Negotiating Islamic Marriage Values in the Digital Age: An Analysis of Generation Z Muslims through the Lens of Maqashid al-Usrah

Nur Fadhilah*    -  Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim, Malang, Indonesia
Siti Masruchah    -  Universitas Islam Malang, Indonesia
Mazro'atus Sa'adah    -  Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel, Surabaya, Indonesia
Nuril Hidayati  -  Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Wasil, Kediri, Indonesia
Hamadah Ashfiya    -  University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.30659/jua.v9i1.48228
Digital platforms have increasingly reshaped the ethical and relational landscape of Muslim youth, raising concerns about how online environments influence their understanding of Islamic values, particularly in relation to marriage. In response to this issue, the present study investigates how Muslim Generation Z interprets and negotiates Islamic marital ideals within the digital sphere, focusing on TikTok as a contested arena for ethical and religious discourse. Guided by Jamaluddin Athiyah's framework of maqashid al-usrah, the research explores how Muslim Generation Z constructs and represents marriage values—including affection and mercy, financial maintenance, protection from harm, and justice within the household—and how algorithmic mediation influences these interpretations. Employing a qualitative design that combines netnography, discourse analysis, and in-depth interviews with 15 informants, this study integrates digital observations and documentary evidence. The findings reveal that TikTok serves both as a platform for ethical affirmation and as a site of normative distortion: while affection and mercy are expressed through acts of care, financial anxieties and distorted portrayals of patience risk normalising injustice. The novelty of this study lies in the application of maqashid al-usrah to digital ethnography, offering new insights into the intersection of Islamic ethics and algorithmic culture. Scientifically, it contributes to the field of Islamic family law studies by demonstrating the adaptability of maqashid-based frameworks to digital contexts. The study recommends promoting digital literacy rooted in Islamic ethics to strengthen family resilience and safeguard moral integrity in the digital age.

Keywords: Digital Religiosity; Islamic Family Law; Generation Z; Maqashid al-Usrah; TikTok

  1. Alias, Muhammad Nazir, Muhammad Najib Abdullah, Mohd Sham Kamis, Akhmad Jazuli Afandi, and Nursyahidah Alias. “SCIENTIFIC APPROACH AS THE BASIS FOR THE FORMATION OF MAQĀṢID AL-SHARĪ‘AH CONCEPT AND PRINCIPLES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY.” Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law 12, no. 2 (2024): 350–63. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol12no2.568.
  2. Alkiek, Tesneem. “Spousal Harm in the Mālikī Law School: Evidence and Procedure.” Islamic Law and Society, November 23, 2023, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-bja10049.
  3. Athiyyah, Jamaluddin. Nahwa Taf`iil Maqashid Al-Syari`ah. Daar Al-Fikr, 2002.
  4. Attia, Gamal Eldin. Towards Realization of the Higher Intents of Islamic Law: Maqashid al-Syariah – A Functional Approach. International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2007. https://iiit.org/wp-content/uploads/Towards-Realization-of-the-Higher-Intents-of-Islamic-Law-Maqasid-Al-Shariah-A-Functional-Approach.pdf.
  5. Begum, Mohamed Sulthan Ismiya, Indriaty Ismail, Zul’azmi Yaakob, Ahamed Sarjoon Razick, and Mohamed Mahroof Ali Abdullah. “Gender Equity in Muslim Family Law: Modern and Contemporary ‘Ulamā’s View.” Al-Ahkam 34, no. 2 (2024): 221–56. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2024.34.2.20773.
  6. Discetti, Roberta, and Valerie Anderson. “The Value of Netnography for Research in HRD.” Human Resource Development Review 22, no. 1 (2023): 59–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843221137506.
  7. El Sayed, Fatima, and Nader Hotait. “Exploring the Role of TikTok for Intersectionality Marginalized Groups: The Case of Muslim Female Content Creators in Germany.” Frontiers in Political Science 6 (November 2024): 1496833. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1496833.
  8. Erstad, Ola, Kristinn Hegna, Sonia Livingstone, Oana Negru-Subtirica, and Mariya Stoilova. “How Digital Technologies Become Embedded in Family Life across Generations: Scoping the Agenda for Researching ‘Platformised Relationality.’” Families, Relationships and Societies 13, no. 2 (2024): 164–80. https://doi.org/10.1332/20467435Y2024D000000023.
  9. Fadhilah, Nur. Pernikahan Usia Anak Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Ketahanan Keluarga. Vol. 1. Akademia Pustaka, 2020. http://repo.uinsatu.ac.id/18636/.
  10. Fadhilah, Nur, and Muhammad Nurravi Alamsyah. “Reinterpreting Financial Responsibilities in Islamic Marriage A Maqasid Al-Usrah Perspective.” Al-Syakhsiyyah: Journal of Law and Family Studies 7, no. 1 (2025): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.21154/syakhsiyyah.v7i1.
  11. Fikri, Mursyid, Abbas, M. Ilham Muchtar, Darlius, and Dzulkifli Al-Amin. “Emergence of Digital Matrimony: Exploring Islamic Legal Responses to Metaverse Marriages.” Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization 14, no. 2 (2024): 246–62. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.142.15.
  12. Firdaus, Firdaus, Ismail Ismail, Busyro Busyro, Endri Yenti, and Mohd Nasran Mohamad. “Post-Divorce Child’s Nafaqah Māḍiyah: An Analysis of the Shifting from Fulfilment to the Assertion of Ownership Rights.” Al-Ahkam 33, no. 1 (2023): 45–62. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2023.33.1.14566.
  13. Guetler, Vivian. “Machine Habitus: Toward a Sociology of Algorithms.” Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews 52, no. 5 (2023): 415–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/00943061231191421.
  14. Güney, Necmeddin. “Maqāsid Al-Sharī‘a in Islamic Finance: A Critical Analysis of Modern Discourses.” Religions 15, no. 1 (2024): 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15010114.
  15. Hotait, Nader, and Fatima El Sayed. “Beyond the Hijab: Performing Religious Identity on TikTok.” Social Compass 72, no. 2 (2025): 204–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/00377686251340897.
  16. Ilomäki, Liisa, Minna Lakkala, Veera Kallunki, et al. “Critical Digital Literacies at School Level: A Systematic Review.” Review of Education 11, no. 3 (2023): e3425. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3425.
  17. Inanoglu, Hale. “Moral Careers of Muslim College Students: How I Became a Better Muslim through TikTok.” Review of Religious Research, June 26, 2025, 0034673X251348214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034673X251348214.
  18. Ionescu, Claudiu Gabriel, and Monica Licu. “Are TikTok Algorithms Influencing Users’ Self-Perceived Identities and Personal Values? A Mini Review.” Social Sciences 12, no. 8 (2023): 465. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12080465.
  19. Izharuddin, Alicia. “‘Redha Tu Ikhlas’: The Social–Textual Significance of Islamic Virtue in Malay Forced Marriage Narratives.” Religions 12, no. 5 (2021): 310. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12050310.
  20. Jones, Rodney H. “Commentary: Critical Digital Literacies as Action, Affinity, and Affect.” TESOL Quarterly 56, no. 3 (2022): 1074–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3153.
  21. Juliana, Juliana, Annisa Sabilla Limayurid, Fitranty Adirestuty, Ahmad Ajib Ridlwan, Sylva Alif Rusmita, and Shafinar Ismail. “Intention to Buy Halal Food through the ShopeeFood Application on Generation Z Muslims.” Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, ahead of print, January 9, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-04-2023-0120.
  22. Kapsch, Patrick Heiberg. “Exploring User Agency and Small Acts of Algorithm Engagement in Everyday Media Use.” Media International Australia 183, no. 1 (2022): 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X211067803.
  23. Khotimah, Umi Khusnul. “Islamic Legal Analysis on the Protection of Vulnerable Age Groups from Online Gender-Based Violence (OGBV) in Indonesia.” Journal of Ecohumanism 3, no. 8 (2024). https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.5349.
  24. LeBaron‐Black, Ashley B., Matthew T. Saxey, Casey J. Totenhagen, et al. “Financial Communication as a Mediator between Financial Values and Marital Outcomes.” Family Relations 72, no. 4 (2023): 1974–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12786.
  25. Lin, Shuting, Zhongping Yuan, Gengfeng Niu, Cuiying Fan, and Xin Hao. “Family Matters More Than Friends on Problematic Social Media Use Among Adolescents: Mediating Roles of Resilience and Loneliness.” International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 22, no. 5 (2024): 2907–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-023-01026-w.
