Dividend Yield as a Basis for Investment Decision Making with Dollar Cost Averaging Policy as a Moderating Variable: Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) Yieldmax Period April 2024 – April 2025
Abstract
This study examines the investment behavior of YieldMax Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs), which are financial instruments based on a synthetic covered call strategy offering high dividend yields, while also carrying substantial risks of Net Asset Value erosion and price depreciation. The main issue addressed in this study is whether high dividend yield is actually capable of improving investment performance, and whether the Dollar Cost Averaging (DCA) policy is able to moderate such relationship. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the effect of Dividend Yield on Investment Performance, measured by Holding Period Return (HPR), and to test the role of DCA as a moderating variable in YieldMax ETFs during the period of April 2024 to April 2025. This research employs a quantitative approach using back-testing simulation and panel data analysis. The sample consists of 14 YieldMax ETFs observed under two investment strategy scenarios, namely Lump-Sum Investing (LSI) and Dollar Cost Averaging (DCA), resulting in 364 balanced panel observations. The data were processed using EViews 12 with Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA). Panel model selection was conducted through the estimation of Common Effect Model (CEM), Fixed Effect Model (FEM), and Random Effect Model (REM). Since FEM could not be estimated stably, the final model was determined using the Lagrange Multiplier Test, which indicated that the Random Effect Model (REM) was the most appropriate model. The results show that Dividend Yield has a positive and significant effect on Investment Performance (HPR), therefore the first hypothesis is accepted. This finding indicates that, during the observation period, the magnitude of dividend cash flow in YieldMax ETFs contributed meaningfully to total investment returns. On the other hand, the interaction variable between Dividend Yield and DCA is not significant, indicating that DCA does not moderate the relationship between Dividend Yield and Investment Performance. These findings imply that Dividend Yield is the main determinant of investment performance in YieldMax ETFs within the observation period, while the choice of market entry strategy through DCA does not show a significant moderating role.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journals:
Fama, & French. (2001). Disappearing dividends: changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay? Journal of Financial Economics, 60(1), 3–43.
Fong, W. M. (2017). 54 Beating the Market: Dollar-Cost averaging with the Profitable DiviDenD YielD strategY Beating the Market: Dollar-Cost Averaging with the Profitable Dividend Yield Strategy.
Gavrilakis, N. , & Floros, C. (2022). he impact of heuristic and herding biases on portfolio construction and performance: the case of Greece. Review of Behavioral Finance, 436–462.
Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariative Dengan Program IBM SPSS 25 Edisi 9. 19–167.
Ghozali, I., & Ratmono, D. (2017). Analisis multivariat dan ekonometrika: teori, konsep, dan aplikasi dengan eview 10.
Gupta, H. (2015). A STUDY ON PERFORMANCE OF SENSEX AND EVALUATION OF INVESTING LUMP SUM OR MONTHLY REGULAR INVESTMENT IN EQUITY ON RISK AND RETURN FOR INVESTOR. http://www.journalijdr.com
Hadady, H., Jabid, A. W., & Amiro, S. (2023). The Effect of Dividend Yield on The Volatility of Stock Prices of IDX30 Index Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2019-2023 Period. Journal Eduvest, 4(10), 9298–9314. http://eduvest.greenvest.co.id
Israelov, R., & Lo, S. (2023). Time In vs. Timing the Market: The Advantages of Lump-Sum Investing Over Dollar-Cost Averaging EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.
Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency. TheJournalofFinance, 65–91.
Jogiyanto, H. (2017). Teori portofolio dan analisis investasi (11th ed.). BPFE.
Joshi, G., & Dash, R. K. (2024). Exchange-traded funds and the future of passive investments: a bibliometric review and future research agenda. Future Business Journal, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00306-8
Kumar, S., & Sharma, R. (2023). Comparative Analysis of ESG Indices and Conventional Indices: A Performance Evaluation Study Post-Pandemic. Ournal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 890–905.
Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2023). The Importance of Financial Literacy: Opening a New Field. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 37(4), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.37.4.137
Merkoulova, Y., & Veld, C. (2022). Investment Opportunities and Investor Behavior.
Miller, D., & White, G. (2024). Monetary Policy Shocks and Stock Market Performance: Evidence from Developed and Emerging Markets. Global Finance Journal, 60, 100–118.
Books:
Basuki, A. T., & Prowoto, N. (2016). Analisis Regresi dan Penelitian Bisnis; Dilengkapi Aplikasi SPSS dan Eviews.
Bernstein, W. J. (1992). The Intelligent Asset Allocator.
Brennan, M. J., Li, F., & Torous, W. (2005). Dollar Cost Averaging. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/53p0r65q
Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2019). Fundamentals of financial management 15th.
Chodisetty, R. S. C. M., & Babu, P. R. (2022). A Systematic Observation On Systematic Investment Plan (SIP) And Lump Sum Investment Plan(LIP) In Mutual Funds-With Special Reference to Kotak Bank Equity Fund Nippon India Equity Fund.
Eriksson, L., Fransson, P., & Landström, J. (2021). Dollar-Cost Averaging Versus Lump-Sum Investing-Evidence from Sweden.
Fabozzi, F. J. (2009). Institutional Investment Management: Equity and Bond Portofolio Strategies and Applications.
Fabozzi, F. J., & Markowitz, H. M. (2011). The Theory and Practice of Investment Management: Instruments, asset allocation, portfolio selection, and asset pricing.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jrbi.v23i2.52885
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
Jurnal JRBI Indexed by :