Rehabilitation as a Form of Restorative Justice for Victims of Class I Narcotics Abuse

Danang Wahyudi, Andri Winjaya Laksana

Abstract


The widespread use and trafficking of illicit drugs can be traced back hundreds of years to the use of psychoactive drugs for religious and recreational purposes and the rise of chemistry and pharmacology in the late 19th century, when societies synthesized a variety of highly potent and highly addictive substances, such as coca and putau. It is difficult for drug addicts to stop using the drugs they use, so drug addicts continue to associate with drug dealers. Based on this view, addiction is a choice of the individual concerned therefore the most appropriate treatment is to rehabilitate the individual concerned. The second view is addicton as a disasse which views addiction as a disease like physical and mental (psychological) diseases. Addicts here are considered victims of their illness and therefore need to be given help in the form of treatment or care to overcome their addiction. To help the author in finding the purpose of this writing, it is necessary to use a research method. Research Methodology is the science of methods that will be used in conducting a study, in this case the author will use the Socio-Research research method. Sociological Research, research that is conducted directly by taking a social approach to society, research by providing questions to sources that are considered relevant and have the capacity to answer questions from researchers and are able to defend the arguments given to researchers. Narcotics are basically substances or drugs that are useful in the field of medicine and scientific development. However, their inappropriate or unsupervised use can cause dependency and have negative impacts on individuals and the wider community. Drug abuse is included in the criminal acts regulated in Law Number 35 of 2009, which distinguishes between addicts and victims of abuse, and encourages perpetrators to undergo rehabilitation as a form of recovery.

Keywords


Conducting; Medicine; Scientific; Trafficking.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Ahamd Hadi. Persamaan Hukum Dengan Pecandu Narkotika Yang Menjalani Proses Hukum”. ProBono & Community Service Journal 1, no 2 (2022): 39-46

Ahmad Fauzi, M. Noor Fajar Al Arif F. “Hak Rehabilitasi Medis Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Sebagai Bentuk Persamaan Hukum Dengan Pecandu Narkotika Yang Menjalani Proses Hukum”. ProBono & Community Service Journal 1, no 2 (2022): 39-46

Deni Nuryadi, Pencarian, Pembebasan dan Pencerahan Jurnal Hukum Progresif Vol:1/Nomor1

Endang Pratiwi, “Teori Utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham: Tujuan Hukum Atau Metode Pengujian Produk Hukum,” Jurnal Konstitusi 19273–27, no. 19 (2022): 273–74.

Frederikus Fios, “Keadilan Hukum Jeremy Bentham Dan Relevansinya Bagi Praktik Hukum Kotemporer,” Humaniora 3, no. 1 (2012): 299–309.

Gilang Fajar Shadiq. “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Narkotika New Psychoactive Subtance Berdasarkan Undang Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika”. Wawasan Yuridika 1, no 1 (2017) 35-53

Intan Permata sari, I Gusti Bagus Surwayan, I Nyoman Sudjana. “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pecandu Narkotika”. Jurnal Analogi Hukum 1, no 1 (2019): 104-109

Karmana, S., Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Suryani, L. P, 2023, Implementasi Restorative Justice Bagi Pelaku Penyalahguna Narkotika di Direktorat Reserse Narkoba Polda Bali. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 4(1), 68-73

KuatPuji Prayitno, “Restorative Justice Untuk Peradilan di Indonesia (Perspektif Yuridis Filosofis dalam Penegakan Hukum In Concreto),” Jurnal dinamika hukum, 12.3 (2012), 407–20

Latipulhayat, “Khazanah Jeremy Bentham,” Padjajaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 2 (2015): 413.

Rayani Saragih, Maria Ferba Editnya Simanjuntak. “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Di Indonesia”. Journal Of Education Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) 4, no 1 (2021):98-105

Zainab Ompu Jainah. 2015. Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Perantara Jual Beli Narkotika Golongan I (Studi Perkara Nomor 1066/PID/B/2012/PN.TK). Jurnal Keadilan Progresif Vol. 6 No. 1.

Books:

Ahmad Muliadi, Makalah Politik Hukum, (Jakarta: SAP S-2 Universitas Jayabaya, 2012)

Amiruddin dan H. Zainal Asikin, 2012, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Cetakan Keenam, PT. Rajagrafindo Persada, Jakarta, hlm.48

Darji dalam Hyronimus Rhiti Darmodihardjo, Filsafat Hukum: Edisi Lengkap (Dari Klasik Sampai Postmoderenisme) (Yogjakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2011).

I Made Pasek Diantha, 2016, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

Jeremy Bentham., An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (Batoche Books, 2000).

Liebmann, Marian, 2007, Restorative Justice How It Works, Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London and Philadelphia.

Lilik Rasyidi (dalam Zainuddin Ali), Filsafat Hukum (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010).

Lily Rasjid, Filsafat Hukum, Apakah Hukum Itu? (Bandung: Remadja Karya CV, 1984).

Lushiana Primasari, “Keadilan Restoratif dan Pemenuhan Hak Asasi Bagi Anak yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum,” Jurnal Universitas Sebelas Maret.

M Echols John dan Shadily Hassan, Kamus Inggris Indonesia, An English Indonesian Dictionary, Jakarta, Gramedia (Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2005).

M. Arief Hakim, Bahaya Narkoba Alkohol: Cara Islam Mencegah, Mengatasi, dan Melawan, (Bandung:Nuansa, 2004)

Mirza Sahputra, “Restorative Justice Sebagai Wujud Hukum Progresif dalam Peraturan Perudang-Undangan di Indonesia,” Jurnal Transformasi Administrasi, 12.01 (2022), 87–96

Nuryanti Mustari, Pemahaman Kebijakan Publik Formulasi, Implementasi & Evaluasi Kebijakan (Yogyakarta: Leutikaprio, 2015).

Rado, R. H., Alputila, M. J., & Badilla, N. W. Y, 2022, Buku Ajar Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (PIH). Penerbit NEM, hlm, 35.

R. Tony Prayogo, “Penerapan Asas Kepastian Hukum Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 Tentang Hak Uji Materiil Dan Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 06/Pmk/2005 Tentang Pedoman Beracara Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang “, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Volume 13, Nomor 2, 2016

Satjipto Rahardjo, Membedah Hukum Progresif, (Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2006)

Satjipto Rahardjo, Penegakan Hukum Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis, (Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2009)

Sarasati, A., Afif, M., & Gunawan, R, 2013, Mengurai Undang-Undang Narkotika. Jakarta: Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Masyarkat.

Soedjono Dirjosisworo, Hukum Narkotika di Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti. 1990

Soekedy, Menyiram Bara Narkoba. Jakarta: Millenium. 2002

Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, 1985. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, CV. Rajawali, Jakarta.

Sudikno Mertokusumo, Bab-Bab Tentang Penemuan Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti: Bandung, 1993

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, CV.

Wolfgang Friedmann, Legal Theory (London: Steven & Sons, 1949)

Yvon Dandurand dan Curt Taylor Griffiths, Handbook on Restorative Justice Programmes (New York: United Nations, 2006)

Regulation:

Constitution

Criminal Code

Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics Regulation of the Minister of Health Number 30 of 2023 concerning the Classification of Narcotics

PERMA No. 1 of 2014 concerning Handling of Narcotics Addicts and Victims of Narcotics Abuse in Rehabilitation Institutions

Internet:

Willa Wahyun, 2022, “Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Rehabilitasi Narkotika”, https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/efektivitas-pelaksanaan-rehabilitasi-narkotika-lt630f3d4ef3cf8 accessed on 15 March 2025 at 10.50.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.2.%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: