Legal Implications of Credit Deed Agreements Without Legalization at Banks

Abhinaya Rai Renjana, Muhammad Taufiq, Dahniarti Hasana

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the legal force and legal implications of credit agreements without notarial legalization on legal protection for banks and debtors at the Central Java Regional Development Bank. This study uses an empirical legal method with a statutory and sociological legal approach to examine legal provisions normatively and their application in practice. Data were obtained through interviews and observations as primary data, and literature studies as secondary data. Based on the results of the study, it is concluded that credit agreements without notarial legalization remain valid as long as they meet the requirements for a valid agreement according to the Civil Code, but have limitations in evidentiary power and executorial certainty compared to authentic deeds. From the perspective of legal protection, banks as creditors obtain relative protection and depend on internal control mechanisms, while debtors do not receive the guarantee of independent verification as in notarial legalization. This condition indicates implications for the level of legal certainty for parties in credit practices.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Musyafah, Aisyah Ayu. (2019). “Implikasi Yuridis terhadap Bank Akibat Penurunan Status Perjanjian Kredit dari Akta Otentik Menjadi Akta di Bawah Tangan”. dalam Law, Development & Justice Review, Vol. 2 No. 1 Tahun 2019.

Putri. (2023). “Perlindungan Hukum Debitur dalam Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan”. dalam Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM.

Slamet, Majidi., Bayti, Raudatul., & Haris, Muhammad. (2023). “Analisis tentang Tanggung Jawab dan Kekuatan Legalisasi Akta di Bawah Tangan oleh Notaris”. dalam Falah: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah.

Suwondo. (2020). “Legal Certainty of Credit Agreements Without Notarial Deed”. dalam Jurnal Rechts Vinding.

Wardhani, Restri Ismi., & Wardhana, Rhama Wisnu. (2020). “Tanggung Jawab Notaris terhadap Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta di Bawah Tangan yang Telah Diwaarmerking”. dalam Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan

Books:

Andrianto. (2020). Manajemen Kredit: Teori dan Konsep bagi Bank Umum. Pasuruan: Penerbit Qiara Media.

Bank Jateng. Perjanjian Kredit Bank Jateng Non-Notaris.

Bank Jateng. Perjanjian Kredit Bank Jateng.

Hasrulsah, Bangkit. (2022). Peranan Notaris dalam Penyelesaian Kredit Macet secara Damai atau Sukarela (Studi Kasus pada PT Bank Jateng Capem Pasar Induk Kramat Jati Jakarta Timur). Tesis Magister. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Saktiawan, Muh. Dias. (2020). Akta di Bawah Tangan yang Dilegalisasi dan Diwaarmerking oleh Notaris dalam Pembuktian di Sidang Pengadilan. Tesis. Semarang: Universitas Islam Sultan Agung.

Subekti, R. (2014). Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: Intermasa.

Sudarmadi, Ari Cahyo. (2017). Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Kredit Melalui Akta Notaris dan Akibat Hukumnya Ketika Terjadi Wanprestasi di Bank Jateng Banjarnegara. Tesis Magister. Semarang: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Sultan Agung.

Regulation:

Republic of Indonesia. Civil Code.

Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 10 of 1998 concerning Banking.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Editorial Office: TABELLIUS: Journal of Law Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455

Phone: 024-6583584 (574)
Email : tabelius@unissula.ac.id