Deontological Study of the Binding Strength of Precontractual Promises: A Legal and Ethical Approach
Abstract
This study analyzes the binding force of pre-contractual promises from the perspective of deontological law and ethics. In contract law, pre-contractual promises often raise debates about their validity and legal consequences. This study uses a normative legal approach with descriptive qualitative analysis, which focuses on the analysis of legal norms governing pre-contractual promises. From a deontological ethics perspective, the fulfillment of a promise is considered a moral obligation that must be honored regardless of the consequences, based on the principles of honesty and integrity. This study highlights that the combination of deontological law and ethics approaches can provide a stronger normative basis for assessing pre-contractual obligations, increase legal certainty, and strengthen the principle of trust in business relationships and contractual negotiations. Deontological studies of the binding force of pre-contractual promises confirm that promises made before a formal contract have interrelated legal and ethical dimensions. From a legal perspective, although not always legally binding, the principle of promissory estoppel in common law and the principle of good faith in civil law can provide protection for parties who suffer losses due to unfulfilled pre-contractual promises. Meanwhile, from a deontological ethical perspective, the obligation to fulfill promises is based on universal moral principles, such as honesty and good faith, which form the basis of trust in business and legal interactions.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journals:
Ardyo, B. (2019). Formulasi Pengaturan Tahapan Pra Kontrak dalam Proses Pembentukan Kontrak di Indonesia. Jurnal Yustika: Media Hukum Dan Keadilan, 22(02), 84–93.
Bitca, I., Shargu, L., & Bevziuc, I. (2015). Refusal to contract in the pre-contractual stage. Socio-Economic Research Bulletin, 4, 10–15.
Bogoviz, A. V. (2020). Perspective directions of state regulation of competition between human and artificial intellectual capital in Industry 4.0. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21(4), 583–600. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-11-2019-0270
Dewanti, R. F., Pujiyono, P., & Muryanto, Y. T. (2021). The application of good Faith principle of precontract in common law and civil law contry. Research, Society and Development, 10(16), e139101623621–e139101623621.
Fattah, G. N. (2024). Tinjauan Etika Deontologi Immanuel Kant terhadap Praktik Dāna dalam Buddhisme: Sebuah Kajian Filosofis atas Teks Dānamahapphala Sutta. Patisambhida: Jurnal Pemikiran Buddha Dan Filsafat, 5(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.53565/patisambhida.v5i1.1189
Halimah, R. (n.d.). ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN KEKUATAN MENGIKAT PRA KONTRAK DALAM HUKUM KONTRAK DI INDONESIA DENGAN HUKUM KONTRAK DI EROPA KONTINENTAL. Jurnal Privat Law, 7(1), 55–59.
Li, X. (2022). Normative Approaches to the Protection of Pre-Contractual Reliance in the Civil Code of the PRC. Law Sci., 1, 783.
Petridean, R. F. S. (2024). The Pre-Contractual Abyss. Law Annals Titu Maiorescu U., 151.
Rahman, A., Juanda, & Latifah, E. D. (2021). Analisis Teori Etika Tentang Sosok Warga Negara Yang Baik. Jurnal Ilmiah Sains, Teknologi, Ekonomi, Sosial Dan Budaya, 5(3), 72–79.
Reynolds, N. (2017). The new neighbour principle: Reasonable expectations, relationality, and good faith in pre-contractual negotiations. Can. Bus. LJ, 60, 94.
Siregar, F. Y. D. (2020). Pandemi As A Reason Force Majeure In Contract Procurement Of Goods/Government Services. NOMOI Law Review, 1(1), 101–110.
Books:
Ali, Z. (2009). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Asikin, Z. (2016). Pengantar metode penelitian hukum.
Caterini, F. (2004). Pre-contractual obligations in France and the United States: a comparative analysis. University of Georgia.
Hogg, M. (2011). Promises and contract law: comparative perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
Qamar, Nuru, Muhammad Syarif, Dachran S. Busthami, dkk. l. (2017). Metode Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research Method). Social Politic Genius.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta.v12i2.44757
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 JURNAL AKTA

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Akta has been indexed by:
Editorial Office: Jurnal Akta Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455
Email: jurnalakta@unissula.ac.id