Restorative Justice on the Settlement of Hate Speech Cases Through Social Media Based on Legal Benefits
Abstract
The crime of hate speech is a crime whose growth in cyberspace is not easy to contain, this is due to the negative behavior of social media users without limits that cannot be contained.The method used in this paper is an empirical approach. Based on the study conducted, it can be seen that implementation of the restorative justice system in hate speech cases in the jurisdiction of the Cimahi City Police has not been implemented effectively, this is indicated by the fact that there has been no resolution of hate speech cases through non-penal channels. Factors that influence the implementation of the restorative justice system in hate speech cases in the jurisdiction of the Cimahi City Police are victims who do not want a restorative justice path, the frequent perpetrators are not committed to the results of the agreement to resolve hate speech cases through restorative justice, and law enforcement who cannot enforce the implementation of legal settlements through restorative justice.
Keywords
References
Journals:
Iman Faturrahman dan Bambang Tri Bawono, Application of Restorative Justice to Solution of Traffic Accidents, Jurnal Daulat Hukum Volume 4 Issue 1, March 2021
M.Gargarin Friyandi dan Aryani Witasari, Restorative Justice In Application For Crime Investigation Abuse In Polsek Middle Semarang, Jurnal Daulat Hukum Volume 2 Issue 1, March 2019
Malik AL-Ghazali, Restorative Justice Approach on The Under Age (Minors) Violator of The Traffic Case Accident (Laka) That Lead to Death in Polres Majalengka, Jurnal Daulat Hukum Volume 1 Issue 3 September 2018
Mohammad Iqbal Ahnaf dan Suhadi, “Isu-isu Kunci Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech): Implikasinya terhadap Gerakan Sosial Membangun Toleransi”, Jurnal Multikultural & Multireligius, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2014
Ragil Tri Wibowo dan Akhmad Khisni, Restorative Justice in Application for Crime Investigation on Property, Jurnal Daulat Hukum Volume 1 No. 2 June 2018
Books:
Fajar, Mukti dan Yulianto Achmad, 2010, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Empiris & Normatif, Pustaka Pelajar, Jakarta
Hamzah, Andi dan A. Sumangelipu, 1983, Pidana Mati di Indonesia, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta
Mertokusumo, Sudikno, 2006, Penemuan Hukum Sebuah Pengantar, Liberty, Yogyakarta
Sarwoto, 1990, Dasar-Dasar Organisasi Dan Manegemen, Ghala Indonesia, Jakarta
Widjaya, Amin Tunggal, 1993, Manajemen Suatu Pengantar Cetakan Pertama, Rineka cipta jaya, Jakarta
Regulation:
Law Number 1 of 1946 concerning the Criminal Code (KUHP).
Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP).
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System.
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia.
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Republic of Indonesia National Police.
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 14 of 1985 concerning the Supreme Court.
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 49 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 2 of 1986 concerning General Courts.
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Interview:
Results of personal interviews withAKP Dimas Charis Suryo Nugroho as Head of Criminal Investigation Unit of Cimahi Police on 12 May 2025
Internet:
Ministry of Communication and Information,In the First Quarter of 2023, Kominfo Identified 425 Hoax Issues, accessed viahttps://www.kominfo.go.id/content/detail/48363/siaran-pers-no-50hmkominfo042023-tentang-triwulan-pertama-2023-kominfo-identifikasi-425-isu-hoaks/0/siaran_pers, on 12 May 2023
Southeast Asia Freedom of Expression Network, Defending digital rights in Southeast Asia:https://id.safenet.or.id/daftarkasus/ accessed 9 April 2025
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.4.%25p
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in:
