Liminality Rituals of Interfaith Families: Symbolic Interactionism and MaqÄshid Sharia Perspectives

Muhammad Chairul Huda*  -  Institut Agama Islam Negeri Salatiga, Indonesia
Ilyya Muhsin  -  Institut Agama Islam Negeri Salatiga, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.30659/jua.v5i2.20488

This study aims to determine the dynamics of life cycle liminality rituals in interfaith families in Salatiga City and their meanings. This study used a qualitative approach with socio-juridical (socio-legal) methods. This fieldwork was conducted on interfaith families in Salatiga City. The results of this study revealed that interfaith marriages in the Salatiga City people, from the perspective of symbolic interactions, involved the mind, self, and society. The actors were influenced by interactions with other individuals and tried to share meaning with society. The cognition construction of interfaith family actors paid attention to the dimensions of society that demand the legality of a marriage. In the ritual act of liminality in the life cycle, interfaith families in Salatiga City had a fairly large tolerance. It was marked by the freedom of family members to perform rituals, whether they came from tradition or religion. In the context of maqÄshid sharia, the concepts of hifdzun nafs, hifdzud dÄ«n, hifdzun nasbi wa nasl, hifdzul mÄl, and hifdzul aql could be maintained as long as there was no coercion from other parties. Thus, freedom of worship and carrying out religious rituals is absolutely necessary.

Keywords: Interfaith Families, Liminality, Ritual, Symbolic Interactionism

  1. Adriana, Iswah. “NELONI, MITONI ATAU TINGKEBAN:(Perpaduan Antara Tradisi Jawa Dan Ritualitas Masyarakat Muslim).†KARSA: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Keislaman, 2011, 238–47.
  2. Agus, Irianto Maladi. “Interaksionisme Simbolik: Pendekatan Antropologis Merespon Fenomena Keseharian.†Semarang: Gigih Pustaka Mandiri, 2015.
  3. Amri, Aulil. “Perkawinan Beda Agama Menurut Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Islam.†Media Syari’ah: Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam Dan Pranata Sosial 22, no. 1 (2020): 48–64.
  4. Annisa, Firdha. “RITUAL UNGGAHAN PADA KOMUNITAS ADAT BONOKELING (Studi Kasus Pada Komunitas Adat Bonokeling Di Kabupaten Banyumas Menggunakan Teori Liminalitas Victor Turner).†SOSIALITAS; Jurnal Ilmiah Pend. Sos Ant 8, no. 1 (2019).
  5. Aswiyati, Indah. “Makna Dan Jalannya Upacara" Puputan" Dan" Selapanan" Dalam Adat Upacara Tradisional Kelahiran Bayi Bagi Masyarakat Jawa.†HOLISTIK, Journal Of Social and Culture, 2015.
  6. Baharits, Adnan Hasan Shalih. Tanggung Jawab Ayah Terhadap Anak Laki-Laki. Gema Insani, 1996.
  7. Beech, Nic. “Liminality and the Practices of Identity Reconstruction.†Human Relations 64, no. 2 (2011): 285–302.
  8. Budiarti, Budiarti. “Ritual Massuro Baca Pada Masyarakat Bugis Tinco Bone Perspektif Maqashid Al-Syari’ah.†Al-Mizan 17, no. 2 (2021): 201–18.
  9. Campbell, Tom. Seven Theories of Human Society. Clarendon Press Oxford, 1981.
  10. Derung, Teresia Noiman. “Interaksionisme Simbolik Dalam Kehidupan Bermasyarakat.†SAPA-Jurnal Kateketik Dan Pastoral 2, no. 1 (2017): 118–31.
  11. Eck, Diana L. “What Is Pluralism.†Pluralism. Org. Available Online: Http://Pluralism. Org/Pluralism/What_is_pluralism (Accessed on 17 January 2016), 2006.
  12. Elvinaro, Ardianto, and Q Bambang. “Filsafat Ilmu Komunikasi.†Bandung: Simbiosa Reka Tama Media, 2007, 2–3.
  13. Erlisa, Ratna. “Interview.†2020.
  14. Erwin, Muhammad. Hak Atas Ruang Hidup Masyarakat Adat. Depok: Rajawali Press, 2018.
  15. Faidi, Ahmad. “Pendidikan Toleransi Terhadap Remaja Muslim Dan Kristen Di Salatiga (Studi Terhadap Perayaan Halal Bihalal Dan Natal Bersama Di Desa Pengilon Mangunsari Sidomukti Kota Salatiga).†Intiqad: Jurnal Agama Dan Pendidikan Islam 12, no. 2 (2020): 134–50.
  16. Febrianto, Muhammad Reza, and Farida Nurani. “Toleransi Dan Pluralisme: Kontribusi Budaya Indonesia Bagi Dunia,†n.d.
  17. Fitroh, Nurul. “Ritual Tingkeban Dalam Perspektif Aqidah Islam.†Universitas Islam Negeri Walisong Semarang, 2014.
  18. Forte, James A. “Symbolic Interactionism and Social Work: A Forgotten Legacy, Part 1.†Families in Society 85, no. 3 (2004): 391–400.
  19. Furinawati, Yunita, and Dhika Puspitasari. “KONSEP SEDULUR PAPAT LIMA PANCER SEBAGAI REPRESENTASI RELIGIUSITAS DALAM MASYARAKAT WONOMULYO.†In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hasil Penelitian LPPM Universitas PGRI Madiun, 112–18, 2017.
  20. Geertz, Clifford. The Religion of Java. University of Chicago Press, 1976.
  21. Hajar, M. “Model-Model Pendekatan Dalam Penelitian Hukum Dan Fiqh.†Yogyakarta: Kalimedia, 2017.
  22. Hakim, Muhammad Lutfi. “Pergeseran Paradigma Maqasid Al-Syari’ah: Dari Klasik Sampai Kontemporer.†Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 10, no. 1 (2016): 1–16.
  23. Hamdani, Hamdani. “Negara Sejahtera Dalam Perspektif Maqashid Syariah.†Al-Mabsut: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Sosial 14, no. 1 (2020): 28–41.
  24. Hidajad, Arif. “Menikah (Sebuah Pendidikan Etika Melalui Simbol Upacara Liminalitas).†PADMA 11, no. 1 (2017).
  25. Hidayat, Eko. “Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Negara Hukum Indonesia.†ASAS 8, no. 2 (2016).
  26. Huda, Muhammad Chairul. “Relasi Islam Dan Negara (Studi Politik Hukum Di Indonesia).†PAX HUMANA 6, no. 2 (2020): 155–72.
  27. Hutapea, Bonar. “Dinamika Penyesuaian Suami-Istri Dalam Perkawinan Berbeda Agama (the Dynamics of Marital Adjustment in the Interfaith Marriage).†Sosio Konsepsia: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial 16, no. 1 (2011): 101–22.
  28. Indarti, Erlyn. “Diskresi Dan Paradigma.†Pidato Guru Besar, no. November (2010).
  29. Keo, Jitro Jemryes, Wahyuni Kristinawati, and Adi Setiawan. “Dukungan Sosial, Ketangguhan Pribadi, Dan Stres Akulturasi Mahasiswa Nusa Tenggara Timur Di Salatiga.†Psikologika: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Psikologi 25, no. 1 (2020): 15–28.
  30. Kesuma, Guntur Cahaya. “Refleksi Model Pendidikan Pesantren Dan Tantangannya Masa Kini.†Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah 2, no. 1 (2017): 67–79.
  31. Koentjaraningrat. Sejarah Teori Antropologi. Jakarta: UI Press, 1978.
  32. Liunokas, Marsel Eliaser. “Perempuan Dan Liminalitas Dalam Tradisi Perkawinan Adat Di Timor Tengah Selatan.†Anthropos: Jurnal Antropologi Sosial Dan Budaya (Journal of Social and Cultural Anthropology) 6, no. 1 (2020): 114–22.
