Optimization of the Pre-Prosecution Stage as an Effort to Confiscate Assets in Money Laundering Cases (Case Study of Manokwari District Court Decision Number: 28/Pid.B/2023/Pn Mnk)

Diky Priyo Jatmiko

Abstract


Money Laundering is an organized crime that attempts to conceal or eliminate the traces of criminal assets. Money Laundering is significantly regulated by Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering.This study uses a normative juridical method to analyze and explain how the efforts to confiscate assets in money laundering criminal cases are based on applicable laws and regulations; analyze and explain the weaknesses and challenges of confiscating assets in money laundering criminal cases; and analyze and explain the optimization of the Pre-Prosecution stage carried out by the Public Prosecutor in case Number 28 / Pid.B / 2023 / PN Mnk on behalf of the Convict Chandrawati Sutandang, SE The results of the study indicate that the Public Prosecutor in the a quo case has not optimized the pre-prosecution stage as an effort to confiscate assets owned by the defendant from the proceeds of his crime, by paying attention to the lack of supporting evidence that has a direct or indirect relationship to the assets or assets that have been confiscated as evidence, so that in this case it becomes a legal fact in the trial which the panel of judges uses as the Ratio Decidendi in making a decision regarding the return of all evidence belonging to the defendant.


Keywords


Confiscation; Laundering; Money; Prosecution.

References


Journals:

Arifin Zulkarnain, Anatomi Muliawan, “Analisa Yuridis Penerapan TIPIKOR dan TPPU dalam Rangka Optimalisasi Pengembalian Kerugian Negara berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 130/PID.SUS/TPK/2017/PN.JKT.PST.,” JCA of LAW, Vol. 2, No., 1, (2021).

Fuadi. Gumilang, “Tinjauan Perampasan Aset dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dari Perspektif Keadilan”, Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Vol.5, No. 1 (2024), Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.

Khayrunaas Adhyaksa Mulyana, “Analisis Yuridis Tentang Kompetensi Pengadilan Terhadap Perampasan Aset Lintas Teritorial Hasil Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang”, Padjajaran Law Review, Vol. 13, No. 1 (2025).

Books:

Andi Hamzah, 2014, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Dr. Yudi Kristiana, S.H.,M.Hum, 2015, Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Perspektif Hukum Progresif, Yogyakarta: Thafa Media.

M. Yahya Harahap, S.H, 2012, Pembahasan Permasalahan KUHAP Penyidikan dan Penuntutan (Edisi Kedua) , Sinar Grafika: Jakarta

Muhammad Yusuf, "Memperkuat Rezim Anti Pencucian Uang di Indonesia: Menanggulangi Kejahatan Pencucian Uang dan Pembiayaan Terorisme," Makalah disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional Anti Money Laundering, Jakarta, 2020.

Ridwan, 2014, Diskresi & Tanggung Jawab Pemerintah. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press.

Regulation:

Public Prosecutor's Charge File in Case Number 28/Pid.B/2023/PN Mnk.

Legal Directorate of the Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center, 2021, Legal Issues Surrounding Asset Confiscation Under Law Number 8 of 2010 Concerning the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering and Efforts to Optimize It, Jakarta: Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (PPATK).

Manokwari District Court Decision Number 28/Pid.B/2023/PN Mnk

Considerations of the Panel of Judges in Manokwari District Court Decision Number 28/Pid.B/2023/PN Mnk




DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.4.%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: