Legal Review of the Prosecutor's Authority in Setting Aside Cases in the Criminal Justice Process

Ramdhani Ramdhani, Gunarto Gunarto

Abstract


Abstract. The waiver of a case is an authority, it is not impossible that the decision to waive a case can be challenged in court, to question whether in carrying out the duties and authority of the case deponeer, the Attorney General has sufficient reasons, namely: To what extent does the waiver of the case meet the requirements for the sake of public interest, namely the interests of the nation and state and/or the interests of the general public and the ideal measure of the use of the opportunity principle and which is able to provide a picture of the prosecution policy in handling criminal cases effectively, efficiently, and responsibly which is carried out without abandoning the sense of justice. The aim of this research is to find out and analyze (1) the nature of the position of the Prosecutor in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System, (2) the legal barometer of the Prosecutor's authority to set aside cases in the criminal justice process, and (3) the fundamental problems of the Prosecutor's authority to set aside criminal cases. The approach method used in this study is normative juridical. The specifications of this study are descriptive analytical. The data source used is secondary data. Secondary data is data obtained from library research consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The research results and discussion can be concluded: (1) In the criminal justice system, the role of the prosecutor's office is very central because the prosecutor's office is the institution that determines whether a person should be examined by the court or not. The prosecutor also determines whether a person will be sentenced or not through the quality of the indictment and charges made. (2) Article 35 letter c of Law Number 11 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia is the legal basis for setting aside cases in the public interest as the authority of the Attorney General. The setting aside of cases in the public interest based on Constitutional Court Decision Number 29/PUU-XIV/2016, can be carried out after the obligation to pay attention to the advice and opinions of state authorities that have a relationship with the problem is carried out by the Attorney General. (3) The issuance of a deponeering decision is a debate in Indonesia both among academics and among state institutions. The debate occurs because of the diversity of opinions or it can be said that for multiple interpretations of the meaning of "public interest" to be applied in a case.

Keywords


Keywords: Case Waiver; Criminal Justice; Prosecutor.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Ani Triwati, Pengesampingan Perkara Demi Kepentingan Umum Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jurnal Ius Constituendum, Volume 6 Nomor 2, April 2021,

Denny Saputra, dkk. Peran Jaksa dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia, Halu Oleo: Law Review, Volume 6 Issue 2, September 2022,

Dian Rosita, Kedudukan Kejaksaan Sebagai Pelaksana Kekuasaan Negara Di Bidang Penuntutan Dalam Struktur Ketatanegaraan Indonesia, Jurnal Ius Constituendum, Vol. 3 No. 1, 2018,

Gita Santika Ramadhani, Peran Kejaksaan Mewujudkan Keadilan Restoratif Sebagai Upaya Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Progresif: Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 15 No. 1, 2021,

I Gusti Agung Ngurap.Satya Widiana, dkk. Wewenang Jaksa Agung dalam Penyampingan Perkara (Deponering) dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana, Jurnal Analogi Hukum, Volume 4 Nomor 1, 2022,

I Kadek Darma Santosa, dkk. Pengaturan Asas Oportunitas dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia, Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, Vol. 9 No. 1, February, 2021,

Imman Yusuf Sitinjak, Peran Kejaksaan dan Peran Jaksa Penuntut Umum dalam Penegakan Hukum, Jurnal Ilmiap.Maksitek, Vol. 3 No. 3, September 2018,

Jojon Desduan Lumban Gaol dan Joko Setiyono, Urgensi Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Jaksa, Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah.Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan, Vol. 17 No. 2, 2023,

Mohamad Nur Wahyudi, Teori Kontrak Sosial (Studi Komparasi Teori Politik Menurut Imam Al-Mawardi, Thomas Hobbes dan John Lock, An-Nawa: Jurnal Studi Islam, Vol 4 No. 2, 2022,

Muhamad Iqbal, Implementasi Efektifitas Asas Oportunitas di Indonesia dengan Landasan Kepentingan Umum, Jurnal Surya Kencana, Vol 9 No1, 2018,

Muhidin, dkk., Implementation of The Ius Curia Novit Principle in Examining Case At The Constitutional Court of The Republic of Indonesia, Baltic Journal of Law & Pollitics, Vol. 15 No. 1, 2022,

Riry Delany dan Diap.Apriani Atika Sari, Investigasi Proprio Motu Terhadap Pelanggaran Hukum Perang Pada Konflik Israel Palestina Dalam Operation Protective Edge, Belli Ac Pacis: Jurnal Hukum Internasional, Vol. 3 No. 1, 2017,

