The Urgency of Notary Involvement in the Process of Destroying Illegal Fishing Evidence to Achieve Legal Certainty and Justice
Abstract
Illegal fishing is a serious crime that results in state losses, damage to marine ecosystems, and social injustice for local fishermen. One form of law enforcement carried out by the state is the destruction of evidence in the form of fishing vessels and gear. However, in practice, the process of destroying such evidence still leaves legal issues, particularly regarding legal certainty, accountability, and protection of the rights of related parties. This study aims to analyze the urgency of notary involvement in the process of destroying illegal fishing evidence as an effort to realize legal certainty and justice. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results show that notary involvement through the creation of authentic deeds can provide legal certainty, transparency, and strengthen the legitimacy of the action of destroying evidence so that it is in line with the values of substantive justice. Illegal fishing is a serious crime that not only causes economic losses to the state but also damages marine ecosystems and causes social injustice for local fishermen who engage in legal fishing activities. As a form of law enforcement, the state imposes additional criminal sanctions in the form of destroying evidence, particularly vessels and fishing gear used in the crime. However, in practice, the destruction of evidence of illegal fishing still faces various legal challenges, particularly those related to legal certainty, transparency, accountability, and the protection of the rights of the parties involved. This situation has the potential to give rise to legal disputes and undermine the legitimacy of the destruction of evidence. This study aims to analyze the urgency of notary involvement in the process of destroying evidence of illegal fishing as an effort to realize legal certainty and substantive legal justice. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach, through a review of laws and regulations in the field of fisheries and notaries as well as relevant legal doctrines. The results of the study indicate that notary involvement through the creation of authentic deeds can provide legal certainty, increase transparency and accountability, and provide legal protection for all interested parties. Thus, notary involvement can strengthen the legitimacy of the policy of destroying evidence of illegal fishing as part of just law enforcement and based on the principles of the rule of law.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journals:
Abdullah, M. (2020). Penegakan hukum berbasis nilai keadilan. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15(1).
Dewi, K. (2022). Peran pejabat umum dalam penegakan hukum pidana. Jurnal Kenotariatan Indonesia, 14(1).
Gunawan, Y. (2023). Pemusnahan barang bukti dan perlindungan hukum. Jurnal Ius Civile, 7(1).
Hasan, R. (2019). Sanksi pidana tambahan dalam hukum perikanan. Jurnal Rechtsidee, 6(2).
Hidayat, M. (2020). Transparansi dan akuntabilitas penegakan hukum. Jurnal Supremasi Hukum, 9(1).
Kurniawan, A. (2020). Akta autentik sebagai alat bukti dalam penegakan hukum. Jurnal Yuridika, 35(2).
Lestari, R. (2021). Kepastian hukum dalam pemusnahan barang bukti. Jurnal Hukum Negara, 5(2).
Nugroho, B. (2019). Peran notaris dalam menjamin kepastian hukum. Jurnal Kenotariatan, 11(1).
Prasetyo, T. (2016). Keadilan substantif dalam penegakan hukum. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 4(2).
Pratama, Y. (2019). Penyalahgunaan wewenang dalam penegakan hukum pidana. Jurnal Hukum Pidana, 8(1).
Putra, I. M. (2019). Penegakan hukum perikanan berbasis nilai keadilan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 16(3).
Rahman, F. (2021). Legal control dalam sistem peradilan pidana. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 6(2).
Santoso, H. (2017). Akuntabilitas penegakan hukum pidana. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 6(1).
Sari, D. P. (2018). Pemusnahan kapal illegal fishing dan kepastian hukum. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 48(3).
Siregar, A. (2020). Perlindungan hak pihak ketiga dalam pemusnahan barang bukti. Jurnal Hukum dan HAM, 11(2).
Suryani, E. (2021). Akta notaris dan kepastian hukum perbuatan hukum. Jurnal RechtIdee, 16(2).
Utami, N. (2022). Reformasi hukum perikanan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Kelautan, 4(1).
Wibowo, T. (2018). Kebijakan hukum pidana perikanan di Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Hukum, 7(1).
Widodo, S. (2017). Penegakan hukum tindak pidana illegal fishing di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 24(2).
Wulandari, S. (2022). Pemusnahan barang bukti dalam perspektif negara hukum. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 11(3).
Books:
Adjie, Habib. (2011). Hukum Notaris Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Adjie, Habib. (2015). Kebatalan dan Pembatalan Akta Notaris. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Ali, Achmad. (2009). Menguak Teori Hukum dan Teori Peradilan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2010). Hukum Tata Negara dan Pilar-Pilar Demokrasi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. (2010). Hukum Tata Negara dan Pilar-Pilar Demokrasi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. (2012). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Atmasasmita, Romli. (2010). Teori dan Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Atmasasmita, Romli. (2018). Rekonstruksi Asas Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Barda Nawawi Arief. (2008). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana.
Barda Nawawi Arief. (2010). Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana.
Barda Nawawi Arief. (2014). Perbandingan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Bruggink, J.J.H. (1999). Refleksi tentang Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Busroh, Abu Daud. (2012). Ilmu Negara. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Damang, S.H. (2011). Teori Keadilan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia.
Friedman, Lawrence M. (2001). American Law. New York: Norton & Company.
Fuady, Munir. (2013). Teori Negara Hukum Modern. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Habib Adjie. (2015). Hukum Notaris Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Hadjon, Philipus M. (2011). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.
Hamzah, Andi. (2014). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Harahap, Yahya. (2010). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hart, H.L.A. (1994). The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Huda, Ni’matul. (2015). Negara Hukum, Demokrasi dan Judicial Review. Yogyakarta: UII Press.
Kelsen, Hans. (2007). Teori Umum tentang Hukum dan Negara. Bandung: Nusa Media.
Khairandy, Ridwan. (2013). Hukum Kontrak Indonesia. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press.
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. (2017). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. (2019). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. (2009). Penemuan Hukum. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. (2010). Mengenal Hukum. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Muladi & Barda Nawawi Arief. (2010). Teori dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.
Muladi. (2002). Hak Asasi Manusia. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. (2009). Hukum dan Perilaku. Jakarta: Kompas.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. (2010). Penegakan Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Kompas.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. (2014). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Rawls, John. (2006). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Salim HS. (2015). Teknik Pembuatan Akta Notaris. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Soekanto, Soerjono & Mamudji, Sri. (2011). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Soekanto, Soerjono. (2010). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Subekti. (2014). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Intermasa.
Sudarto. (2009). Hukum dan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.
Sunggono, Bambang. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Widodo, S. (2017). “Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Illegal Fishing di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 24(2).
Yuliandri. (2011). Asas-Asas Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Zainal Asikin. (2012). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Regulation:
Criminal Procedure Code (Law No. 8 of 1981).
Law No. 31 of 2004 concerning Fisheries.
Law No. 45 of 2009 concerning Amendments to the Fisheries Law.
Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Office of Notaries.
Law No. 31 of 2004 concerning Fisheries.
Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Office of Notaries.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta.v12i4.50376
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 JURNAL AKTA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Akta has been indexed by:
Editorial Office: Jurnal Akta Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455
Email: jurnalakta@unissula.ac.id