AI Chatbots in Mathematics Learning: Analyzing the Effectiveness of ChatGPT in Primary Schools
Abstract
This study aims to analyse the effectiveness of using Photomath application in learning mathematics at SDN 01 Sugih Waras Belitang Mulya OKU Timur. The focus of the research includes the impact of the application on students' understanding, teachers' teaching strategies, and challenges and solutions in its implementation. The research method used was descriptive qualitative with data collection techniques through observation, interviews, and documentation involving students, teachers, and principals. The results showed that the use of Photomath helps students in solving mathematics problems faster and understand the solution steps systematically. However, it was found that 40% of students showed dependence on the application without understanding the concepts deeply. Teachers face challenges in balancing the utilisation of technology with traditional learning methods, especially in preventing students from only relying on the app to get answers. In addition, limited access to devices and the internet is a major obstacle in the implementation of Photomath in schools. To optimise the utilisation of Photomath, several strategies have been implemented, such as group discussions, inquiry-based learning approach, as well as self-evaluation of understanding after using the application. Teachers also emphasised the need for additional training so that they are better prepared in integrating technology in learning. This study concludes that although Photomath has the potential.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
M.Y. Manuel, M. Aini, and T.P. Agustina, “Persepsi dan Sikap Siswa Terhadap Penggunaan Artificial Intelligence,” 47–59 (2023).
U. Nasiba, “Brankas Rahasia: Media Pembelajaran Numerasi Berbasis Berpikir Komputasi untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah,” J. Didakt. Pendidik. Dasar 6(2), 521–538 (2022).
A. Shabur, M. Amadi, and K. Hikmah, “Persepsi Mahasiswa Tentang Pemanfaatan Teknologi AI dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab di Perguruan Tinggi Islam Indonesia,” J. Educ. Res. 0738(2), 292–301 (2023).
R. Melisa, A. Ashadi, A. Triastuti, S. Hidayati, A. Salido, P.E. Luansi Ero, C. Marlini, Z. Zefrin, and Z. Al Fuad, “Critical Thinking in the Age of AI: A Systematic Review of AI’s Effects on Higher Education,” Educ. Process Int. J. 14, (2025).
W. Ariqo, E. Rizal, and Y. Winoto, “Analisis Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan ChatGPT dalam Penulisan Karya Publikasi Ilmiah : Manfaat dan Tantangan,” 6(1), 64–86 (2025).
A. Bozkurt, “GenAI et al.: Cocreation, Authorship, Ownership, Academic Ethics and Integrity in a Time of Generative AI,” Open Prax. 16(1), 1–10 (2024).
B. Pepin, N. Buchholtz, and U. Salinas, A Scoping Survey of ChatGPT in Mathematics Education (Springer International Publishing, 2025).
A.K.P.N. Rosliana Harahap, Yumira Simamora, Nur Ainun Lubis, Bettri Yustinaningrum, “The Role of ChatGPT in Education: Applications, Challenges: Insights From a Systematic Review,” J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res. 24(2), 1–30 (2025).
J. Dempere, K. Modugu, A. Hesham, and L.K. Ramasamy, “The impact of ChatGPT on higher education,” Front. Educ. 8(September), (2023).
S. Schorcht, N. Buchholtz, and L. Baumanns, “Prompt the problem – investigating the mathematics educational quality of AI-supported problem solving by comparing prompt techniques,” Front. Educ. 9(May), 1–15 (2024).
A. Mufakhrasy, and B. Al Adawiyah, “Pengaruh Penggunaan Artificial Intelligence AI dalam Pembelajaran dan Dunia Pendidikan,” 9, 5631–5634 (2025).
D. Pebriana, and A.I. Imami, “Eksplorasi kreativitas matematis: Menganalisis pemahaman pola bilangan siswa SMP,” JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Mat. Inov. 7(1), 49–60 (2024).
I. Ikhsan, P. Artasoma, E. Karliani, and A. Sunarno, “Analisis Penggunaan AI ( Artificial Intelligence ) dalam Menunjang Proses Pembelajaran di Kelas IX SMP Negeri 8 Palangka Raya,” 8, 3365–3372 (2025).
K. Fuchs, and V. Aguilos, “Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Empirical Insights from Students about Using ChatGPT,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol. 13(9), 1365–1371 (2023).
A.M. Elkhatat, “Evaluating the authenticity of ChatGPT responses: a study on text-matching capabilities,” Int. J. Educ. Integr. 19(1), 1–23 (2023).
Rossa Lailatul Fitri, “Implementasi AI (ChatGPT) dalam Pengerjaan,” 9, (2024).
K. Nikolopoulou, “Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Exploring Ways of Harnessing Pedagogical Practices with the Assistance of ChatGPT,” Int. J. Chang. Educ. 1(2), 103–111 (2024).
A. Polyportis, “A longitudinal study on artificial intelligence adoption: understanding the drivers of ChatGPT usage behavior change in higher education,” Front. Artif. Intell. 6, (2023).
Creswell John and Creswell David, Research Design, Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (2023).
Q. Xia, H. Yin, R. Hu, X. Li, and J. Shang, “Motivation, Engagement, and Mathematics Achievement: An Exploratory Study Among Chinese Primary Students,” SAGE Open 12(4), 1–13 (2022).
S.B.M.E.J. Tisdell, “QUALITATIVE RESEARCH A Guide to Design and Implementation,” Jossey-Bass A Wiley Brand One 11(1), 1–14 (2016).
V. Bra, and V. Clarke, SUCCESSFUL QUALITATIVE RESEARCH a Practi Cal Guide for Beginners (2013).
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Proceeding of ICONTESS: International Conference on Education, Technology, and Social Sciences is published by Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, Semarang, Indonesia. Jl. Raya Kaligawe Km 4 Semarang 50112, Central Java, Indonesia.