Sufriadi, Tanggung Jawab Jabatan Dan Tanggung Jawab Pribadi Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Di Indonesia, Jurnal Yuridis, Vo. 1 No. 1, 2014,

Tumpal Napitupulu, Penerapan Azas Oportunitas Berhubungan dengan Tugas dan Wewenang Kejaksaan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Kajian Perkara Terhadap Terdakwa Novel bin Salim Baswedan), Tanjungpura Law Journal, Vol 2 No 1, 2018,

Windi Jannati M.A.S & Frans Simangunsong, Makna Kepentingan Umum di Dalam Deponering, Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 2 (2), May – August 2022,

Yelina Rachma P (2010), Tinjauan Tentang Pengaturan Asas Penyampingan Perkara Demi Kepentingan Umum (Asas Oportunitas) Dalam KUHAP dan Relevansinya Dengan Asas Persamaan Kedudukan di Muka Hukum (Equality Before The Law), Surakarta : FP.Universitas Sebelas Maret,

Yeni Handayani, Jaksa Agung dan Pengesampingan Perkara Demi Kepentingan Umum. Jurnal Rechts Vinding, 2016.

Books:

Ahmad Hisamudin (2016), Penerapan Asas Oportunitas dalam Perkara Pidana Bambang Widjojanto Dihubungkan dengan Tujuan Hukum Tentang Kemanfaatan. Thesis Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan

Ahmad M. Ramli (2008), Analisis dan Evaluasi Hukum Penuntutan dan Pemeriksaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jakarta : Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Departemen Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia RI,

Andi Hamzah, dkk (2006). Laporan Hasil Kerja Tim Analisis dan Evaluasi Hukum Tentang Pelaksanaan Asas Opurtunitas Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana,

Darmono (2013), Penyampingan Perkara Pidana Seponering dalam Penegakan Hukum, Jakarta: Solusi Publishing

Eddy O.S. Hiariej (2012), Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian, Jakarta: Erlangga

Hari Sasangka, Lily Rosita, and August Hadiwijoyo (1996). Penyidikan, Penahanan, Penuntutan, dan Praperadilan. Surabaya: Surya Berlian

Mia Banulita (2023), Asas Penuntutan Tunggal, Jakarta: Guepedia

Muh. Ibnu Fajar Rahim (2020), Jaksa Dr. Ibnu: Catatan 3 Tahun Menuntut, Edisi Kejaksaan Negeri Kabupaten Bekasi, Makassar: Humanities Genius

O.C. Kaligis (2011), Deponeering Teori Dan Praktik, Bandung : P.T. Alumni,

Ramelan (2006), Hukum Acara Pidana Teori dan Implementasi, Jakarta: Sumber Ilmu Jaya

RM. Surachman, & Jan. S. Maringka (2015), Eksistensi Kejaksaan Dalam Konstitusi di Berbagai Negara, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika,

Rony Hanitijo Soemitro (1990), Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri, Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia,

Rusadi Kantaprawira (1987), Aplikasi Pendekatan Sistem Dalam Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, Jakarta : Bunda Karya

Rusli Muhammad (2011), Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia, Yogyakarta: UII Press,

Surachman & Andi Hamzah (1995). Jaksa di Berbagai Negara Peranan dan Kedudukannya. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika

T. Effendi (2013), Sistem Peradilan Pidana: Perbandingan Komponen & Proses Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Beberapa Negara, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia,

Tatang M. Arifin (1989), Pokok-Pokok Teori Sistem, Jakarta : Rajawali.

Tolib Effendi (2013), Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Perbandingan Komponen dan Proses Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Berbagai Negara, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia,

Y. Harahap (2005), Pembahasan dan Penerapan KUHAP. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika

Regulation:

Constitutional Court Decision Number 29/PUU-XIV/2016 concerning the Judicial Review of

Constitutional Court Number 40/PUU-XIV/2016 dated 11 January 2017 Concerning the Meaning of “Public Interest” as the Basis for Waiving Cases by the Attorney General

Law Number 5 of 1991 concerning the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia

Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia Against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jhku.v20i2.46191

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Hukum Khairu Ummah Indexed by :

google_scholar
Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah
   
Faculty of LawUnissulaCopyright of Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah
Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk,

ISSN ( 1907-3119 )

e-ISSN ( 2988-3334 )

Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112