Implementation of Prosecutor's Asset Confiscation Regulations in the Framework of Corruption Criminal Acts Recovery Based on Legal Certainty (Case Study of the Subang District Attorney's Office)

Bayu Bayu

Abstract


Corruption is a serious issue confronting Indonesia, including Subang Regency, with significant repercussions on regional economic growth, public trust, and equitable resource distribution. Asset forfeiture, as an anti-corruption strategy, plays a pivotal role in recovering state losses, deterring corrupt practices, and fostering national development. However, the implementation of asset forfeiture must ensure justice, utility, and legal certainty for all stakeholders. This study aims to analyze and understand the implementation of asset forfeiture regulations by the Prosecutor's Office in recovering assets derived from corruption, focusing on legal certainty and the effectiveness of asset recovery. Specifically, this research will address questions regarding the implementation of asset forfeiture regulations by the Prosecutor's Office, the weaknesses of such implementation, and the implementation of asset forfeiture regulations based on legal certainty. This research employs a socio-legal research method, encompassing the examination of legal norms and the context of law enforcement. Using a descriptive-analytical approach, this study analyzes the implementation of asset forfeiture regulations by the Prosecutor's Office in recovering assets derived from corruption. Secondary data is obtained through literature review and analyzed qualitatively to understand the data's meaning. Based on the research findings and discussion, it can be concluded that the implementation of asset forfeiture regulations by the Prosecutor's Office in recovering assets derived from corruption in Indonesia still faces several challenges. Firstly, the implementation of asset forfeiture regulations currently relies on scattered legal foundations, including the Criminal Procedure Code, the Corruption Eradication Law, and the Money Laundering Law, and can be pursued through both criminal and civil mechanisms. Second, the weaknesses of implementing asset forfeiture regulations by the Prosecutor's Office in recovering assets derived from corruption in Indonesia still face various issues, such as a lack of resources and technology, difficulties in proving the origin of assets, and a lack of public awareness and legal compliance. Thirdly, the implementation of asset forfeiture regulations by the Prosecutor's Office in recovering assets derived from corruption based on legal certainty is still hindered by the absence of a specific and comprehensive Asset Forfeiture Law, resulting in inconsistencies in the application of the law.


Keywords


Asset; Certainty; Corruption; Forfeiture; Legal.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Akbar, Muhammad Rizky, Dea Pratama Putri, dan Nor Sapitri. “Korupsi Dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Daerah: Kajian Literatur.” Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial 2, no. 11, 2025.

Amin, Muhammad Nur, Bambang Sugianto, dan Riko Anggara Putra. Kewenangan Kejaksaan Meletakkan Sita Pidana Aset Pidana Korupsi. Nusa Tenggara Timur: Tangguh Denara Jaya, 2024.

Arini Indika Arifin. “Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menurut Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam.” Lex et Societatis III, no. 1 (2015).

Bambang Tri Bawono. “The Strategy For Handling Corruption’s Criminal Action Relationship To Saving Of State Financial Losses.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 7, no. 3 (2020): 223.

Dian Aulia, Risa Amalia, Tarisya Arliani Munandar. “Dinamika Korupsi dan Dampaknya Pada Pembangunan Nasional.” Aliansi : Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora 1, no. 3 (2024): 13.

Easter, Lalola, Kurnia Ramadhana, dan Diky Anandya. “Ringkasan Penelitian Urgensi Pengaturan Sita Jaminan dalam Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jakarta, 2022.

Fadhli, Ashabul, Amri Amir, Syamsuriul, Muhammad Elvi Syam, Indra Legiono, Isra Mardi, dan Al Ikhlas. Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Malang: Madza Media, 2022.

Faridzi, Mohammad Al, dan Gunawan Nachrawi. “Kualifikasi Kejahatan Luar Biasa Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 301 K/Pid.Sus/2021).” Jurnal Kewarganegaraan 6, no. 2 (2022): 3015.

Fitriyanti, Lisa Dwi, dan Agus Suwandono. “Perampasan Aset Sebagai Sanksi Tambahan : Analisis Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia.” JAKSA – Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik 3, no. 3 (2025): 15.

Gunawan, Arief, dan Andri Winjaya Laksana. “Effectiveness of Law Enforcement in Investigation of Criminal Acts of Corruption.” Ratio Legis Journal 2023, no. 2 (2023).

Gustav Redbruch. “Statutory Lawlesness and Suprastatutory Kaw.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26, no. 1 (2006).

Hafidz, Jawade. “Efektifitas Pelaksanaan Sistem Pembuktian Terbalik Terhadap Perkara Korupsi Dalam Mewujudkan Negara Hukum Di Indonesia.” Sultan Agung XLIV, no. 118 (2009).

Hafidz, Jawade, dan Agung Widodo. “Pelanggaran Perpres Nomor 54 Tahun 2010 Tentang Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Pemerintah Oleh Penyedia Barang Dan Jasa Atau Pengguna Jasa Dalam Perspektif Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum II, no. 2 (2015).

Harun, Nurlaila. “Keadilan dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam.” I’tisham : Journal of Islamic Law and Economics 1, no. 2 (2021).

Herman, KMS, dan Rusman. “Asset Forfeiture: A Blueprint for Justice, Legal Reform and Corruption Eradication.” Yustisia Tirtayasa 5, no. 1 (2025).

