Legal Responsibility for Perpetrators of Criminal Acts of Threats (Study of Decision No. 29/PID.B/2025/PN TNN)
Abstract
This research is motivated by the growing forms of criminal threats that occur not only physically but also through digital media in line with technological advances. This phenomenon poses a danger to the sense of security within society and demands the assurance of legal certainty and justice in the enforcement of criminal law. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the construction of the criminal act of threat within the concept of legal certainty and to examine the legal responsibility of the perpetrator based on Decision Number 29/Pid.B/2025/PN Tondano. This research employs a normative (doctrinal) legal research method with several approaches, namely the statute approach, case approach, and conceptual approach. The analysis was conducted qualitatively to identify the application of legal norms to the factual circumstances revealed during the trial. This normative approach was chosen to ensure that the discussion of the criminal liability of perpetrators of threats is examined systematically, logically, and in accordance with the prevailing principles of criminal law. The findings of this study indicate that the criminal act of threat constitutes a formal offense, which is considered complete once the threat is made and induces a real sense of fear in the victim, without requiring any physical consequences. The Panel of Judges in Court Decision Number 29/Pid.B/2025/PN Tondano declared that the defendant was legally and convincingly proven guilty of committing the crime of threat and sentenced him to one (1) year of imprisonment. This decision reflects the application of the principles of nullum crimen sine lege and nulla poena sine lege, ensuring legal certainty while demonstrating a balance between substantive justice, victim protection, and offender rehabilitation. Therefore, this research is expected to contribute academically to the development of Indonesian criminal law that upholds justice and promotes the protection of human rights.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al-Qur’an:
QS. Al-Ahzab
Journals:
Arifin, Z. (2024). Teori Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dalam Praktik Peradilan Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Unissula, 41(2), 199–216.
Bakhri, S. (2022). Reformasi Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Sultan Agung, 39(1), 90–105.
Fauzan, R. (2023). Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Hukuman Pidana Pengancaman. Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, 15(3), 88–101.
Haryanto, T. (2022). Utility dan Efektivitas Pemidanaan dalam Delik Pengancaman. Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, 14(2), 65–80.
Jurnal Hukum Sultan Agung. (2024). Perlindungan Korban dalam Tindak Pidana Pengancaman. Jurnal Hukum Sultan Agung, 40(2), 200–215.
Jurnal Hukum Sultan Agung. (2024). Reformasi Perlindungan Korban dalam Tindak Pidana Pengancaman. Jurnal Hukum Sultan Agung, 40(2), 200–215.
Jurnal Khaira Ummah. (2023). Psikologi Hukum dalam Perlindungan Korban. Jurnal Khaira Ummah, 15(3), 88–101.
Kurniawan, F. (2024). Analisis Dakwaan Alternatif dalam Perkara Pidana. Jurnal Khaira Ummah, 16(1), 100–118.
Lestari, D. (2023). Ancaman Kekerasan sebagai Unsur Pengancaman dalam KUHP. Jurnal Hukum Unissula, 40(3), 210–225.
Mashdurohatun, A. (2023). Sinergi Penegakan Hukum dan Perlindungan Korban. Jurnal Hukum Sultan Agung, 39(2), 145–165.
Nugroho, A. (2023). Kepastian Hukum dalam Penegakan Pasal 335 KUHP. Jurnal Khaira Ummah, 15(2), 145–158.
Pratama, R. (2023). Efek Jera dalam Perspektif Teori Pemidanaan Modern. Jurnal Hukum Unissula, 41(1), 115–130.
Putra, B. (2024). Proporsionalitas Penerapan Pasal 335 KUHP. Jurnal Hukum Sultan Agung, 41(2), 134–150.
Rizal, M. C. (2023). Pembenaran dan Pemaaf dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Sultan Agung, 35(2), 122–135.
Setiyono, H. (2022). Kesalahan Individu dalam Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Jurnal Khaira Ummah, 14(1), 55–67.
Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2021). Keadilan Substantif dalam Putusan Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Sultan Agung, 37(3), 201–220.
Zulkarnain, M. (2023). Pencegahan Kejahatan dengan Instrumen Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Sultan Agung, 40(1), 170–189.
Books:
Abu Dawud. (2009). Sunan Abi Dawud. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
Al-Ghazali, A. H. (1997). Al-Mustashfa min ‘Ilm al-Usul (Vol. 2). Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
Al-Jaziri, A. (1990). Al-Fiqh ‘Ala al-Madzahib al-Arba’ah. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
Al-Mawardi, A. (1996). Al-Ahkam al-Sultaniyyah. Kairo: Dar al-Hadits.
Al-Suyuthi, J. (1998). Al-Asybah wa al-Nazha’ir. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
Al-Zuhayli, W. (1989). Al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuh (Vol. 6). Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr.
Arief, B. N. (2010). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana.
Arief, B. N. (2019). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Perlindungan Masyarakat. Jakarta: Kencana.
Abu Dawud, S. ibn al-As. (2009). Sunan Abi Dawud. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Kamali, M. H. (2008). Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence. Cambridge: Islamic Texts Society.
Kartono, K. (2005). Patologi Sosial dan Kriminologi. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Lamintang, P. A. F. (2013). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Lamintang, P. A. F. (2014). Delik-Delik Tertentu di dalam KUHP. Bandung: Sinar Baru.
Marzuki, P. M. (2015). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Moeljatno. (2008). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Muladi, M. (2018). Humanisme dalam Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Nasution, A. (2012). Hukum Pidana Islam. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Priyatno, D. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Prodjodikoro, W. (1989). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Bandung: Eresco.
Rahardjo, S. (2000). Hukum dalam Perspektif Sosial. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Soekanto, S. (2012). Hukum Adat Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Soekanto, S. (2012). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.
Regulation:
Criminal Code. Article 335 paragraph (1).
Ternate District Court. (2025). Decision Number 29/Pid.B/2025/PN Tnn.
Etc:
Berbagai artikel dalam Jurnal Hukum Unissula (2021–2024) terkait pertanggungjawaban pidana, perlindungan korban, dan kebijakan kriminal.
Radbruch, G. (2006). Legal Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.4.5886-5902
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: