Portfolio assessment in the frame of multi-layered peer coaching: An alternative portfolio for pre-service teachers

Siti Tarwiyah, Nuna Mustikawati Dewi, Fatah Syukur

Abstract


Literature has shown that portfolio assessment is meaningful for supporting student-teachers’ language and teaching skills. However, integrating portfolio assessment and Multi-layered Peer Coaching (MPC) is still scarcely done. To fill in this empirical void, this study elaborates the implementation of portfolio assessment in Micro Teaching class integrated with MPC. This is a case study with 22 pre-service teachers and one teacher educator as data sources. The data were collected through observation and documentation, and analyzed by using interactive model of analysis. It reveals that the artifacts of portfolio are dominated by collaboration-based products, comprising 13 artefacts. This portfolio may be developed to accommodate alternative assessment in Micro Teaching Class.


Keywords


portfolio assessment; Multi-layered Peer Coaching (MPC); pre-service teachers; Micro Teaching class

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alberth, A., Mursalim, M., Siam, S., Suardika, I. K., & Ino, L. (2018). Social media as a conduit for teacher professional development in the digital era: Myths, promises or realities?. Teflin Journal, 29(2), 293-306. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v29i2/293-306

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl Peter W Airasian, D. R., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). Anderson, L. W. (2001). Krathwohl. DR (Ed.), Airasian, PW, Cruikshank, KA, Mayer, RE, Pintrich, PR, Raths, J., & Wittrock, MC, 214. Taxonomy for assessing a revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives. https://www.uky.edu/~rsand1/china2018/texts/Anderson-Krathwohl - A taxonomy for learning teaching and assessing.pdf

Anggraeni, C. W. (2018). Promoting Education 4.0 in English for Survival Class: What are the Challenges? Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 2(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v2i1.676

Asowayan, A. A., Ashreef, S. Y., & Aljasser, H. S. (2017). The Modern Trends and Applications in the Development of Academic Staff in the University of Maryland & George Mason University. English Language Teaching, 10(10), 102. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n10p102

Bryant, S. L., & Timmins, A. A. (2002). Portfolio Assessment : Instructional Guide : Second Edition. Tai Po: Hongkong Institute of Education.

Butler, Y. G., & Yeum, K. (2016). Dialogic competence of primary school English teachers in online peer coaching: A case study in South Korea. Journal of Asia TEFL, 13(2), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2016.13.2.1.72

Collet, V. S. (2015). The Gradual Increase of Responsibility Model for coaching teachers: Scaffolds for change. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 4(4), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-06-2015-0017

Eastman, C. A. (2016). Coaching in organisations: how the use of fictional characters can develop coaching practice. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 5(4), 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-06-2016-0048

Efendi, Z., Usman, B. and Muslem, A. (2017). Implementation of portfolio assessment in teaching English writing. English Education Journal (Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Semarang), 8(2), 187–198.

Fitriah. (2018). The role of technology in teachers’ creativity development in english teaching practices. Teflin Journal, 29(2), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v29i2/177-193

Gallagher, T. L., & Bennett, S. M. (2018). The six “P†model: principles of coaching for inclusion coaches. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 7(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-03-2017-0018

Hakim, M. L. I. (2018). Thinking maps - An effective viual strategy EFL/ESL for learners in 21st century learning. LET: Linguistics, Literature and English Teaching Journal, 8(1), 1–14.

Joh, J. (2019). Impact of Peer Feedback on Learning: A Case of EFL Teacher Trainees. The Journal of Asia Tefl, 16(4), 1103–1118.

Johns, J. L., & Van Leirsburg, P. (1992). How professionals view portfolio assessment. Reading Research and Instruction, 32(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388079209558101

Joshi, M.K., Gupta, P. & Singh, T. (2015). Portfolio-based Learning and Assessment. Indian Pediatric, 5, 232–235.

Matra, S., & Rukmini, D. (2017). Issues and Challenges of E-Portfolio in Micro Teaching Class: Students’ Perspectives. Arab World English Journal, 8(2), 238–251. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol8no2.17

Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Source Book of New Methods. In Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Mubarok, H. (2017). Students’ Perception toward the Implementation of Peer-Assessment in Writing; Before and After Revision. Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature, 17(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.24167/celt.v17i1.1136

Musarokah, S. & Egar, N. (2017). Students ’ Response s to the Application of Peer-Editing Group Correction for Cause – Effect Written Assignments. Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language, Teaching & Literature, 17(2), 197–208.

Rotherham, A. J., & Willingham, D. (2009). 21st Century Skills : The Challenges Ahead What Will It Take ? Educational Leadership, 67(1), 16–21.

Shaw, D. (2017). Accomplished teaching: Using video recorded micro-teaching discourse to build candidate teaching competencies. In Journal of Interactive Learning Research (Vol. 28).

Tarwiyah, S., Warsono, W., Linggar Bharati, D. A., & Sutopo, D. (2018). Professional Learning through Coaching: toward the Enhancement of the Teachers’ Pedagogical Competence. Arab World English Journal, 9(4), 407–419. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no4.30

Valencia, S.W. & Calfee, R. (1991). The Development and Use of Literacy Portfolios for Students, Classes, and Teachers. Applied Measurement in Education, 4(4), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame0404

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research design and method. New Delhi: Sage Publication.

Yusuf, Y. Q., Silviyanti, T. M., & Tauhidah, R. (2016). Looking Into the Efl Students Type of Feedbacks on Peer Correction Activity. Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature, 16(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.24167/celt.v16i1.563




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/e.6.2.270-286

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Siti Tarwiyah, Nuna Mustikawati Dewi, Fatah Syukur

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/