INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY
Bridging Law, Technology, and Justice in the Digital Ag
Abstract
Abstract
Digital innovation has emerged as a powerful force reshaping legal systems, governance mechanisms, and the protection of human rights worldwide. Technologies such as artificial intelligence, digital platforms, algorithmic governance, and big data have accelerated legal reform while simultaneously creating new challenges related to inequality, surveillance, and the concentration of unaccountable power. This article explores the nexus between digital innovation, legal reform, and social justice through an interdisciplinary legal approach that combines doctrinal legal analysis with human rights theory, political economy, and ethical perspectives. Employing a qualitative normative methodology based on secondary legal and scholarly sources, the study examines contemporary legal responses to digital transformation and assesses their effectiveness in safeguarding human dignity, equality, and accountability. The analysis reveals that although digital technologies enhance access to information and justice for certain groups, they also exacerbate structural exclusion, algorithmic bias, labor precarity, and transnational regulatory fragmentation. The findings further indicate that legal regulation alone is insufficient to govern digital power in the absence of ethical foundations, integrated social policy, and coordinated global legal frameworks. The study concludes that without a justice-oriented regulatory paradigm, digital legal reform risks reinforcing technocratic domination rather than achieving inclusive and equitable modernization. Accordingly, the article advocates for a human rights–centered, interdisciplinary model of digital governance that places social justice, accountability, and human dignity at the heart of future legal reform.
Keywords: Digital innovation, Legal reform, Human rights, Social justice, Digital governance
References
References
Abdul Mustafa, Muhammad Ishaque, Rehan Raza, Samiullah, & Muhammad Irfan Raza. (2025). When culture meets fiqh: Examining the legal authority of ʿurf in contemporary engagement traditions. Global Islamic Research Journal, 1(1), 1–21.
https://girj.net/girj/article/view/6
Auda, J. (2019). Maqasid al-Shariah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach (2nd ed.). London: International Institute of Islamic Thought.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3239436
Azhari, A. M., Azhari, S., Yaqooq, M. I., (2025). Global transformations in law, justice, and society: Comparative perspectives on governance, rights, and legal reform. International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (IJLSS), 1(1), 60–90. https://ijlss.net/ijlss/article/view/7
Bradford, A. (2020). The Brussels effect. Northwestern University Law Review, 114(1), 1–67.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2770634
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). Data colonialism: Rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television & New Media, 20(4), 336–349.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796632
De Gregorio, G. (2024). The rise of digital constitutionalism in the era of artificial intelligence. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 22(1), 1–25.
https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moae004
Guenduez, A. A., & others. (2025). Digital ethics: Global trends and divergent paths. Journal of Digital
Governance & Ethics. — This paper analyses the growing variety of “digital ethics” policies worldwide and argues for multidisciplinary legal–ethical governance rather than purely technical or market-driven reforms.
Lendvai, G. F., & Gosztonyi, G. (2025). Algorithmic Bias as a Core Legal Dilemma in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Conceptual Basis and the Current State of Regulation. Laws, 14(3), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14030041
Lessig, L. (2006). Code: Version 2.0. New York, NY: Basic Books.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780465039142.001.0001
Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1–21.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679
Multazam, M. T., & Widiarto. (2023). Digitalization of the legal system: Opportunities and challenges. Rechtsidee.
Onțanu, E. A. (2025). Digital technology and procedural justice: Towards a more accessible and efficient justice system. Tilburg Law Review. https://doi.org/10.5334/tilr.422
Ranchordás, S., & Evas, T. (2024). Designing human rights impact assessments for artificial intelligence. Computer Law & Security Review, 52, 105836.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105836
Rico, P. (2024). AI and Data Governance: A Legal Framework for Algorithmic Accountability and Human Rights. — This study examines how AI and big data reshape governance and stresses the need for legal frameworks to protect human rights amid technological transformation.
United Nations Development Programme. (2023). The impact of digital technology on human rights in Europe and Central Asia: Trends and challenges related to data protection, artificial intelligence and other digital technology issues. Istanbul: UNDP Regional Hub.
Veale, M., & Borgesius, F. Z. (2023). Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act. Computer Law & Security Review, 47, 105756.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105756
Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Floridi, L. (2017). Why a right to explanation of automated decision-making does not exist in the General Data Protection Regulation. International Data Privacy Law, 7(2), 76–99.
https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipx005
Yeung, K. (2018). Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation. Regulation & Governance, 12(4), 505–523.
https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12158
Zuboff, S. (2019). Surveillance capitalism and the challenge of collective action. New Labor Forum, 28(1), 10–29.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1095796018819461
Article Statistic
Abstract view : 119 timesPDF views : 86 times
How To Cite This :
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
