A CLINICAL-RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF CROWN AND NON-METAL POST RESTORATION AFTER ROOT CANAL TREATMENT USING MODIFIED STRINDBERG CRITERIA IN ACADEMIC DENTAL HOSPITAL YOGYAKARTA

Erma Sofiani*  -  Faculty of Medicine and Health Science Muhammadiyah University Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Jihan Nadhirah Natasya  -  Faculty of Medicine and Health Science Muhammadiyah University Yogyakarta, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.30659/odj.9.0.102-108

Background: Root canal treatment failure can be caused by periapical lesions and inadequate restorations such as post restorations. It showed that comprehensive evaluation, such as clinical or radiographic evaluation, is needed to observe the healing of endodontically treated dental and intra-radicular post-condition, especially fiber post and fiber reinforced composite (FRC). This research aims to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of endodontically treated teeth restored with single crown restoration using a non-metal post.
Methods: This study is a cross-sectional design and descriptive observation of evaluating endodontically treated teeth. 72 samples were collected from medical records, and radiographs of endodontically treated patients; then, scoring was carried out to categorize the treatment outcome using modified Strindberg criteria.
Results: Endodontically treated dental restoration with non-metal post evaluation showed 63,9% teeth categorized as uncertain, followed by 36,1% teeth categorized as success and 0% in the failure category.
Conclusion: The result of this study suggests that a longer follow-up period will be needed to achieve a more stable evaluation result.

Keywords: Endodontically treated teeth; Fiber post; FRC post; Strindberg criteria modification

  1. Cohen S. Cohen’s pathways of the pulp. Eleventh edition. Missouri: Elsevier, 2016.
  2. Garcia PP, Wambier LM, de Geus JJ, et. al. Do anterior and posterior teeth treated with post-and-core restorations have similar failure rates? A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. J Prosthet Dent . 2019 Jun;121(6):887-894
  3. Baba NZ. Contemporary restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Chicago: Quintessence Int; 2013.
  4. Chugal N, Mallya SM., Kahler B, Lin LM. Endodontic Treatment Outcomes. Dental Clinics of North America. 2017;61(1):59–80.
  5. Tronstad L, Asbjørnsen K, Døving L, Pedersen I, Eriksen HM. Influence of coronal restorations on the periapical health of endodontically treated teeth. Dental Traumatology. 2000;16(5):218–21.
  6. Craveiro MA, Fontana CE, de Martin AS, da Silveira BCE. Influence of coronal restoration and root canal filling quality on periapical status: clinical and radiographic evaluation. Journal of Endodontics. 2015;41(6):836–40.
  7. Basrani B. Endodontic radiology. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
  8. Ng Y, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K. Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature – Part 2. Influence of clinical factors. International Endodontic Journal. 2007;0(0):071011095702005.
  9. Mohan SM, Gowda EM, Shashidhar MP. Clinical evaluation of the fiber post and direct composite resin restoration for fixed single crowns on endodontically treated teeth. Medical Journal Armed Forces India. 2015;71(3):259–64.
  10. Jung S, Min K, Chang H, et. al. Microleakage and fracture patterns of teeth restored with different posts under dynamic loading. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2007;98(4):270–6.
  11. Yee K, Bhagavatula P, Stover S, et al. Survival Rates of Teeth with Primary Endodontic Treatment after Core/Post and Crown Placement. Journal of Endodontics. 2018;44(2):220–5.
  12. Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. Journal of Endodontics. 2004;30(5):289–301.
  13. Doyle SL, Hodges JS, Pesun IJ, et. al. Factors affecting outcomes for single-tooth implants and endodontic restorations. Journal of Endodontics. 2007;33(4):399–402.
  14. Marquis VL, Dao T, Farzaneh M, Abitbol S, Friedman S. Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto Study. Phase III: initial treatment. Journal of Endodontics. 2006;32(4):299–306.
  15. Suksaphar W, Banomyong D, Jirathanyanatt T, Ngoenwiwatkul Y. Survival Rates from Fracture of Endodontically Treated Premolars Restored with Full-coverage Crowns or Direct Resin Composite Restorations: A Retrospective Study. Journal of Endodontics. 2018;44(2):233–8.
  16. Zarevski P, KovaÄ M, MateÅ¡ić K. Gender differences in general knowledge: Do residential status and the type of school matter? Review of Psychology. 2014;21(2):131–5.
  17. Sun. Relationship Between the Severity of Malocclusion and Oral Health Related Quality of Life: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry. 2017;15(6):503–17.
  18. Song M, Park M, Lee C, Kim E. Periapical status related to the quality of coronal restorations and root fillings in a Korean population. J Endod. 2014;40(2):182–6.
  19. Connert T, Truckenmüller M, El-Ayouti A, et. al. Changes in periapical status, quality of root fillings and estimated endodontic treatment need in a similar urban German population 20 years later. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2019;23(3):1373–82.
  20. Shakiba B, Hamedy R, Pak JG, Barbizam JV, et. al. Influence of increased patient age on longitudinal outcomes of root canal treatment: a systematic review. Gerodontology. 2017;34(1):101–9. doi: 10.1111/ger.12231.
  21. Walton RE, Torabinejad M. Endodontics: principles and practice. Fifth edition. Missouri: Elsevier, 2015

Lisensi Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
Contact us: Odonto Dental Journal: Jl. Raya Kaligawe Km.4, PO BOX 1054/SM Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112. Email: odontodentaljournal@unissula.ac.id
apps