Legal Review of Corporate Criminal Liability in Traffic Accidents and The Concept of Law Enforcement Reviewed Based on Law Number 22 of 2009 Concerning Road Traffic and Transportation

Habib Lutfi Suhermanto, Aji Sudarmaji

Abstract


This study examines the regulation and implementation of corporate criminal liability in traffic accident cases based on Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Traffic and Road Transportation (LLAJ Law), with a case study at the Cirebon City Police. Theoretically, this research employs Peter Salim's Theory of Legal Responsibility and Soerjono Soekanto's Theory of Law Enforcement. The analysis shows that although the LLAJ Law provides a strong legal basis for prosecuting corporations through the obligation to ensure vehicle roadworthiness and operational safety, field implementation still faces significant obstacles. Law enforcement tends to be individualistic, focusing solely on the driver as the suspect. The main barriers include limited investigator competence in identifying corporate structural negligence, a lack of technical identification facilities, and a legal culture that does not yet demand corporate accountability. Proposed strategies to achieve legal certainty, justice, and public protection include strengthening structural audits of company management, enhancing investigators' technical capacity, and integrating administrative vehicle data between the police and the transportation department.


Keywords


Corporate Criminal Liability; Law Enforcement Concept; Roadworthiness; Structural Negligence; Traffic Accidents.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Aulia, R. (2020). "Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas." Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, 12(2), 45-60.

Prasetyo, T. (2019). "Aspek Hukum Pidana Korporasi di Indonesia: Perspektif Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas." Jurnal Hukum Pidana, 10(1), 78-90.

Sari, M. (2022). "Penegakan Hukum Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas yang Melibatkan Korporasi di Indonesia." Jurnal Penegakan Hukum, 17(4), 130-145.

Utami, D. (2018). "Tanggung Jawab Pidana Korporasi dalam Kasus Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas di Indonesia." Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia, 9(2), 25-40.

Wicaksono, A. (2021). "Tinjauan Hukum tentang Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas yang Melibatkan Korporasi." Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15(3), 102-117.

Books:

Ali, M. (2015). Hukum Pidana Korporasi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Arief, B. N. (2010). Kebijakan Legislasi dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Penerbit PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Simanjuntak, H. (2016). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Sistem Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Sudarto. (2013). Hukum dan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.

Wirjono Prodjodikoro. (2012). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Jakarta: Dian Rakyat.

Regulation:

Criminal Code (KUHP).

Government Regulation Number 55 of 2012 concerning Vehicles.

Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Traffic and Road Transportation.

Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies.

Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law.

Internet:

Hukumonline. (2020). Corporate Liability in Traffic Accidents According to Law Number 22 of 2009. Accessed from:https://www.hukumonline.com

Ministry of Transportation of the Republic of Indonesia. (2021). The Role of Corporations in Traffic Accidents in Indonesia. Retrieved from: https://www.dephub.go.id

National Legal Development Agency. (2022). Law Enforcement in Traffic Accidents Involving Corporations. Retrieved from: https://www.bphn.go.id

Setiawan, A. (2021). A Legal Study of Traffic Accidents by Corporations in Indonesia. Retrieved from:https://www.jurnalhukum.ac.id




DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.4.4857-4876

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: