Affective damage from teachers’ written corrective feedback

Gartika Pandu Bhuana, Ula Nisa El Fauziah

Abstract


Several studies believe that providing feedback on a students’ writing task offers several benefits. However, giving excessive corrections on students’ mistakes can have a negative impact on the students’ feeling. This study aims to investigate English Foreign Language students’ emotional response to the teachers’ written corrective feedback. A qualitative method was applied. The participants were 72 third grade students at an institution in Cimahi. To collect the data, a five-point Likert scale questionnaire and a semi-structured interview were applied. The results revealed that the teachers’ written corrective feedback had negative impact to the students’ feelings, especially for the students who had mid and low proficiency level in writing. It even led to the students’ demotivation. This indicates that the teachers have to consider several things before they give some written feedback as it can affect the students’ attitude in a negative way.


Keywords


teacher’s written corrective feedback; students’ emotional response

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahangari, S., & Amirzadeh, S. (2011). Exploring the teachers’ use of spoken corrective feedback in teaching Iranian EFL learners at different levels of proficiency. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29(2010), 1859–1868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.435

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009). The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback. ELT Journal, 63(3), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn043

Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001

Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547

Dowden, T., Pittaway, S., Yost, H., & McCarthy, R. (2013). Students’ perceptions of written feedback in teacher education: Ideally feedback is a continuing two-way communication that encourages progress. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(3), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.632676

Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023

Ellis, R. (2010). Epilogue: A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990544

Farjadnasab, A. H., & Khodashenas, M. R. (2017). The effect of written corrective feedback on EFL students’ writing accuracy. International Journal of Reserach in English Education, 30–42. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v6i2.401

Farrokhi, F., Zohrabi. M., & Mohammad, Azad, H. C. A. (2018). Corrective feedback and Iranian EFL learners' spoken complexity and accuracy. Teaching English Language, 12(2), 117-143. https://doi.org/10.22132/tel.2018.76934

Ferris, D. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: a response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80110-6

Flaherty, D. O. (2016). Japanese high school students ’ attitudes towards and usage of corrective feedback on their written work. The Language Teacher 40.6. https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTTLT40.6-1

Giri, R. A. (2018). CAF: a collaborative approach to providing feedback. Indonesian JELT: Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 13(2), 85–114. https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v13i2.1452

Goetz, T., Lipnevich, A. A., Krannich, M., & Gogol, K. (2018). Performance feedback and emotions. In A. A. Lipnevich & J. K. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback (pp. 554–574). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316832134.027

Goksoy, A. S., & Nazli, Ö. P. (2016). The effect of direct and indirect written corrective feedback on grammatical collocations in L2 writing. Middle East Technical University English Language Teaching Undergraduate Students Conference on 5-6 June 2016, 16–25. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/349051

Goo, J., & Takeuchi, T. (2021). Corrective feedback and affect. In The Cambridge Handbook of Corrective Feedback in Second Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 713–732). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108589789.034

Harris, L. R., Brown, G. T. L., & Harnett, J. A. (2014). Understanding classroom feedback practices: A study of New Zealand student experiences, perceptions, and emotional responses. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(2), 107–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9187-5

Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for Language Teachers (S. Michael (ed.)). Press Syndicate.

Hyland, K. (2013). Faculty feedback: perceptions and practices in L2 disciplinary writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.003

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399

Irwin, B. (2017). Written corrective feedback: student preferences and teacher feedback practices. IAFOR Journal of Language Learning, 3(2), 35–58. http://iafor.org/archives/journals/iafor-journal-of-language-learning/10.22492.ijll.3.2.02.pdf

Jayathilake, C. (2013). Correcting errors: the relative efficacy of different forms of error feedback in second language writing. English Review: Journal of English Education, 1(2), 1–12. http://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/ERJEE

Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. (2015). Likert scale: explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7, 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975

Kennedy, S. (2010). Corrective feedback for learners of varied proficiency levels: a teacher’s choices. TESL Canada Journal, 27(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v27i2.1054

Li, S. (2010). The Effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: a meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x

Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. In Studies in Second Language Acquisition (Vol. 32, Issue 2). Kean University. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990520

Mahfoodh, O. H. A. (2017). “I feel disappointed”: EFL university students’ emotional responses towards teacher written feedback. Assessing Writing, 31, 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.001

Martínez, J. D. D. (2014). An investigation into how EFL learners emotionally respond to teachers’ oral corrective feedback. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 15(2), 265. https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2013.2.a08

Palmer, C., & Bolderston, A. (2006). A brief introduction to qualitative research. Canadian Journal of Medical Radiation Technology, 37(1), 16–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0820-5930(09)60112-2

Pourdana, N., Nour, P., & Yousefi, F. (2021). Investigating metalinguistic written corrective feedback focused on EFL learners’ discourse markers accuracy in mobile-mediated context. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-021-00111-8

Sarsar, F. (2017). Student and instructor responses to emotional motivational feedback messages in an online instructional environment. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 115–127.

Saukah, A., Dewanti, D. M. I., & Laksmi, E. D. (2017). The effect of coded and non-coded correction feedback on the quality of Indonesian EFL students’ writing. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 247–252. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i2.8127

Storch, N. (2010). Critical feedback on written corrective feedback research. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119181

Swain, M. (2013). The inseparability of cognition and emotion in second language learning. Language Teaching, 46(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000486

Taufiqulloh; Yuvita; Yuliarto, I. (2016). Utilizing peer and teacher feedback in academic writing class. English Review: Journal of English Education, 4(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v4i2.331

Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x

Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.06.003

Westmacott, A. (2017). Direct vs. Indirect written corrective feedback: student perceptions. ikala, 22(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v22n01a02

Wibowo, J. A. (2018). Emotional responses of corrective feedback in teacher training class at university level. Scope : Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(01), 48. https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v2i01.1791.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/e.6.2.287-299

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Author(s)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

EduLite Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture is published by Language and Communication Science Faculty (former Language Faculty), Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (UNISSULA), Indonesia, in collaboration with Persaudaraan Dosen Republik Indonesia (PDRI).

Contact us: EduLite Journal of English Education, Literature and CultureJl. Raya Kaligawe Km.4, PO BOX 1054/SM Semarang 50112, Central Java, Indonesia. Email: reviews_edulite@unissula.ac.id.