Washback of the performance-based test of reading for EFL learners

Wiyaka Wiyaka

Abstract


The effect of tests on the teaching and learning, generally known as washback, has been recognized by scholars for a long time. However, studies on washback are usually addressed for high-stakes testing. This study investigates the washback effect of low-stakes test namely performance-based test used in measuring reading skills. Such a test is low stakes because it does not bring about serious consequence on the part of the students. The subjects of the research were 10 English teachers and 50 students of junior high schools in Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia. Data were collected through semi-structured interview and a questionnaire for both the teachers and students. The results showed that performance-based test gives positive effect in reading for the EFL learners in the areas of: students’ enthusiasm in reading, reducing boredom in reading, students’ curiosity on reading text content, and students’ improvement on higher-order thinking skills. To the teachers it affects the areas of teaching methods, teaching materials, and time allotment.

Keywords


Washback effect; performance-based test; reading

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abedi, J. (2010). Performance assessments for English language learners. California: Stanford Center. Avalaible at https://edpolicy. stanford. edu/sites/default/files/events/materials/2011-06-linked-learning-performance-based-assessment. pdf (accessed 24 october 2015)

Ataç, B. A. (2012). Foreign language teachers’ attitude toward authentic assessment in language. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 8(2), 7-19.

Bachman, L. F. & Palmer, A. (1996). Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cheng, L. (2005). Changing language teaching through language testing: A washback study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chapman, D. & Snyder, C. (2000). Can high stakes national testing improveinstruction: Reexamining conventional wisdom. International Journal of Educational Development, 20, pp. 457-474.

Fatonah, S., Suyata, P., & Prasetyo, Z. K. (2013). Developing an authentic assessment model in elementary school science teaching. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(13), 50-61.

Fulcher, G., and Davidson, F. (2007). Language Testing and Assessment. Routledge: New York.

Indrawati, T. (2018). Wash-Back of English National Examination on Teaching Learning Process. RETAIN 6(3), 60-68.

Kunnan, A.J., (2014). The Companion to Language Assessment, First Edition. Edited by Antony John Kunnan.

Lee, H. (2019). What are the Effects of the Change in the Assessment Systems on the Alignment between Curriculum, Teaching and Assessment? A Case in Korean Middle Schools. The Journal of Asia TEFL Vol. 16, No. 1, Spring 2019, 91-106.

Mueller, J. (2005). The Authentic Assessment Toolbox: Enhancing Student Learning through Online Faculty Development, Vol 1, No 1. Avalaible at http//www.google.com/vol1_no1_mueller_001.pdf (accessed 5 Dec 2015)

Sabrina, A. (2016). A language assessment analysis of English national examination in Indonesia. Edulite: Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture, 1 (2), 177-196.

Shirzadi, D., & Amerian, M. (2020). Washback effects of multiple-choice, cloze and metalinguistic tests on EFL students writing. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9 (3), 536-544

Sumardi. (2017). Performance-Based Assessment as a Current Trend in ELT: Investigating its Washback Effects on Secondary-School Students Learning. Kajian Linguistic dan Sastra 2(1), 1-11. http://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/KLS/article/view/5347

Sukyadi, D., Mardiani, R. (2011). The Washback Effect of the English NationalExamination (ENE) on English Teachers’ Classroom Teaching and Students’ Learning, K@ta Vol. 13 No. 1 98-113.

Wiyaka, Prastikawati, E.F., Sodiq, J. (2016). Alternative Assessments for Reading in Senior High Schools: A Guide for Classroom Practices. CELT Journal, 16 (1), 49-66.

Yulia, Y., & Budiharti, F.R. (2019). HOTS in teacher classroom interaction: A case study. Edulite: Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture, 4 (2), 132-141.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/e.5.2.202-213

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020