Lexical acquisition in blended EFL learning: Integrating the enriched virtual model into VARK learning styles

Theresia Cicik Sophia Budiman, Sri Wuli Fitriati, Widhiyanto Widhiyanto

Abstract


Vocabulary knowledge plays a fundamental role in second language (L2) proficiency and is strongly linked to students’ academic success in higher education. As blended learning becomes increasingly prevalent in university contexts, there is a growing need for instructional models that promote flexibility, learner engagement, and multimodal input. This study investigates the integration of VARK learning styles—Visual, Aural, Read/Write, and Kinesthetic—within the Enriched Virtual Model (EVM) to support lexical competence among English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. Adopting a mixed-methods design, the study involved 53 undergraduate students enrolled in a Lexical Studies course. Quantitative data were collected through pre- and post-tests to measure lexical gains, while qualitative insights were obtained from reflective journals and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed using paired-sample t-tests to examine pretest–posttest differences, one-way ANOVA to compare vocabulary gains across VARK learning-style groups, and Cohen’s d to determine effect size. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically following Braun and Clarke’s six-step framework.

The findings reveal a statistically significant improvement in students’ lexical mastery, with a large effect size indicating a strong instructional impact. Analysis across VARK categories shows that Visual and Read/Write learners benefited most from the multimodal online materials, although positive progress was observed across all learning-style groups. Qualitative results further indicate that the VARK-informed EVM enhanced learner engagement, autonomy, and motivation by allowing students to interact with vocabulary through varied and flexible modalities. However, challenges related to cognitive workload and limited opportunities for kinesthetic engagement in online environments were also reported. These findings suggest the importance of balancing modality representation when designing blended vocabulary instruction. Overall, this study contributes to multimodal lexical pedagogy and offers practical implications for developing adaptive and learner-centered blended learning models in higher education.


Keywords


Enriched Virtual Model (EVM); learning style; lexical acquisition, VARK

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adnan, M. (2020). Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students’ perspectives. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 2(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.2020261309

Aliasin, S. H., Dehghanzadeh, H., & Hashemi, M. (2019). Effects of multimodal instruction on EFL learners’ vocabulary learning. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.1246a

Albiladi, W. S., & Alshareef, A. F. (2019). Blended learning in English teaching and learning: A review of the current literature. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(2), 232–238. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1002.03

Al-Said, K. (2020). Students’ perceptions of online vocabulary learning. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 2497–2515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10025-x

Astuti, P., & Lammers, J. C. (2017). Learners' agency in technology-enhanced EFL classrooms in Indonesia. TEFLIN Journal, 28(2), 1–18.

Barrot, J. S. (2021). Effects of online learning on EFL learners’ vocabulary development: A metacognitive perspective. Language Teaching Research, 25(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211034540

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cartwright, T. J., & Hallar, B. (2018). Taking risks with a growth mindset: Long-term influence of an elementary pre-service after school science practicum. International Journal of Science Education, 40(3), 348–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1420261

Chen, C. M., & Li, Y. L. (2020). Personalized vocabulary learning using a mobile-based system. Educational Technology & Society, 23(1), 16–29.

Chen, H. (2021). Multimodal learning and vocabulary uptake in virtual classrooms. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(6), 667–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1704786

Clinton-Lisell, V., Moughamian, A., & King, S. (2024). Rethinking learning styles in multimedia learning environments: Implications for design and engagement. Computers & Education, 205, Article 104889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104889

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Derakhshan, A., Coombe, C., Arabmofrad, A., & Taghizadeh, M. (2020). Online and blended vocabulary learning: A systematic review. Applied Linguistics Review, 11(4), 1–28.

Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2018). The impact of virtual worlds on EFL learners’ oral proficiency. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(7), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1429711

Fitriani, N., & Wibowo, A. S. (2021). VARK-based learning in EFL classrooms: Enhancing student engagement through multimodal instruction. TESOL International Journal, 16(6), 45–60.

Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Academy, 11(1), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-4822.1992.tb00213.x

Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. Jossey-Bass.

Ghobadi, S., & Taki, S. (2018). The effect of learner-generated visuals on vocabulary retention. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(3), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1396838

Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 333–350). Routledge.

Handayani, D. (2020). Blended learning in Indonesian EFL classrooms. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 54–64.

Hapsari, S., & Setyarini, S. (2021). Students’ engagement in multimodal EFL learning. TEFLIN Journal, 32(2), 390–407.

Katasila, A. (2022). Multimodal input and vocabulary learning in blended EFL environments. Journal of Asia TEFL, 19(3), 743–759. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2022.19.3.11.743

Kurniawati, I. D., & Nita, S. (2018). Multimedia-based learning for vocabulary understanding. DoubleClick Journal, 1(2), 68–75.

Ko, M., & Kim, J. (2020). Effects of blended learning on vocabulary retention in EFL contexts. ReCALL, 32(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344019000153

Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54(3), 399–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2004.00260.x

Li, S. (2022). Technology-enhanced vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Language Learning & Technology, 26(2), 1–25.

Marzulina, L., & Desvitasari, D. (2020). Students’ vocabulary improvement through blended learning in EFL classrooms. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(3), 754–764.

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Rahimi, A., & Arif, M. (2019). Mobile-assisted vocabulary learning among EFL learners. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 4(1), 1–15.

Rassaei, E. (2017). Effects of mobile-mediated practice on L2 vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 21(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817731910

Schmitt, N. (2014). Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning, 64(4), 913–951. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12077

Setiadi, B., & Fadhilah, N. (2022). Multimodal learning resources and vocabulary mastery among Indonesian EFL learners. Proceedings of the International Conference on Education and Technology.

Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2015). Blended learning: The evolution of online and face-to-face education. Clayton Christensen Institute.

Suhadi, D., & Utami, L. (2022). The effect of online multimodal instruction on vocabulary achievement. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 22(1), 77–89.

Sysoyev, P., & Evstigneeva, I. (2020). Digital multimodal texts for L2 vocabulary development. The Modern Language Journal, 104(3), 518–534.

Teng, F. (2019). The efficacy of extended vocabulary activities in blended learning contexts. Language Teaching Research, 23(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818765319

Tosun, S. (2015). The effects of blended learning on EFL students’ vocabulary enhancement. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 641–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.592

Webb, S., & Nation, P. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 55(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2017-0001

Yuliana, N., & Sulastri, E. (2022). Learning styles and English vocabulary mastery. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, 11(2), 145–156.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/e.11.1.237-256

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Theresia Cicik Sophia Budiman, Sri Wuli Fitriati, Widhiyanto Widhiyanto

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/