Criminal Law Policy in an Efforts to Overcome Criminal Act of Accepting

M. Hafiz Ananda, Ahmad Hadi Prayitno

Abstract


The crime of receiving stolen property is a form of crime against property that plays a crucial role in strengthening the chain of crime. Without a party willing to buy or sell the proceeds of crime, the economic motivation of perpetrators of predicate crimes, such as theft, is reduced. However, current criminal law policies remain partial and tend to be repressive, focusing more on punishing perpetrators after the crime has occurred.The author formulated 2 (two) things, namely: (1) criminal law policy in efforts to overcome the crime of receiving money in the positive law that is currently in force, and (2) updating the criminal law policy regarding the crime of receiving money as regulated in Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (KUHP). This research uses a normative juridical approach. Based on the research results, it was found thatshows that the regulation of the crime of receiving money in Article 480 of the Criminal Code still has weaknesses, particularly in the element of "knowing or reasonably suspecting" which is difficult to prove, and is unable to anticipate technology-based crime methods. Meanwhile, Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (KUHP) shows a direction for reform by expanding the formulation of the crime of receiving money, clarifying the element of guilt, and adjusting the penalty to be more proportional. Therefore, an integrative criminal law policy is needed between penal and non-penal approaches, so that efforts to overcome the crime of receiving money are not only oriented towards revenge, but also include prevention, legal education, and community protection.


Keywords


Approaches; Criminal; Fencing; Law.

References


Journals:

Arief Rahman Kurniadi, “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Penadahan yang Berhubugan dengan Tindak Pidana Pencurian”, artikel: Jurnal Media Justitia Nusantara, Volume 12, Nomor 1, 2022, diakses pada tanggal 2 Mei 2025.

Lino S. Sibarani, 2018, “Peran Kepolisian Dalam Mengungkap Tindak Pidana Penadahan Sepeda Motor”, Tesis (Dipublikasikan), Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara Medan, diakses dari https://download.garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/article.php?article=1433329&val=4136&title=PERAN% 20KEPOLISIAN%20DALAM%20MENGUNGKAP%20TINDAK%20PIDANA%20PENADAH AN%20SEPEDA%20MOTOR%20STUDI%20KASUS%20POLRES%20TOBASA , diakses pada tanggal 2 Mei 2025, pukul 11:49 WIB.

Riyada Layana, “Analisis Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penadahan (Studi Kasus Putusan No.163/Pid.B/2017/PN.Mks)”, terdapat dalam https://digilib.unhas.ac.id/uploaded_files/temporary/DigitalCollection/ODc5N2U5OTMxMzZhOW NhMDA3MzM4OWYxMmNkMDI3MzkzYjExNzcyNA==.pdf pada tanggal 9 September 2022 pukul 23:09 WIB.

Sonia Ivana Komiko Nababan, “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Penadahan Barang Hasil Kejahatan Tindak Pidana Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (ITE) (Studi Putusan Nomor 139/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Bjn)”, artikel: Skripsi (Dipublikasikan), Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara, terdapat pada https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/16313 diakses pada tanggal 2 Mei 2025, pukul 12:33 WIB.

Vebrin Franky Bram Sianipar, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penadahan Yang Dilakukan Bersama-Sama (Studi Putusan Nomor : 1078/Pid.B/2018/PN Mdn), Kumpulan Karya Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Sosial Sains, [S.l.], Volume 1, Nomor 1, Juni 2019, terdapat dalam https://journal.pancabudi.ac.id/index.php/jurnalfasosa/article/view/3089>, diakses pada tanggal 3 Mei 2025, pukul 09:33 WIB.

Books:

Barda Nawawi Arief, 1996, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Barda Nawawi Arief, 2001, Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Coby Mamahit, Tindak Pidana Penadahan dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana di Indonesia, (Manado: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sam Ratulangi, 2017).

Sholehuddin, Sistem Sanksi dalam Hukum Pidana (Ide Dasar Double Track System dan Implementasinya), (Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004).

Regulation:

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia;

Criminal Code (KUHP);

Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law (KUHP);

Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power;

Law No. 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (KUHP).

Supreme Court Decision Number 114/Pid.B/2018/PN Bjb;

Supreme Court Decision Number 655/Pid.B/2017/PN Llg;

Supreme Court Decision Number 17/Pid.B/2020/PN Cjr Jurisprudence;

Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2012 concerning Adjustments to the Limits of Minor Crimes and the Amount of Fines in the Criminal Code.




DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.4.%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: