. (2011). Multimodal literacies in the secondary English classroom. English Journal, 100(5), 61–65. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23047804

Smith, A. M. (2014). Multimodal literacy in the English / language arts classroom : Meeting standards and remaining relevant in the 21st century (The College at Brockport: State University of New York). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/ehd_theses

Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2006). Approaches to teaching second language writing. Language Institute Journal, 3, 1–26.

Vagias, W. (2006). Likert-type scale response anchors. Clemson International Institute for Tourism & Research Development, Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Managament. https://doi.org/10.1525/auk.2008.125.1.225

Walsh, M. (2010). Multimodal literacy : What does it mean for classroom practice ? Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 33(3), 211–239.

Warner, C., Richardson, D., & Lange, K. (2019). Realizing multiple literacies through game-enhanced pedagogies : Designing learning across discourse levels. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 11(1), 8–29. https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw.11.1.9

Yeh, H.-C. (2018). Exploring the perceived benefits of the process of multimodal video making in developing multiliteracies. Language Learning and Technology, 22(2), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.125/44642




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/e.4.2.156-170

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

EduLite Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture is published by Language and Communication Science Faculty (former Language Faculty), Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (UNISSULA), Indonesia, in collaboration with Persaudaraan Dosen Republik Indonesia (PDRI).

Contact us: EduLite Journal of English Education, Literature and CultureJl. Raya Kaligawe Km.4, PO BOX 1054/SM Semarang 50112. Email: reviews_edulite@unissula.ac.id.