Notary's Responsibility for Deeds Declared Void or Invalid Based on Court Decision
Abstract
This study aims to analyze: 1) The notary's responsibility for deeds declared null and void based on a court decision. 2) Legal protection for the parties, including notaries, when the deed made is declared null and void. This type of research falls within the scope of normative legal research. The approach method in this research is legislation (statue approach). The type of data in this research is secondary data sourced from primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The data collection method uses library techniques (document study). The analysis in this research is prescriptive. The results of the study concluded: 1) The notary's responsibility for deeds declared null and void based on a court decision is relative and is determined by the notary's level of compliance with legal provisions and the application of the prudential principle. This responsibility can include civil, administrative, and criminal aspects, depending on the presence or absence of elements of error or negligence in carrying out the authority of his position. In Decision Number 43/Pdt.Sus-Gugatan Lain-Lain/2023/PN Niaga Semarang, the cancellation of a deed does not give rise to responsibility for the notary because no formal error was found; Violations occur in the substance of bankruptcy law by the parties, not by the notary. 2) Legal protection for the parties, including notaries, when the deed they have made is declared null and void or invalid aims to ensure legal certainty and justice. Protection for the parties is realized through a court decision that restores violated rights, while for notaries it is provided if they have carried out their official duties in accordance with the Notary Law (UUJN) and the principle of good faith. Legal protection mechanisms include preventive protection through supervision by the Notary Supervisory Board (MPN) and the Notary Honorary Council (MKN), as well as repressive protection through the courts and professional rehabilitation if the notary is not proven guilty. Proportional legal protection ensures a balance between upholding official responsibilities and guaranteeing the independence of the notary profession in carrying out its state function as a guarantor of legal certainty.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journals:
Ary Yuniastuti dan Jawade Hafidz, 2017, “Tinjauan Yuridis Kebatalan Akta dan Pertanggungjawaban Notaris,” Jurnal Akta, Volume 4, Nomor 2.
Catur Budi Dianawati dan Amin Purnawan, 2017, “Kajian Hukum Jaminan Hak Tanggungan yang Dilelang Tanpa Proses Permohonan Lelang Eksekusi ke Ketua Pengadilan Negeri,” Jurnal Akta, Volume 4, Nomor 2.
Dewi Rachmayani dan Agus, 2017, “Covernote Notaris dalam Perjanjian Kredit dalam Perspektif Hukum Jaminan,” Acta Diurnal: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Unpad, Volume 1, Nomor 1.
Dwi Andika, 2017, “Pelaksanaan Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Kode Etik Notaris tentang Pemasangan Papan Nama Notaris di Kota Denpasar,” Jurnal Ilmiah Prodi Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Udayana, Volume 2, Nomor 2.
Henny Tanuwidjaja, 2019, “Pertanggungjawaban Notaris atas Akta yang Dinyatakan Tidak Sah,” Jurnal Hukum Prioris, Volume 8, Nomor 3.
Kunni Afifah, 2017, “Tanggung Jawab dan Perlindungan Hukum bagi Notaris secara Perdata terhadap Akta yang Dibuatnya,” Jurnal Lex Renaissance, Volume 2, Nomor 1.
Rahmad Hendra, 2012, “Tanggung Jawab Notaris terhadap Akta Otentik yang Penghadapnya Mempergunakan Identitas Palsu,” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 3, Nomor 2.
Rita Permanasari dan Akhmad Khisni, 2018, “Imunitas Hukum bagi Notaris yang Membuka Rahasia Jabatan,” Jurnal Akta, Volume 5, Nomor 2.
Rizki Nurmayanti dan Akhmad Khisni, 2017, “Peran dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris dalam Pelaksanaan Pembuatan Akta,” Jurnal Akta, Volume 4, Nomor 4.
Books:
Abdul Ghofur Anshori, 2009, Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia, Perspektif Hukum dan Etika, UII Press, Yogyakarta.
Habib Adjie, 2009, Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif Terhadap Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Publik, Refika Aditama, Bandung.
Habib Adjie, 2011, Hukum Notaris Indonesia: Tafsir Tematik terhadap UUJN, Refika Aditama, Bandung.
Hans Kelsen, 1961, General Theory of Law and State, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Herlien Budiono, 2010, Kumpulan Tulisan Hukum Perdata di Bidang Kenotariatan, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
R. Soeroso, 2011, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
R. Soeroso, 2011, Perbuatan Melawan Hukum di Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
R. Subekti, 2008, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata, Intermasa, Jakarta.
Sjaifurrachman dan Habib Adjie, 2011, Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta, Mandar Maju, Bandung.
Sjaifurrachman, 2011, Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta, Mandar Maju, Bandung.
Sudikno Mertokusumo, 2010, Mengenal Hukum: Suatu Pengantar, Liberty, Yogyakarta.
Regulation:
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia
Civil Code
Criminal Code
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary.
Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations
Law Number 4 of 2023 concerning the Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector
Decision Number 43/ Rev.Sus-Other Lawsuits/ 2023/ PN Niaga Smg.
Notary Code of Ethics
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Editorial Office: TABELLIUS: Journal of Law Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455
Email : tabelius@unissula.ac.id