Legal Implications Of Ownership Of Multiple Land Rights Certificates By Buyers In Good Faith (Study of Decision Number 940 PK/Pdt/2020)

Muhammad Ilham Arbanu, Gunarto Gunarto

Abstract


The emergence of these cases of duplicate certificates certainly makes people worried that if they buy land, it turns out that the certificate is double or multiple. This issue becomes interesting when linked to a person's good faith legally as regulated in Article 1338 paragraph (3) of the Civil Code (KUHPerdata). This study aims to understand and analyze the legal considerations of the Judge in adjudicating land rights sale and purchase disputes in decision Number 940 PK/Pdt/2020 and the legal implications for the ownership of dual land rights certificates by buyers in good faith. This type of research uses normative juridical research, namely legal research that positions law as a system of norms using case approach methods, statutory approaches and conceptual approaches. The results of the study indicate that the judge's legal considerations in adjudicating the land rights sale and purchase dispute in decision number 940 PK / Pdt / 2020, the reason for the review cannot be justified, because after examining the Review Memorandum dated May 20, 2020 and May 28, 2020 and the Counter Review Memorandum dated June 10, 2020 in connection with the considerations and decisions of the judex juris, there was no error by the judge or a clear error and the new evidence (novum) submitted was not decisive in the a quo decision. The legal implications for the ownership of dual certificates of land rights by buyers in good faith cause great losses. In this case, Melyanti as a buyer feels very disadvantaged because she has to return the land title certificate due to the decision of the Panel of Judges stating that Melyanti is not a buyer in good faith.


Keywords


Double Certificate; Good Faith Buyer; Ownership.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Agus Salim, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Sertifikat Hak Milik Dengan Adanya Penerbitan Sertifikat Ganda”, Jurnal USM Law Review, Vol 2 No 2.

Andewi Suhartini, 2010, “Belajar Tuntas: Latar Belakang, Tujuan, Dan Implikasi”, Jurnal Pendidikan, Vol. 10, No. 1.

Aprilio Mirtha Lutfiyansyah dan Yunita Reykasari, 2021, “Akibat Hukum Dikeluarkannya Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah Ganda Ditinjau Dari Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pendaftaran Tanah”, Artikel, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember.

Daniel Pangidoan, 2022, “Analisis Yuridis Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Sertipikat Ganda Hak Atas Tanah Di Pengadilan Negeri”, Jurnal SEIKAT, Vol. 1 No. 2.

Hasim Hartono dan Rachmad Al Aziz, 2022, “Akibat Hukum Pembatalan Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Jual Beli Tanah Oleh Ptun Kendari (Studi Putusan no 07/GTUN/2007/PTUN-Kdi)”, Jurnal Delarev, Vol. 1 No. 2.

Husnul Munfarid, dkk, 2014, “Implikasi Yuridis Jual Beli Tanah yang Tidak Dilakukan di Hadapan PPAT Terhadap Proses Pendaftaran dan Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah (Analisis Putusan No. 18/Pdt. G/2012/PN. Lmg)”, Desertasi Doktoral, Universitas Brawijaya.

Iwan Permadi, 2016, “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pembeli Tanah Bersertifikat Ganda dengan Cara Itikad Baik Demi Kepastian Hukum”, Yustisia, Vol. 5 No. 2.

Maya Anas Taqiyyah dan Atik Winanti, 2020, “Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Sertifikat Atas Tanah Ganda Berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 24 Tahun 1997”, Jurnal Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-Undangan dan Pranata Sosial, Vol. 5 No. 1.

Muhammad Amin, dkk, 2023, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pembeli Beritikad Baik Pada Jual Beli Hak Atas Tanah”, Collegium Studiosum Journal, Vol. 6 No. 2.

Rani, Arvita, 2016, “Kedudukan Badan Pertanahan Nasional dalam Menghadapi Problematik Putusan Non-Executable PTUN Tentang Pembatalan Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah”, Jurnal Media Hukum, Vol, 23 No. 1.

Supriyadi, 2019, “Reorientasi Asas Itikad Baik/Kebenaran Sebagai Dasar Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah”, Jurnal HUMANI (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani), Vol. 9 No. 1.

T. Latiful, dkk, 2023, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pembeli Yang Beritikad Baik (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Banda Aceh Nomor 67/PDT/2015/PT-BNA)”, Suloh: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, Vol. 11 No. 2.

Books:

Abdul Rahman Ghazaly, dkk, 2010, Fiqh Muamalat, Cet ke-1, Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.

_______, 2008, Fiqh Munakahat, Cet. ke-1, Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.

Abdulkadir Muhammad, 2000, Hukum Perdata Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Achmad Ali, 2002, Menguak Tabir Hukum (Suatu Kajian Filosofis dan Sosiologis), Toko Gunung Agung, Jakarta.

Adrian Sutedi, 2013, Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah dan Pendaftarannya, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

_______, 2018, Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah dan Pendaftarannya, Cet. 9, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Agus Yudha Hernoko, 2011, Hukum Kontrak Asas Proporsionalitas dalam Perjanjian Komersial, Kencana, Jakarta.

Ahmadi Miru, 2011, Hukum Kontrak Perancangan Kontrak, PT Rajawali Press, Jakarta.

_______,2014, Hukum Kontrak dan Perancangan Kontrak, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Anonim, 2007, Petunjuk teknis Direktorat Survey dan Potensi Tanah, Deputi Survey, Pengukuran dan Pemetaan BPN RI, Jakarta.

Bachsan Mustafa, 2003, Sistem Hukum Indonesia Terpadu, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Boedi Harsono, 2003, Hukum Agraria Indonesia Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria Isi Dan Pelaksanaaanya, Djambatan, Jakarta.

_______,2003, Hukum Agraria Indonesia, (Edisi Revisi), Penerbit Djambatan, Jakarta.

_______,1999, Hukum Agraria Indonesia Sejarah Pembentukan UU Pokok Agraria, Djambatan Boedi, Jakarta.

Burhan Ashofa, 2000, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Chainur Arrasjid, 2005, Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum, Rajawali Press, Surabaya.

Chairun Pasribu dan Suharawardi Lubis, Hukum Perjanjian dalam Islam, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2011.

Dominikus Rato, 2010, Filsafat Hukum: Mencari dan Memahami Hukum, Laksbang Pressindo, Yogyakarta.

Dyara Radhite Oryza Fea, 2018, Panduan Mengurus Tanah dan Perizinannya, Legality, Yogyakarta.

Effendy Perangin, 2005, Hukum Agraria di Indonesia, Suatu Telaah dari Sudut Pandang Praktisi Hukum, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Hendi Suhendi, 2007, Fiqh Muamalah, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Kartini Muljadi dkk, 2006, Perikatan yang Lahir dari Perjanjian, Kencana, Jakarta.

Regulation:

Circular Letter of the Supreme Court Number 4 of 2016 concerning the Implementation of the Formulation of the Results of the Plenary Meeting of the Supreme Court Chamber in 2016 as a Guideline for the Implementation of Duties for the Court.

Civil Code

Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021 concerning Management Rights, Land Rights, Apartment Units, and Land Registration

Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Principles

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.5.1.331-346

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: