Implementation of Sustainable Development Management in Strategic Decision Making in Determining the Location of Final Processing Places (TPA) Case Study of North Penajam Paser Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30659/jrbi.v23i2.52824Keywords:
AHP, GIS, Landfill Location, North Penajam Paser, Strategic Decision Making, Sustainable Development Management.Abstract
This study aims to identify the criteria for sustainable Final Processing Site (TPA) locations based on the Sustainable Development Management framework, determine the relative weights of the criteria using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, and integrate it with Geographic Information System (GIS)-based spatial analysis to produce a landfill location suitability map in North Penajam Paser Regency. In addition, this study also aims to formulate priority zones for landfill locations along with their managerial implications for local governments. To achieve these objectives, the study employed a mixed approach utilizing secondary data in the form of spatial data, statistical data, and spatial planning documents. The study was conducted by deriving criteria from the sustainability dimension and synthesizing previous studies, followed by weighting the criteria using AHP through a secondary/adaptive weighting approach. Furthermore, each criterion was processed in GIS and combined using a weighted overlay technique to produce a site suitability map. The analysis also continued with a suitability test against the RTRW/RDTR and area zoning, which were very suitable for determining priority landfill locations. The results of the study indicate that the weighted overlay analysis produces three suitability classes, namely highly suitable covering an area of 51,341 ha (21.55%), suitable covering an area of 149,066 ha (62.61%), and unsuitable covering an area of 37,701 ha (15.84%). Of the highly suitable area, only 10,893 ha (21.3%) is in line with the RTRW/RDTR. This study also produces three priority zones, namely ZP-01 in Penajam District covering an area of 485 ha, ZP-02 in Waru District covering an area of 1,342 ha, and ZP-03 in Penajam District covering an area of 219 ha. ZP-01 is recommended as the main priority. This study shows that the application of Sustainable Development Management combined with GIS-AHP can provide a more measurable, transparent, and accountable analytical basis in strategic decision-making for determining the location of the landfill.
References
Journals:
Abebe, B. Y., Abera, D. R., & Wondimu, G. T. (2023). Landfill site suitability analysis using GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation in Ethiopia. Environmental Systems Research, 12(1), 1–12.
Ahire, V., Behera, D. K., Saxena, M. R., Patil, S., Endait, M., & Poduri, H. (2022). Potential landfill site suitability study for environmental sustainability using GIS-based multi-criteria techniques for Nashik and environs. Environmental Earth Sciences, 81, 178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10295-y
Al-Karadsheh, L., Al-Momani, M., & Al-Qudah, K. (2023). GIS–AHP based landfill site selection for sustainable waste management. Journal of Environmental Management, 345, 118567.
Artiach, T., Lee, D., Nelson, D., & Walker, J. (2010). The determinants of corporate sustainability performance. Accounting & Finance, 50(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2009.00315.x
Badan Meteorologi, Klimatologi, dan Geofisika. (2023). Data iklim dan curah hujan tahunan Kalimantan Timur. BMKG.
Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Penajam Paser Utara. (2024). Kabupaten Penajam Paser Utara dalam angka 2024. BPS Kabupaten Penajam Paser Utara.
Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Penajam Paser Utara. (2025). Kabupaten Penajam Paser Utara dalam angka 2025. BPS Kabupaten PPU.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2021). Hasil sensus penduduk 2020. Badan Pusat Statistik.
Bappenas. (2020). Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional (RPJMN) 2020–2024.
Bappenas. (2023). Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Panjang Nasional (RPJPN) 2025–2045: Indonesia Emas.
Chen, Y., Yu, J., & Khan, S. (2011). Spatial sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria weights in GIS-based land suitability evaluation. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(12), 1582–1591.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.
Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Kabupaten Penajam Paser Utara. (2023). Dokumen pengelolaan sampah Kabupaten Penajam Paser Utara. DLH Kabupaten PPU.
Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130–141.
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone.