Hutmi Amivia Ilma. “Tantangan Mekanisme Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset di Indonesia.” Ma’Mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah dan Hukum 5, no. 4 (2024): 328. Rwan

Hafid. “Perampasan Aset Tanpa Pemidanaan Dalam Perspektif Economic Analysis Of Law.” Lex Renaissance 1, no. 6 (2021): 466.

Josephine Rachelle Parulina, Nuswantoro Dwiwarno, dan Darminto Hartono Paulus. “Upaya Pemulihan Aset (Asset Recovery) Lintas Batas Negara di Wilayah Asia Tenggara.” Diponegoro Law Journal 12, no. 1 (2023): 15.

Juliardi, Budi, Yoan Barbara Runtunuwu, Mohammad Hendy Musthofa, TL Andi Darmawansya, Arini Asriyani, dan Raju Moh Hazmi. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Padang: CV Gita Lentera, 2023.

Khasan, Moh., dan Ja’far Baehaqi. Perampasan Aset Terpidana Korupsi dalam Kajian Hukum Pidana dan Fiqh Jinayah. Semarang: CV Alinea Media Dipantara, 2021.

Nugrah, Sigit Prabawa. “Kebijakan Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” In Procceding: Call for Paper National Conference For Law Studies: Pembangunan Hukum Menuju Era Digital Society, 988. Jakarta: Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, 2020.

Paryadi. “Maqashid Syariah : Definisi Dan Pendapat Para Ulama.” Jurnal Alwatzikhoebillah 4, no. 2 (2021).

Pradana, Yudha Aditya, dan Ariawan Gunadi. “Politik Hukum Dalam Penguatan Integritas Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia Sebagai Pilar Penegakan Hukum Yang Berkeadilan.” Rewang Rencang : Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 5, no. 10 (2024).

Putra, Nandha Risky, dan Rosa Linda. “Korupsi di Indonesia: Tantangan Perubahan Sosial.” Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi 8, no. 1 (2022).

Rena Yulia. “Hakikat Pengembalian Kerugian Negara; Sebuah Penghukuman Buat Pelaku Atau Pemulihan Bagi Korban?” Lex Lata Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 1 (2020): 373.

Sadeli, Wahyudi Hafiluddin. “Implikasi Perampasan Aset Terhadap Pihak Ketiga Yang Terkait Dengan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” UniversItas Indonesia, 2010.

Books:

Anwar, Adang Yesmil. Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Bandung: Widya Padajajaran, 2011.

Arsyad, Jawade Hafidz. Korupsi dalam perspektif HAN (Hukum Administrasi Negara). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013.

Arto, A. Mukti. Mencari Keadilan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Ilmu, 2001.

Bagir Manan. Sistem Peradilan Berwibawa (Suatu Pencarian). Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung RI, 2007.

Bayley, David H. Bunga Rampai Korupsi. Jakarta: LP3ES, 1995.

Hadjon, Philipus Mandiri. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press, 1995.

Hehamuha, Abdullah. Membangun Gerakan Antikorupsi Dalam Perspektif Pengadilan. Malang: LP3 UMY, 2004.

HR, Ridwan. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2002.

Ibrahim, Johnny. Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif,. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2012.

Ilmi, Musfiratul. “Penyitaan Berbasis Properti Sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Universitas Hasanuddin, 2022.

International, Transparency. Laporan Korupsi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Transparency International, 2022.

IIrwansyah, dan Ahsan Yunus. Penelitian Hukum Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media, 2021.

Kusumaatmadja, Mochtar, dan Bernard Arief Sidharta. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Alumni, 2020.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Penegakan Hukum : Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis. Yogyakarta: Genta Publisihing, 2009.

Wibowo, Agus, Ratnawati, Asri Reni Handayani, Zico Junius Fernando, Elizawarda, Dina Indriyanti, Alif Lukmanul Hakim, et al. Pengetahuan Dasar Antikorupsi dan Integritas. Bandung: CV Media Sains Indonesia, 2020.

Widyo Promono. Pemberantasan Korupsi dan Pidana Lainnya Sebuah Perspektif Jaksa & Guru Besar. Jakarta: Buku Kompas, 2017.

Widyopramono. Peran Kejaksaan Terhadap Aset Recovery Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Yogyakarta, 2014.

Yanto, Oksidelfa. Negara Hukum: Kepastian, Keadilan, dan Kemanfaatan Hukum (Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia). Bandung: Penerbit Pustaka Reka Cipta, 2020.

Zuhaili, Wahbah. Konsep Darurat Dalam Hukum Islam (Studi Banding Dengan Hukum Positif). Jakarta: Gaya Media Pratama, 1997.

Regulation:

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD 1945).

Law Number 1 of 1946 concerning Criminal Law Regulations (Criminal Code (KUHP))

Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Code (Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP))

Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption.

Law Number 11 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia.

Prosecutor's Regulation Number 67 of 2012 concerning the Prosecutor's Code of Conduct.

Regulation of the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia Number: Per - 013/A/JA/06/2014.

Attorney General Regulation Number 20 of 2017 concerning Procedures for Securing Confiscated and Confiscated Goods

Prosecutor's Regulation Number 7 of 2020 concerning Guidelines for Asset Recovery

Attorney General's Letter Number: B765/F/Fd.1/04/2018 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Handling Corruption Crimes at the Investigation Stage

Etc:

Mon. “MA Perberat Hukuman Mantan Bupati Kendal.” hukumonline.com, 2008. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/ma-perberat-hukuman-mantan-bupati-kendal-hol19411#!




DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.4.5321-5343

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: