The Legal Protection of Fiduciary Guarantee Recipients & Resolution of Tort Disputes in the Fiduciary Guarantee Agreement at PT Astrido Pacific Finance

Penulis

  • Indah Pratiwi Widyaningrum University of Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v10i3.34104

Kata Kunci:

Dispute, Fiduciary, Guarantee, Protection, Resolution.

Abstrak

This research aims to examine the legal protection mechanism for recipients of fiduciary guarantees, such as PT Astrido Pacific Finance, in their business practices and to analyze the mechanism for resolving default disputes that can arise in fiduciary guarantee agreements. This research uses normative juridical research methods with a descriptive approach. The data used is secondary data consisting of primary and secondary legal materials. The results of this research show the importance of clarity in laws and regulations related to fiduciary guarantees to provide strong legal protection for recipients of fiduciary guarantees. In addition, a good understanding of the mechanism for resolving default disputes is needed to maintain stability and fairness in fiduciary transactions. It is hoped that the results of this research will provide guidance for PT Astrido Pacific Finance and contribute to the development of legal science in Indonesia.

Referensi

Journals:

Lubis, Aditya Nabilah., Perlawanan Pihak Ketiga Sebagai Pemilik Benda Terhadap Benda Yang Dijadikan Jaminan Fidusia Tanpa Persetujuan Pemilik Benda (Studi Kasus: Putusan Mahkamah Agung 1012 K/PDT/2021). Lex Patrimonium, Vol. 1, No. 1 (2022).

Sembiring, Sentosa. (2007). Arti Penting Jaminan dalam Pemberian Kredit dalam Transaksi Bisnis Perbankan. Gloria Juris, Vol. 7, No. 1 (2007).

Sidabariba, Yogi, Et al., Penyerahan Hak Milik Atas Objek Fidusia Berdasarkan Constitium Possessorium”. Lex Privatum, Vol. IX, No. 8, (2021)

Books:

Asyhadie, Zaeni, dan Kusumawati, Rahma. (2018). Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia. Depok: Rajawali Press.

Efendi, Jonaedi, et. Al,. (2018). Kamus Istilah Hukum Populer. Jakarta: Kencana.

Hadisoeprapto, Hartono. (2004). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perikatan dan Hukum Jaminan. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Prajitno, Andi. (2011). Hukum Fidusia : Problematika Yuridis Pemberlakuan UU No.42 Tahun 1999. Malang: Bayumedia.

Satrio, J. (2007). Hukum Jaminan Hak Jaminan Kebendaan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

_______. (2021). Hukum Jaminan Hak Jaminan Kebendaan Fidusia, (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Sofyan, S. S. Masjchoen. (1980). Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Jaminan dan Jaminan Perorangan, Cet. 1. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

_____________________. (2000). Hukum Perdata: Hukum Benda, Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Supianto, Hukum Jaminan Fidusia, (Yogyakarta: Garudhawaca, 2015), hlm. 47

Widjaja, Gunawan, dan Yani, Ahmad. (2000). Jaminan Fidusia, Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.

Regulations:

Law on Fiduciary Guarantees, Law Number 42 of 1999, LN of 1999 No. 168, TLN No. 3889.

Civil Code [Burgerlijke Wetboek], translated by R. Soebekti and R. Tjitrosidibio.

Court Decision:

Constitutional Court, Decision no. 18/PUU.XVII/2019, Aprilliani Dewi and Suri Agung Prabowo (Petitioners) (2019).

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2023-09-02

Terbitan

Vol 10 No 3 (2023): September 2023

Bagian

Articles

Lisensi

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.
  2. Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
  3. The copyright of this document is owned by Journal Master of Notarial Law (M.Kn) UNISSULA and is protected by law