Elkington, J., & Rowlands, I. H. (1999). Cannibals with forks: The evolution of the triple bottom line. Capstone.
Eskandari, M., Homaee, M., & Mahmoodi, S. (2015). Landfill site selection using GIS and fuzzy AHP: A case study of Iran. Environmental Earth Sciences, 73(1), 1–14.
Ghaed Rahmat, Z., Niri, M. V., Alavi, N., Goudarzi, G., Babaei, A. A., Baboli, Z., & Hosseinzadeh, M. (2017). Landfill site selection using GIS and AHP: A case study in Behbahan, Iran. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 21(1), 111–118.
Karabulut, A. İ., Yazici-Karabulut, B., Derin, P., Yesilnacar, M. İ., & Cullu, M. A. (2022). Landfill siting for municipal solid waste using remote sensing and geographic information system integrated analytic hierarchy process and simple additive weighting methods from the point of view of a fast-growing metropolitan area in GAP area of Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(12), 17142–17160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15951-7
Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia. (2024). Sistem Informasi Pengelolaan Sampah Nasional (SIPSN). https://sipsn.menlhk.go.id
Malczewski, J. (2006). GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: A survey of the literature. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20(7), 703–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810600661508
Mallick, J. (2021). Municipal solid waste landfill site selection based on Fuzzy-AHP and geoinformation techniques in Asir Region Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 13(3), 1538. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031538
Mensah, J. (2019). Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1), Article 1653531. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1653531
Moparthi, S. S., Reddy, T. B., & Rao, V. V. (2021). Sustainable landfill site selection using GIS–AHP. Journal of Environmental Geography, 14(3–4), 15–27.
Pemer, F., Sieweke, J., & Werr, A. (2020). The role of sustainability in the professional service sector. Journal of Service Research, 23(1), 1–15.
Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2019). Three pillars of sustainability: In search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science, 14(3), 681–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5
Rahmen, A. U., Ahmad, A., Sadef, Y., & Younas, M. (2020). Spatial evaluation of waste disposal site selection using GIS-based MCDA. Indonesian Journal of Geography, 52(2), 241–252.
Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process—What it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3–5), 161–176.
Shi, L., Han, L., Yang, F., & Gao, L. (2019). The evolution of sustainable development theory: Types, goals, and research prospects. Sustainability, 11(24), 7158. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247158
Tomlin, C. D. (1990). Geographic information systems and cartographic modeling. Prentice Hall.
VOI Indonesia. (2023, January 5). TPA Buluminung di PPU disiapkan menjadi lokasi pembuangan sampah IKN. https://voi.id
Wolsink, M. (2006). Invalid theory impedes our understanding: A critique on the persistence of the language of NIMBY. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31(1), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2006.00191.x
Zabaleta Santisteban, J. A., Salas López, R., Rojas-Briceño, N. B., Gómez Fernández, D., Medina Medina, A. J., Tuesta Trauco, K. M., Rivera Fernandez, A. S., Lévano Crisóstomo, J., Oliva-Cruz, M., & Silva-López, J. O. (2024). Optimizing landfill site selection using Fuzzy-AHP and GIS for sustainable urban planning. Civil Engineering Journal, 10(6), 1698–1719. https://doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-06-01
Books:
Irawan, I., Idayati, F., Praskadinata, H. Y. C., Waluyo, M., & Ramadhani, R. (2024). Pengembangan sumber daya manusia yang berkelanjutan. Eureka Media Aksara.
Kuslan, A. (2017). Iklim tropis Indonesia dan implikasinya terhadap pengelolaan lingkungan. LIPI Press.
Malczewski, J. (1999). GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
Malczewski, J., & Rinner, C. (2015). Multicriteria decision analysis in geographic information science. Springer.
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. III. (1972). The limits to growth. Universe Books.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill.
Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2012). Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process (2nd ed.). Springer.
Senoaji, F. (2023). Pembangunan sumber daya manusia berkelanjutan. Prenada Media.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