  26. Mahamid, Fayez, Muayad Hattab, and Denise Berte. “Palestinian Law to Protect Family and Prevent Violence: Challenges with Public Opinion.” BMC Public Health 23, no. 1 (2023): 412. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15276-9.
  27. Marceau, Kristine, Carlyn Kimiecik, Yumary Ruiz, et al. “Emerging Ideas. Families Together: Supporting Family Resilience during the COVID ‐19 Pandemic.” Family Relations 72, no. 3 (2023): 665–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12781.
  28. Marston, Kate. “Relationshipgoals: Fantasies of the Good Life in Young People’s Digitally-Networked Peer Cultures.” Journal of Youth Studies 27, no. 2 (2024): 303–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2022.2124106.
  29. Mohadi, Mawloud. “NORMATIVE ISLAMIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF FAMILIES AND KINSHIP THROUGH MAQASID PERSPECTIVES: A COMPREHENSIVE LITERATURE STUDY.” Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law 11, no. 2 (2023): 290–309. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol11no2.459.
  30. Musarrofa, Ita, Husnul Muttaqin, and Ridha Amaliyah. “The Problems of Islamic Family Law in the Digital Era and Its Relevance to Renewal of the Compilation of Islamic Law.” Jurnal Hukum Islam 22, no. 1 (2024): 89–124. https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi_v22i1_4.
  31. Nadia, Zunly, and Niswatin Faoziah. “Gender Equality Within Family in Islamic Perspective: Insights From the Hadiths of Ummul Mukminin.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur an Dan Hadis 25, no. 1 (2024): 161–86. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v25i1.5260.
  32. Prabowo, Alfian D A, Muhammad Chirzin, Fuad Nashori, and Mohammad S A Widigdo. “Marriage, Divorce in Islamic Psychological Analysis and Maqashid Sharia.” Petita Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah 9, no. 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v9i2.321.
  33. Putri, Angelica Maylani, and Anita Puji Astutik. “Tiktok as a Generation-Z Islamic Religious Learning Media During the Covid-19 Pandemic.” Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam 18, no. 2 (2021): 273–94. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.2021.182-04.
  34. Sattar, Tehmina, Saeed Ahmad, and Muhammad Asim. “Intimate Partner Violence Against Women in Southern Punjab, Pakistan: A Phenomenological Study.” BMC Women S Health 22, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02095-0.
  35. Schüßler, Elke, Will Attwood-Charles, Stefan Kirchner, and Juliet B Schor. “Between Mutuality, Autonomy and Domination: Rethinking Digital Platforms as Contested Relational Structures.” Socio-Economic Review 19, no. 4 (2021): 1217–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwab038.
  36. Tag, Benjamin, Niels Van Berkel, Andrew W. Vargo, et al. “Impact of the Global Pandemic upon Young People’s Use of Technology for Emotion Regulation.” Computers in Human Behavior Reports 6 (May 2022): 100192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100192.
  37. Trysnes, Irene, and Ronald Mayora Synnes. “The Role of Religion in Young Muslims’ and Christians’ Self-Presentation on Social Media.” YOUNG 30, no. 3 (2022): 281–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/11033088211063368.
  38. Ulloa-López, Paola, Juan Pablo Del Alcázar Ponce, and Andrea Velásquez Benavides. “Netnography and Discourse Analysis in Digital Environments: Methodological Convergences for the Study of Virtual Communities in the Age of Algorithms.” Journal of Posthumanism 5, no. 7 (2025). https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i7.2984.
  39. Verma, Akriti, Shama Islam, Valeh Moghaddam, and Adnan Anwar. “Digital Emotion Regulation on Social Media.” Computer 57, no. 6 (2024): 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2023.3332331.
  40. Witney, Tom, Jacqui Gabb, Catherine Aicken, Salvatore Di Martino, and Mathijs Lucassen. “Configuring the Digital Relationship Landscape: A Feminist New Materialist Analysis of a Couple Relationship App.” Families, Relationships and Societies 13, no. 2 (2024): 181–97. https://doi.org/10.1332/20467435Y2024D000000015.
  41. Wu, Di. “More than a Solo Method: Netnography’s Capacity to Enhance Offline Research Methods.” Area 54, no. 1 (2022): 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12750.
  42. Xie, Lola, Juliet Pinto, and Bu Zhong. “Building Community Resilience on Social Media to Help Recover from the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Computers in Human Behavior 134 (September 2022): 107294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107294.
  43. Yamamah, Ansari. “Discourse on Universal Religious Values: A Contemporary Paradigm from an Islamic Transitive Perspective.” Journal of Al-Tamaddun 17, no. 2 (2022): 99–112. https://doi.org/10.22452/JAT.vol17no2.8.
  44. Zhang, Xiaochen Angela, and Yoon Hi Sung. “Communities Going Virtual: Examining the Roles of Online and Offline Social Capital in Pandemic Perceived Community Resilience-Building.” Mass Communication and Society 26, no. 4 (2023): 539–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2021.1974046.
  45. Interviews
  46. P2. Personal Interview with Husband. 2025.
  47. P3. Personal Interview with Wife. 2025.
  48. P4. Personal Interview with Husband. 2025.
  49. P5. Personal Interview with Wife. 2025.
  50. P6. Personal Interview with Husband. 2025.
  51. P7. Personal Interview with Wife. 2025.
  52. P8. Personal Interview with Husband. 2025.
  53. P9. Personal Interview with Wife. 2025.
  54. P10. Personal Interview with Husband. 2025.
  55. P11. Personal Interview with Wife. 2025.
  56. P12. Personal Interview with Husband. 2025.
  57. P13. Personal Interview with Wife. 2025.
  58. P14. Personal Interview with Husband. 2025.
  59. P15. Personal Interview with Wife. 2025.
  60. Personal Interview with Wife. With P1. 2025.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 Nur Fadhilah, Siti Masruchah, Mazro'atus Sa'adah, Nuril Hidayati, Hamadah Ashfiya
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

ULUL ALBAB: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam
Published by Department of Sharia, Faculty of Islamic Studies, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang
Jl. Kaligawe Ray KM. 4 Semarang, Indonesia
Website: https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/ua
Email: jurnalululalbab@unissula.ac.id

ULUL ALBAB stats

ISSN: 2597-6168 (Print)
ISSN: 2597-6176 (Online)
DOI : 10.30659/jua

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Get a feed by atom here, RRS2 here and OAI Links here

apps