Analysis of Maslahah Mursalah Comparison of the Settlement of Sharia Insurance Contracts at National Sharia Arbitration Board and the Indonesian Insurance Mediation and Abitration Agency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v11i1.34091Keywords:
Agency, Arbitration, Contract, Insurance.Abstract
This paper aims to share knowledge and provide another point of view regarding the view of Maslahah Mursalah Analysis of Comparative Settlement of Sharia Insurance Contracts at National Sharia Arbitration Board and the Indonesian Insurance Mediation and Abitrase Agency. Insurance is defined as a reasonable (fair) transfer of the risk of loss, from 1 (one) entity to another entity. And to guarantee and resolve insurance disputes, of course, requires an institution that is willing to take over the risks of the community, both individual risks and group risks caused. The two institutions discussed are National Sharia Arbitration Board and Indonesian Insurance Mediation and Arbitration Agency. The problems to be discussed in this research are about how the comparison of the binding force of the decision of the National Sharia Arbitration Board and the Indonesian Insurance Mediation and Arbitration Board (Indonesian Insurance Mediation and Arbitration Agency) in the Settlement of Sharia Insurance Contract Disputes, and how the dispute resolution by Indonesian Insurance Mediation and Arbitration Agency and National Sharia Arbitration Board and the Maslahah Mursalah review of the nonlitigation mediation. In this research the author uses normative legal research. The research uses literature as a reference, namely books or journals and supporting materials that discuss these two institutions. And the results of the research in this paper are the two institutions intended to resolve insurance disputes, namely National Sharia Arbitration Board and Indonesian Insurance Mediation and Arbitration Agency. Disputes are resolved by National Sharia Arbitration Board if the dispute cannot be resolved by internal deliberation by the insurance company. While disputes are resolved by Indonesian Insurance Mediation and Arbitration Agency, namely if the insured has a dispute with the insurance company and cannot reach a settlement of the dispute. The two institutions have permanent legal force.
References
Books:
Adolf, Huala, (1994), Hukum Arbitrase Komersial Internasional, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada
BMAI, (2006), Peraturan Badan Mediasi Asuransi Indonesia, Jakarta: BMAI.
Hamidi. M. Luthfi, (2003), Jejak – jejak Ekonomi Syariah, Jakarta: Senayan Abidi Publishing, Cet. Ke-1.
Hidayanto, B. I. (2016). Implementasi kompilasi hukum ekonomi syariah pada putusan nomor: 3333/Pdt. G/2014/PA. BL. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim.
Hadiati, M., & Tampi, M. M. (2017). Efektivitas Mediasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen oleh Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) di DKI Jakarta. Jakarta: Prioris.
Mulhadi, (2017), Dasar-Dasar Hukum Asuransi, Depok: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Nugroho, S. A. (2019). Manfaat Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Prenada Media.
Soemitro, 1998, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia
Sugono. Dendy dkk, (2008), Kamus Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Sabiq. Sayyid, (1987), Fiqh Sunnah II, Bandung: PT Al-Maa’rif.
Widjaya, Gunawan, dan Ahmad Yani, (2002), Hukum Arbitrase: Seri Hukum Bisnis, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Winardi, (1984), Kamus Ekonomi (Inggris-Indonesia), Bandung: Penerbit Alumni.
Journals:
Nurhayati, N. (2019). Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Hukum Ekonomi Islam. Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah.
Prakoso, A. L. (2017). Tinjauan Terhadap Arbitrase Syariah Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Bidang Perbankan Syariah. Jurnal Jurisprudence.
Yunus. Ahsan, (2011), Analisis Yuridis Sifat Final dan Mengikat (Binding) Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jurnal Konstitusi Volume III Nomor 2.
Regulation:
Law Number 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.
- Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
- The copyright of this document is owned by Journal Master of Notarial Law (M.Kn) UNISSULA and is protected by law