Integration of Economic Analysis of Law and Restorative Justice in Criminal Law Reform: An Interdisciplinary Approach for Efficiency and Humanization of the Justice System
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the challenges of the Indonesian criminal justice system, particularly its lack of effectiveness, efficiency, and substantive justice caused by overcriminalization and prison overcapacity. The purpose is to develop a more efficient and humane sentencing policy by integrating Economic Analysis of Law (EAL) and Restorative Justice (RJ) into a comprehensive policy framework. The research method used is normative juridical with multidisciplinary approaches, combining conceptual, historical, and comparative analysis. The study critically evaluates weaknesses in the conventional sentencing system, examines the substantive provisions of the 2023 Criminal Code (KUHP), and applies cost-benefit analysis within the framework of restorative justice values. The analysis also considers comparative perspectives from other jurisdictions and incorporates insights from law, economics, criminology, and social sciences to ensure a more holistic understanding. The novelty in this research is the formulation of an integrative EAL-RJ model that not only addresses efficiency through economic considerations but also promotes social restoration, participation, and justice for victims and offenders. Unlike existing approaches that separate deterrence from restoration, this model seeks to combine both objectives in a balanced way. It is designed to be flexible and applicable across different types of crimes, including serious offenses, with decision-making based on evidence, proportionality, and societal participation. Based on the research, it can be concluded that the integration of EAL and RJ offers a promising alternative to conventional punitive sentencing. This integrative model can reduce overcapacity in correctional institutions, enhance cost efficiency, and promote reconciliation and social harmony. The study thus contributes to the development of a more contextual, fair, and restorative-oriented Indonesian criminal justice system that is sustainable in the long term.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akbar, M. F. (2022). Pembaharuan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 51(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.51.2.2022.199-208
Arifin, Y. (2021). Dekriminalisasi dan Keadilan Restoratif. Jurnal Hukum IUS, 9(3), 442–460.
Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 472–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(56)80126-8
Bentham, J. (1789). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Clarendon Press.
Cooter, R., & Ulen, T. (2012). Law and Economics, 6th ed. Pearson/Addison Wesley.
Darmika, I. M. R., Dewi, S. L., & Widyantara, I. M. M. (2022). Tindakan Kriminalisasi Terhadap Seseorang Dengan Menggunakan Instrumen Undang-Undang ITE. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 3(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.3.2.4835.344-350
Direktorat Jenderal Pemasyarakatan. (2023). Data Overkapasitas Lapas per April 2023.
Forsyth, M., & Braithwaite, V. (2020). From reintegrative shaming to restorative institutional hybridity. The International Journal of Restorative Justice, 3(1), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.5553/tijrj/258908912020003001002
Hamzah, A. (2008). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. Rineka Cipta.
Hoyle, C. (2003). Restorative Justice, Victims and the Police. SAGE Publication.
Humas. (2022). Tantangan KUHP Nasional: Ubah Paradigma Hukum Pidana. Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional.
Indonesia, R. (2023). Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Jurnal, I., & Education, I. (2025). Reforming Indonesian Criminal Law: Integrating Supervision, Punishment, And Rehabilitation For Restorative Justice. International Jurnal Islamic Education , and Multiclturalism, 7(1), 256–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47006/ijierm.v7i1.434
Lesmana, C. S. A. T., Program, L. S., Putra, N., Raya, J., Kaler, C., Sukabumi, K., & Barat, J. (2022). Page Reorientation of Indonesian Criminal Policy Based on the Economic Analysis Of Law Approach. De Lega Lata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(3), 349–359.
Li, D. (2017). Institutional Incentives, Game Equilibrium and Social Justice: Toward a Unified Theory of Pure Jurisprudence. Social Sciences in China, 38(4), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2017.1376959
Marshall, T. F. (1999). Restorative Justice: An Overview, Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate.
Mokoena, J.-P., & Nshimiyimana, E. (2025). Traditional Conflict Resolution in Modern Peacebuilding: Gacaca Courts in Post-Genocide Rwanda. Culture. Society. Economy. Politics, 5(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.2478/csep-2025-0003
Ness, D. W. Van, & Strong, K. H. (2015). Restoring Justice: An Introduction to Restorative Justice, 5th ed. LexisNexis.
Norwegian Ministry of Justice. (2016). Punishment that Works – Crime that Pays. Government Publication.
Posne, R. A. (2014). Economic Analysis of Law, 9th ed. Wolters Kluwer.
Posner, R. A. (2014). Economic Analysis of Law, 9th ed. Wolters Kluwer.
Posner, W. M. L., & Richard. (1987). The Economic Structure of Tort Law. Harvard University Press.
Robinson, P. H., & Darley, J. M. (2004). Does Criminal Law Deter? A Behavioural Science Investigation. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 24(2), 173–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/24.2.173
Saini, N., & -, D. S. R. (2025). Potential Reforms for a More Effective and Humane Criminal Justice System: Reimagining Justice for the 21st Century. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 7(2), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i02.42473
Shavell, S. (2004). Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law. Harvard University Press.
Tonry, M. (2017). Making Peace with Criminal Law. Criminal Justice Ethics, 36(2), 108–125.
Trauthig, I. K. (2018). The status of Germany’s rehabilitation and deradicalisation programmes. In International Case Studies of Terrorist Rehabilitation (pp. 9–10). Routledge.
Umbreit, M. S., Vos, B., Coates, R. B., & Lightfoot, E. (2005). Restorative Justice in the Twenty-First Century: A Social Movement Full of Opportunities and Pitfalls. Marquette Law Review, 89(2), 251–304.
University, U. (2020). Restorative Justice in the Netherlands, Policy Brief. Utrecht press.
Utami, R. S. (2023). Restorative Justice: A Comprehensive Shift Towards Victim-Perpetrator Reconciliation and Community Healing. Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 18(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v18i3.959
van Velthoven, B., & van Wijck, P. (2016). Becker’s theory on crime and punishment, a useful guide for law enforcement policy in The Netherlands? Recht Der Werkelijkheid, 37(1), 6–31. https://doi.org/10.5553/rdw/138064242016037001002
Wolthuis, A., Claessen, J., Slump, G. J., & van Hoek, A. (2019). Dutch developments: restorative justice in legislation and in practice. The International Journal of Restorative Justice, 2(1), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.5553/ijrj/258908912019002001007
Zealand, M. of J. N. (2020). Restorative Justice: Best Practice in New Zealand. MoJ.
Zehr, H. (2002). The Little Book of Restorative Justice. Good Books.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta.v12i3.45125
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 JURNAL AKTA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Akta has been indexed by:
Editorial Office: Jurnal Akta Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455
Email: jurnalakta@unissula.ac.id