Effectiveness of the Implementation of Termination of Investigation of Criminal Acts of Abuse Based on Restorative Justice (Case Study of Nabire District Court)
Abstract
In the General Guidelines of State Policy (GBHN) regarding law, it is stated that "legal material must be able to be used as a basis to ensure that society enjoys legal certainty, legal order, and legal protection based on justice and truth, and provides a sense of security and comfort." In compiling a scientific work, data is needed that can be accounted for its truth. This can be done by conducting research in a certain environment or scope in order to obtain accurate and factual data in accordance with the objectives desired by the author. For this reason, in this study the author uses the following research methods: In this study, three main approaches were used, namely the case approach, the concept approach, and the comparative approach, each of which has specific goals and benefits in the analysis. Current Mechanism for Termination of Investigation in Criminal Cases of Assault The mechanism for terminating investigations into criminal assault cases in Indonesia is regulated in Article 109 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, which gives investigators the authority to terminate investigations if insufficient evidence is found, the incident being investigated is not a criminal act, or the investigation is terminated by law.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al Qur’an :
QS. Al- Mā'idah
Journals:
Aronta, E. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pelaku tindak pidana penganiayaan yang dilakukan secara bersama-sama (Studi Putusan PN No. 368/Pid.B/2022/PN Jkt.Pst) [Skripsi, Universitas Lampung].
Baharuddin, M., & Khisni, A. (2020). Effectiveness of pleidooi by the Supreme of criminal murder. Law Development Journal, 2(2), 10.
Mansyur Kartayasa. (2012). Restorative Justice dan prospeknya dalam kebijakan legislasi. [Makalah tidak dipublikasikan].
Wijayanto, S. M. R. N. P. (2015). Restorative Justice: Konsep dan implementasinya dalam sistem peradilan Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 22(3), 312–328.
Books:
Abidin, A. Z. (1984). Hukum pidana bagian umum. Dian Rakyat.
Al-Ghazālī. (n.d.). Al-Mustaṣfā min ‘ilm al-uṣūl. Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Amir Syarifuddin. (2003). Garis-garis besar fiqih Islam. Kencana.
Andi Hamzah. (2005). Pengantar hukum pidana Indonesia. Ghalia Indonesia.
Arief, B. N. (1984). Sari kuliah hukum pidana II. Fakultas Hukum UNDIP.
Arief, B. N. (2008a). Bunga rampai kebijakan hukum pidana: Perkembangan penyusunan konsep KUHP baru. Kencana.
Arief, B. N. (2008b). Masalah penegakan hukum dan kebijakan hukum pidana dalam penanggulangan kejahatan. Kencana.
Bagir Manan. (2007). Teori dan politik konstitusi. UI Press.
Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge University Press.
Kanter, E., & Sianturi, S. R. (2002). Asas-asas hukum pidana di Indonesia dan penerapannya. Storia Grafika.
Kelsen, H. (2009). Teori hukum murni. Prenada Media.
Lamintang, P. A. F., & Lamintang, T. (1997). Dasar-dasar hukum pidana Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Lamintang, T. (2002). Kejahatan terhadap nyawa & tubuh & kesehatan. Sinar Grafika.
Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
Prasetyo, T. (2010). Hukum pidana. Graha Ilmu.
Prodjodikoro, W. (2003). Asas-asas hukum pidana di Indonesia. Refika Aditama.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational behavior (16th ed.). Pearson Education.
Remmelink, J. (2003). Hukum pidana: Komentar atas pasal-pasal terpenting dari KUHP Belanda dan padanannya dalam KUHP Indonesia (T. Moeliono, Trans.). Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Roeslan Saleh. (2002). Pikiran-pikiran tentang pertanggungjawaban pidana. Ghalia Indonesia.
Hutauruk, R. H. (2013). Penanggulangan kejahatan korporasi melalui pendekatan restoratif. Sinar Grafika.
Rusdi Malik. (2002). Penemu agama dalam hukum di Indonesia. Universitas Trisakti.
Soekanto, S. (1981). Pengantar penelitian hukum. UI Press.
Soekanto, S. (1982). Kesadaran hukum dan kepatuhan hukum. Rajawali Pers.
Sudarsono. (2007). Hukum pidana I. Rineka Cipta.
Marshall, T. F. (1999). Restorative Justice: An overview. Home Office Research.
Tushnet, M. (2007). The constitution of the United States: A contextual approach. Oxford University Press.
Regulation:
Republic of Indonesia. (1981). Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law (KUHAP). State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 1981 Number 76.
Republic of Indonesia. (2002). Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 2002 Number 2.
National Police of the Republic of Indonesia. (2008). Regulation of the Chief of Police Number 7 of 2008 concerning Basic Guidelines for Strategy and Implementation of Community Policing.
National Police of the Republic of Indonesia. (2009). Letter of the Chief of Police No. Pol. B/3022/XII/2009/SDEOPS concerning the Concept of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR).
Internet:
Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. (n.d.). Efektif. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id
Daly, K. (2006). The limits of Restorative Justice. In M. Sullivan & L. Tifft (Eds.), Handbook of Restorative Justice. Routledge. http://www.restorativejustice.org
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.2.%25p
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in:
