Formulation of Criminal Sanctions for Drug Abuse Perpetrators Based on Justice Values
Abstract
The application of criminal sanctions has so far focused on imprisonment, not reflecting substantive justice. This study uses a normative juridical method to analyze the application of sanctions to drug abusers, the obstacles encountered, and the formulation of just sanctions. The results show that drug abusers are often treated as criminals, rather than victims of addiction. The main obstacles include the unclear distinction between users and dealers, limited rehabilitation facilities, and the weak understanding of Article 127 of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics by officials. Sanction formulations that emphasize rehabilitation, perpetrator differentiation, and the application of Pancasila values are needed so that criminalization not only provides a deterrent effect but also restores perpetrators to become productive members of society.
Keywords
References
Journals:
Dwi Handayani. “Pendekatan Restoratif dalam Penanganan Penyalahguna Narkotika.” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, Vol. 51 No. 2 (2021), hlm. 243.
Putra, I. G. N. “Pemidanaan Berbasis Nilai-Nilai Keadilan Pancasila.” Jurnal Filsafat Hukum Indonesia, Vol. 4 No. 2, 2022.
Suharsil. “Pendekatan Restoratif dalam Pemidanaan Penyalahguna Narkotika.” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, Vol. 50 No. 3, 2020.
Wibowo, A. “Rehabilitasi sebagai Alternatif Pemidanaan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Reformasi, Vol. 8 No. 1, 2021.
Books:
Ali, Zainuddin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.
Andi Hamzah. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2019.
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana, 2010.
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Kebijakan Legislatif dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Jakarta: Kencana, 2013.
Atmasasmita, Romli. Sistem Peradilan Pidana: Perspektif Eksistensialisme dan Abolisionisme. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2011.
Badan Narkotika Nasional (BNN). Laporan Tahunan Penanganan Rehabilitasi Narkotika 2023.
Bentham, Jeremy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1789.
BNN dan Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tim Asesmen Terpadu (TAT), 2022.
Eastwood, N., Fox, E., & Rosmarin, A. A Quiet Revolution: Drug Decriminalisation Policies in Practice Across the Globe. Release, 2016.
Hamzah, Andi. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2019.
Marpaung, L. Asas-Asas dan Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana.
Muladi & Arief, B. N. “Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana.”
Muladi. Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Bandung: Alumni, 1995.
Muladi. Lembaga Pidana dan Pemidanaan. Bandung: Alumni, 1995.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. Hukum Progresif: Hukum yang Membebaskan. Jakarta: Kompas, 2005.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. Hukum Progresif: Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.
Sudarto. Hukum dan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni, 1986.
Zainuddin Ali. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014, hlm. 105.
Regulation:
Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics.
Etc:
Berkas Tuntutan Penuntut Umum dalam Perkara Nomor 288/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Kwg.
Data Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Tahun 2021–2023. Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Umum.
Pertimbangan Majelis Hakim dalam Putusan Nomor 288/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Kwg.
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Karawang Nomor 288/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Kwg.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.4.%25p
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: