Effectiveness of Destruction of Narcotics Evidence in Criminal Cases with Permanent Legal Force (Case Study at the East Kutai District Prosecutor's Office)
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the implementation of destroying narcotics evidence in criminal cases that have reached final judgment in the Kutai Timur District Attorney's Office, the challenges faced and the solutions implemented, as well as the prospects for strengthening regulations and destruction practices in the future. The research method used is a qualitative approach with a case study, supported by in-depth interviews with prosecutors, law enforcement officials, and other relevant parties. The research findings indicate that the destruction of evidence at the East Kutai District Attorney's Office has been procedurally effective and accountable, but still faces legal, technical, budgetary, inter-agency coordination, and public trust challenges. The solutions implemented include accelerating administrative procedures, modernizing facilities, cross-agency coordination, information digitalization, and staff training. For the future, strengthening responsive regulations, modernizing facilities, structured coordination, public transparency, and budget support are seen as capable of enhancing the effectiveness, safety, and legitimacy of destroying narcotic evidence. The findings of this research provide recommendations for law enforcement, policymakers, and the public to actively participate in supporting sustainable and reliable disposal practices.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al-Quran:
QS. al-Nahl: 70.
Journals:
Amalia, Hikmah Putri, Naida Andhita Pasa, and Salsabila Nur Sahara D. “Problematika Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Narkotika Di Indonesia.” Ma’mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah Dan Hukum 5, no. 3 (2024): 279–96. https://doi.org/10.15642/mal.v5i3.367.
Anggie Johar, Olivia, Fahmi, and Mahfira Yana. “Penyimpanan Barang Bukti Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Peraturan Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 08 Tahun 2014 Tentang Tata Cara Pengelolaan Barang Bukti Di Polres Kuantan Singingi.” Prosiding Senkim: Seminar Nasional Karya Ilmiah Multidisiplin 1, no. 1 (2022): 124–33. https://journal.unilak.ac.id/index.php/senkim/article/view/11315.
Djaenab. “Efektifitas Dan Berfungsinya Hukum Dalam Masyarakat.” Ash-Shahabah Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Islam 4, no. 2 (2018): 148–53.
Djiwandono, Delvino Aldy, Felicia Tanalina Ylma, and Diqa Qothrunnada Amanda Nur Sella. “Prinsip Exclusionary Rules of Evidence Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Narkotika.” UNES Law Review 6, no. 4 (2024): 12066–80. https://review-unes.com/index.php/law/article/view/2064%0Ahttps://review-unes.com/index.php/law/article/download/2064/1777.
Erwin, Syamsuddin Pasamai, Anzar. “Eksekusi Jaksa Penuntut Umum Atas Putusan Hakim Yang Tidak Memerintahkan Penahanan Terhadap Terdakwa.” Journal of Lex Generalis (JLS) 2, no. 2 (2021): 467–69.
Galih Orlando. “Efektivitas Hukum Dan Fungsi Hukum Di Indonesia.” Tarbiyah Bil Qalam : Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Dan Sains 6, no. 1 (2022): 49–58. https://doi.org/10.58822/tbq.v6i1.77.
Ida Bagus Angga Prawiradana, Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini, Ratna Artha Windaari. “Peran Kepolisian Dalam Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Narkotika Di Kabupaten Buleleng.” E-Journal Komunitas Yustisia Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Jurusan Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 3 (2018): 196–205.
Johan Nasution, Bahder. “Kajian Filosofis Tentang Konsep Keadilan Dari Pemikiran Klasik Sampai Pemikiran Modern.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 3, no. 2 (2014). https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v3i2.11106.
Joshua, Peter, and Lumban Raja. “Peranan Kejaksaan Dalam Pengelolan Barang Bukti Dan Barang Rampasan.” Journal Of Social Science Research 4 (2024): 6022–31.
Lestari, Vian Dwi. “Implementasi Efektifitas Pengendalian Intern Pada Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Penggajian.” Jurnal Riset Mahasiswa Ekonomi (RITMIK) 5, no. 1 (2023): 49–61.
RAMA, HELENA AFRIANI, and ESA WAHYU ENDARTI. “Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Program Pembangunan Infrastruktur Selama Masa Pendemi Covid 19.” JISP (Jurnal Inovasi Sektor Publik) 2, no. 3 (2023): 13–24. https://doi.org/10.38156/jisp.v2i3.151.
Rohmawati, Afifatu. “Efektivitas Pembelajaran.” Simulation & Games 3, no. 2 (1972): 203–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/003755007200300206.
Roni Gunawan Raja Gukguk, and Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya. “Tindak Pidana Narkotika Sebagai Transnasional Organized Crime.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 1, no. 3 (2019): 337–51.
Suganda, Rangga. “Metode Pendekatan Yuridis Dalam Memahami Sistem Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam 8, no. 3 (2022): 2859. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v8i3.6485.
Supit, Allan Rouwman. “Pelaksanaan Puutusan Perkara Pidana Yang Telah Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.” Lex Privatum IV, no. 7 (2016): 117–23.
Supranto, J. Metode Penelitian Hukum Dan Statistik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2003.
Suyanto, Heru, and Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar. “Paradigma Keadilan : Konsep Dan Praktek.” Jurnal De Lege Ferenda Trisakti 9, no. 2 (2023): 9–17. https://doi.org/10.25105/ferenda.v1i1.16551.
Tiara, Salman, and Arrie Budhiartie. “Analisis Konsep Keadilan Dalam Pandangan Filsafat Hukum Aristoteles Dan Relevansinya Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Nalar Keadilan 19, no. 2 (2024): 1–9.
Wahyudia Putri, Sekar Balqis Safitra Rizki. “Analisis Teori Tujuan Hukum Gustav Radbruch Dalam Kedudukan Majelis Penyelesaian Perselisihan Medis Dalam Undang - Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kesehatan.” SANGAJI : Jurnal Pemikiran Syariah Dan Hukum 8, no. 2 (2024): 315–26. https://doi.org/10.52266/sangaji.v8i2.3463.
Wiantama, I Putu Krisna llham, I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha, and Ida Ayu Putu Widiati. “Mekanisme Penyimpanan Dan Pemusnahan Barang Sitaan Narkotika (Studi Kasus Pada Kejaksaan Negeri Badung).” Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum 2, no. 2 (2021): 315–19. https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.2.2.3229.315-319.
Books:
Ali, Mahrus. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2002.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi Dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.
Auda, Jasser. Maqasid Al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. London: The International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2007.
Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. KBBI Daring. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Republik Indonesia, 2023.
Friedman, Lawrence W. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1975.
Hamzah, Andi. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2021.
Harahap, Yahya. Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019.
Kaelan. Pendidikan Pancasila. Yogyakarta: Paradigma, 2017.
Moeljatno. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Bina Aksara, 2002.
Muladi. Kebijakan Kriminal. Semarang: UNDIP Press, 1995.
Muladi dan barda Nawawi Arief. Teori-Teori Dan Kebijakan Pidana. Bandung: Alumni, 2010.
Mulyadi, Lilik. Hukum Acara Pidana: Teori Dan Praktik Peradilan Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni, 2016.
Nawawi, Imam. Shahih Muslim Bi Syarh Imam An Nawawi. Libanon: Beirut, 2006.
Reksodiputro, Mardjono. Kriminologi Dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jakarta: UI Press, 2010.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Efektivitas Hukum Dan Penerapan Sanksi. Bandung: Ramadja Karya, 1988.
Regulation:
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law (KUHAP).
Law Number 16 of 2004 in conjunction with Law Number 11 of 2021 concerning the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia.
Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics.
Regulation of the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia Number 7 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Regulation of the Attorney General Number PER-036/A/JA/09/2011 concerning Standard Operating Procedures for Handling Evidence and Confiscated Goods at the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia.
Head of BNN Regulation 7 of 2010 concerning Technical Guidelines for Safe Handling and Destruction of Confiscated Narcotics, Narcotics Precursors and Other Chemicals.
Internet:
https://bnn.go.id/konten/unggahan/2024/12/23122024-FINAL-PRESS-RELEASE-AKHIR-TAHUN-2024-COMPILE-ALL.pdf, Accessed on 22 August 2025.
“Kejari Kutim Musnahkan Barang Bukti Narkotika Hingga Sajam Dari 244 Perkara Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap,” Kaltim Post, https://kaltimpost.jawapos.com/kutai-timur/2386216932/kejari-kutim-musnahkan-barang-bukti-narkotika-hingga-sajam-dari-244-perkara-berkekuatan-hukum-tetap, Accessed on 22 August 2025.
https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kejaksaan_Republik_Indonesia, Accessed on 22 August 2025.
https://pid.kepri.polri.go.id/apaitu-pemusnahan-barang-bukti/, Accessed on 22 August 2025.
Interview:
Interview with the Functional Prosecutor as a resource person from the East Kutai District Attorney's Office, on 27 August 2025.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.4.5534-5551
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: