collections_bookmark Focus and Scope
MEDALI Journal is published with the aim of sharing information about publications (research results, case reports and review articles) that have been carried out in the field of dentistry.
covered:
- Oral Biology,
- Pediatric Dentistry,
- Oral Maxillofacial surgery,
- Periodontic,
- Prosthodontic,
- Orthodontic,
- Operative dentistry,
- Endodontic,
- Biomoleculer Dentistry,
- Dental Public Health,
- Oral Radiology,
- Oral Medicine,
- Dental Forensic,
- Oral Pathology,
- Dental Material
create_new_folder Section Policies
Articles
device_hub Peer Review Process
All manuscripts submitted to this journal must follow focus and scope, and author guidelines of this journal. The submitted manuscripts must address scientific merit or novelty appropriate to the focus and scope. All manuscripts must be free from plagiarism contents. All authors are suggested to use plagiarism detection softaware to do the similarity checking. Editors check the plagiarism detection of articles in this journal by using a Turnitin software.
The research article submitted to this journal will be peer-reviewed at least 2 (two) or more expert reviewers. The reviewers give scientific valuable comments improving the contents of the manuscript.
Final decision of articles acceptance will be made by Editors according to reviewers comments. Publication of accepted articles including the sequence of published articles will be made by Editor in Chief by considering sequence of accepted date and geographical distribution of authors as well as thematic issue.
Submitted papers are evaluated by anonymous referees for contribution, originality, relevance, and presentation. The Editor shall inform you of the results of the review as soon as possible, hopefully in 4 or 6 weeks.
event_note Publication Frequency
Medali Jurnal:Media Dental Intelektual is an open access, scientific and peer-reviewed journal published by Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung twice a year in February and August
copyright Open Access Policy
Gen AI Policy
1. Purpose of the Policy
This policy is established to ensure that the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in manuscript preparation remains ethical, transparent, and aligned with academic integrity. GenAI may assist authors, but it must not replace the critical role of researchers in producing scientific work.
2. General Principles
GenAI is allowed with limitations for:
Language editing (grammar checking, light paraphrasing)
Idea exploration or brainstorming
Clarifying general concepts
Creating non-plagiarized illustrations or figures
GenAI is strictly prohibited for:
Writing the entire article or major portions of the manuscript
Generating research data, tables, statistics, or fabricated findings
Producing false citations, references, or scholarly sources
Automatically generating scientific analysis without author verification
3. Author Responsibilities
Authors are fully responsible for:
The accuracy of data and research results
The originality of the manuscript
The validity of references
The soundness of scientific arguments
Any content generated using GenAI must be reviewed, verified, and rewritten by the authors in their own understanding.
4. AI Use Disclosure Requirement
If GenAI is used in any capacity, the authors must provide a disclosure statement in the Acknowledgment or Methods section.
Example Disclosure Statement:
“The authors used Generative AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT) in a limited manner for language editing and clarification. All content, analysis, and interpretations are the authors’ own and have been independently verified.”
If no GenAI tools were used, a disclosure is not required.
5. Restrictions on AI-Generated Citations and References
Authors are prohibited from:
Using GenAI-generated references without verification
Citing non-existent or hallucinated sources
Including invalid DOIs or fabricated articles
All cited literature must be validated using legitimate academic databases such as:
Google Scholar
Scopus
CrossRef
DOAJ
Official institutional repositories
6. Policy for Reviewers and Editors
Reviewers must not use GenAI to automatically evaluate or summarize manuscripts.
Reviewers may use GenAI to refine the language of their review reports, but not to judge scientific quality.
Editors may use AI-detection tools as part of the originality screening process.
7. Consequences of Policy Violations
Violations of the GenAI policy may result in:
Immediate rejection during pre-review screening
Retraction of the article after publication
Temporary or permanent submission ban to Jurnal INOVISH
8. Policy Revision
This policy may be updated in line with technological developments and international research ethics standards (COPE, IEEE, Elsevier, DOAJ Guidelines).