  33. Mas’ud, Muhammad Khalid. “Filsafat Hukum Islam Dan Perubahan Sosial.†Surabaya: Al-Ikhlas, 1995.
  34. Mead, George Herbert, and Cornelius Schubert. Mind, Self and Society. Vol. 111. University of Chicago press Chicago, 1934.
  35. Miles, Matthew B, A Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldaña. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage publications, 2018.
  36. Musri’ah. “Interview.†2019.
  37. NMAS, Erna Kurniawati, and Elly Esra Kudubun. “MODAL SOSIAL KELUARGA BEDA AGAMA (Studi Sosiologis Tentang Relasi Pergaulan Anak Dari Pasangan Beda Agama Di Salatiga).†Cakrawala Jurnal Penelitian Sosial 4, no. 2 (2015).
  38. Nurhanjani, Nurhanjani, and Hedi Wahyudi. “Studi Deskriptif Mengenai Dimensi Religiusitas Pada Mahasiswa Yang Melakukan Kohabitasi Di Tempat Kost X Bandung,†2019.
  39. Qoni’ah, Siti. “Interview.†2020.
  40. Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Alumni, 1996.
  41. Rahman, Syahrul, and May Listia Pika. “Mitoni: Antara Budaya Dan Agama (Studi Kasus Desa Air Panas Kec. Pendalian IV Koto).†Al FAWATIH: Jurnal Kajian Al Quran Dan Hadis 1, no. 2 (2020): 21–33.
  42. Retno, Sri. “Interview.†2020.
  43. Rifa’i, M. “Etnografi Komunikasi Ritual Tingkeban Neloni Dan Mitoni Studi Etnografi Komunikasi Bagi Etnis Jawa Di Desa Sumbersuko () Kecamatan Gempol Kabupaten Pasuruan.†ETTISAL: Journal of Communication 2, no. 1 (2017): 27–40.
  44. Risa, Risa. “Interview.†2019.
  45. Samekto, Adji. “Pergeseran Pemikiran Hukum Dari Era Yunani Menuju Postmodernisme.†Jakarta: Konstitusi Press Hlm 25 (2015).
  46. Sholikhin, Muhammad. Ritual Dan Tradisi Islam Jawa: Ritual-Ritual Dan Tradisi-Tradisi Tentang Kehamilan, Kelahiran, Pernikahan, Dan Kematian Dalam Kehidupan Sehari-Hari Masyarakat Islam Jawa. Penerbit Narasi, 2010.
  47. Siregar, Nina Siti Salmaniah. “Kajian Tentang Interaksionisme Simbolik.†Perspektif 1, no. 2 (2012): 100–110.
  48. Suteki. Desain Hukum Di Ruang Sosial. Yogyakarta: Thafa media, 2013.
  49. Suwito, N S. “Slametan Dalam Kosmologi Jawa: Proses Akulturasi Islam Dengan Budaya Jawa.†Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Budaya 5, no. 7 (2007).
  50. Syam, Nia Kurniati, Arifin Syatibi, and Moh Jibral Imperial Day. “Simbol-Simbol Dalam Komunikasi Keluarga Beda Agama.†MIMBAR: Jurnal Sosial Dan Pembangunan 31, no. 2 (2015): 419–28.
  51. Tamunu, Vico Risky, Fonny J Waani, and Selvie M Tumengkol. “Analisis Interaksionisme Simbolik Terhadap Penyimpangan Perilaku Siswa (Kajian Sosiologi Pendidikan Terhadap Pelanggaran Tata Tertib Siswa Di SMA Negeri 9 Manado).†HOLISTIK, Journal Of Social and Culture, 2018.
  52. Thohir, Mudjahirin. “Etnografi Ideasional (Suatu Metodologi Penelitian Kebudayaan).†Nusa: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Dan Sastra 14, no. 2 (2019): 194. doi:10.14710/nusa.14.2.194-205.
  53. ———. Orang Islam Jawa Pesisiran. Fasindo Press, 2006.
  54. Thomassen, Bjørn. “The Uses and Meaning of Liminality.†International Political Anthropology 2, no. 1 (2009): 5–28.
  55. Tucker, William T. “Max Weber’s Verstehen.†The Sociological Quarterly 6, no. 2 (1965): 157–65.
  56. Turner, Victor. “Frame, Flow and Reflection: Ritual and Drama as Public Liminality.†Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 1979, 465–99.
  57. ———. “The Ritual Process New York.†Cornell University Press, 1969.
  58. Umanailo, M Chairul Basrun. “Pierre Bourdieu; Menyikap Kuasa Simbol,†2018.
  59. Wahid, Abdurrahman. Islam Kosmopolitan; Nilai-Nilai Indonesia Dan Transformasi Kebudayaan. Jakarta: The Wahid Institute, 2007.
  60. WarasihPujirahayu, Esmi. “Pemikiran Hukum Spiritual Pluralistik Sisi Lain Hukum Yang Terlupakan.†Thafa Media, Yogyakarta, 2016.
  61. Warassih, Esmi. “Penelitian Hukum Interdispliner Sebuah Pengantar Menuju Sosio-Legal.†Yogyakart: Thafa Media, 2016.
  62. Weber, Max. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Simon and Schuster, 2009.
  63. Winangun, Y Wartaya. Masyarakat Bebas Struktur: Liminalitas Dan Komunitas Menurut Victor Turner. Kanisius, 1990.
  64. Woodward, Mark R. “The" Slametan": Textual Knowledge and Ritual Performance in Central Javanese Islam.†History of Religions 28, no. 1 (1988): 54–89.
  65. Wulf, Christoph. “Religion and Rituals.†Culture and Education, 2013, 25–37.
  66. Wuryani, Emy, and Sri Muryani. “MODEL KEPEMIMPINAN UNIVERSITAS KRISTEN SATYA WACANA 1956-1993.†Satya Widya 31, no. 2 (2015): 69–82.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

ULUL ALBAB: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam
Published by Department of Sharia, Faculty of Islamic Studies, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang
Jl. Kaligawe Ray KM. 4 Semarang, Indonesia
Phone: +62 821-4499-8600
Website: http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/ua
Email: jurnalululalbab@unissula.ac.id

ULUL ALBAB stats

ISSN: 2597-6168 (Print)
ISSN: 2597-6176 (Online)
DOI : 10.30659/jua

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Get a feed by atom here, RRS2 here and OAI Links here

apps