Effectiveness of Forensic Autopsy As Evidence in Murder Crimes

Anton Isnadi Sulistiawan

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of forensic autopsies as evidence in the criminal justice process for murder, using an empirical study at Bhayangkara Hospital in Semarang City. The study used an empirical juridical approach with descriptive-analytical specifications. Primary data were obtained through in-depth interviews with forensic doctors and police investigators as well as direct observation, while secondary data included relevant laws and regulations and literature. Data analysis was conducted qualitatively. Based on the study, it was concluded that the implementation of forensic autopsies was in accordance with Articles 133 and 134 of the Criminal Procedure Code, starting from the official request of the investigator, notification to the family, to the production of the Visum et Repertum. The effectiveness of forensic autopsies as evidence was considered very high, contributing significantly to revealing the cause of death (as many as 80-85% of cases), determining the mode of crime, and strengthening the judge's conviction. Its success was supported by the competence of forensic doctors, inter-agency coordination, and the quality of documentation. However, this effectiveness was hampered by cultural resistance factors from the victim's family, limited advanced laboratory facilities, and a less than ideal number of forensic human resources. This study recommends increased investment in infrastructure, a massive public education program, and continuous strengthening of forensic medical human resources capacity.



Keywords


Autopsy; Evidence; Forensic; Repertum; Visum.

References


Journals:

Andrisman, Tri. (2019). Efektivitas Visum et Repertum dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 2(3), 345-360. https://doi.org/10.29103/jimfh.v4i3.6384

Arief Budiono. (2019). Peranan Dokter Forensik dalam Penegakan Hukum. Law Development Journal, 1(2), 123-134. https://doi.org/10.6679/snm0b864

Bayu Dwi Kusuma. (2020). Tantangan Kedokteran Forensik dalam Era Digital. Law Development Journal, 2(3), 234-245.

Edi Suharto. (2021). Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Kedokteran Forensik. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 4(2), 278-290.

I Gusti Ayu Radhi Kinandani dan I Wayan Bela Siki Layang. (2021). Tinjauan Kekuatan Pembuktian Visum et Repertum yang Dikeluarkan oleh Dokter Non-Forensik. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 9(10), 1396-1410. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2023.v12.i02.p13.

Linda Widia, et.al. (2024). Fungsi Autopsi Sebagai Alat Bukti oleh Penyidik Dalam Penerapan Unsur Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan. Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review, 3(2), 94-110. https://doi.org/10.31933/exy4s366

Purba, Agnes Nova Astrida, et.al. (2016). Pelaksanaan Kegiatan Promosi Kesehatan Rumah Sakit (PKRS) di Rumah Sakit Bhayangkara Tingkat II Semarang. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 4(5), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.14710/jkm.v4i5.14576

Munandar, Firstady Widyarnan, et.al. (2023). Manajemen instalasi forensik di rumah sakit POLRI sebagai acuan pembentukan instalasi forensik kedokteran gigi di Rumah Sakit Gigi dan Mulut. Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi, 28(3), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkg.v28i3.18669

Samsudi. (2021). Urgensi Autopsi Forensik dan Implikasinya dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan. Veritas et Justitia, 7(2), 328-345. https://repository.unej.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/115340

Setiawan, Agus. (2021). Koordinasi Lintas Sektoral dalam Penanganan Kasus Forensik. Law Development Journal, 3(1), 156-168.

Sri Wahyuni. (2020). Aspek Hukum Pelayanan Kedokteran Forensik di Indonesia. Law Development Journal, 2(4), 312-325.

Sunarto Hartono. (2020). Implementasi Autopsi Forensik dalam Kasus Pembunuhan. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 3(1), 67-78.

Teguh Prasetyo. (2018). Kekuatan Pembuktian Visum et Repertum dalam Hukum Acara Pidana. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 1(4), 189-200.

Widowati, Widya Astuti Tri, dkk. (2021). Peranan Autopsi Forensik dan Korelasinya dengan Kasus Kematian Tidak Wajar. Jurnal Refleksi Hukum, 6(1), 14-29. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2021.v6.i1.p1-18

Books

Atmasasmita, Romli. (2018). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer, Cetakan Kedua. Kencana Prenada Media.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. (2017). Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Cetakan Ketiga. Kencana Prenada Media.

Budiyanto, M. Arif. (2017). Ilmu Kedokteran Forensik, Cetakan Ketiga. Bagian Kedokteran Forensik FKUI.

Chazawi, Adami. (2019). Kejahatan Terhadap Nyawa dan Tubuh Manusia, Cetakan Pertama. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Hamzah, Andi. (2019). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Edisi Revisi. Sinar Grafika.

Harahap, M. Yahya. (2018). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali, Edisi Kedua. Sinar Grafika.

Idries, Abdul Mun'im. (2017). Pedoman Ilmu Kedokteran Forensik, Edisi Pertama. Binarupa Aksara.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. (2021). Penelitian Hukum, Edisi Revisi. Prenada Media.

Rawls, John. (2020). Teori Keadilan, Terjemahan Uzair Fauzan dan Heru Prasetyo, Cetakan Kedua. Pustaka Pelajar.

Soekanto, Soerjono. (2020). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, Cetakan Kedelapan. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Soekanto, Soerjono dan Sri Mamudji. (2019). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Cetakan Keenambelas. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Sunggono, Bambang. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Cetakan Ketujuh. RajaGrafindo Persada.




DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.4.%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: