The Urgency of Implementing Restorative Justice as the Absolute Authority of the Indonesian Attorney General's Office in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia

Arlin Aditya Meidiana Putra, Achmad Sulchan

Abstract


In the development of criminal law, the term restorative justice is known. This development is because the restributive system that has been applied so far has not been able to fully fulfill the sense of justice for the community. Criminal law according to retributive justice is an orientation of justice aimed at violators and solely because of violations of the law, violations of criminal law are violations of state rights so that the victim of the crime is the state, so that the concept of retributive justice does not provide a place for protection for victims. Given that victims of criminal acts can not only experience material losses but are very likely to experience immaterial losses. The definition of restorative justice is an effort to provide a restoration of relationships and redemption of mistakes that the perpetrator of the crime (his family) wants to do to the victim of the crime (his family) (peace efforts) outside the court with the intention and purpose that legal problems arising from the occurrence of the criminal act can be resolved properly by reaching an agreement and agreement between the parties. This research is a type of Normative Research, with the specifications of Descriptive Analytical Research, using research methods obtained by researchers indirectly through intermediary media and using library techniques, in analyzing the formulation of the problem using the Law Enforcement Theory, Authority Theory and Progressive Legal Theory. Restorative Justice is currently not only the concern of the Attorney General's Office, but also several agencies in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia, such as the Supreme Court and the Indonesian National Police.


Keywords


Criminal; Justice; Restorative; System.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Hanafi Arief, dkk, “Penerapan Prinsip Restorative Justice dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia”, Jurnal Al’Adl, Volume X Nomor 2, Juli 2018, hlm. 1

Ferry Irawan Febriansyah, Keadilan berdasarkan Pancasila sebagai dasar Filosofis dan Ideologis Bangsa, DiH Jurnal Hukum, Vol.13. No25, Februari 2017, hlm 6

Tiar Adi Riyanto, “Fungsionalisasi Prinsip Dominus Litis Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia,” Jurnal Lex Renaissance 6, no. 3 (2021): 481–92, https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol6.iss3.art4. Diakses 22 Mei 2025

Gede Putera Perbawa, “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Eksistensi Asas Dominis Litis,” Arena Hukum 7, no. 1 (2014): 303–471. Diakses 22 Mei 2025

Umar Al-Tamimi, ‘Lembaga Pemaafan Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Perspektif Hukum Islam’, Jurnal Diskursus Islam, 1.3 (2013), h.455

Avif Alfiyah, ‘Metode Penafsiran Buya Hamka Dalam Tafsir Al- Azhar’, Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin, 15.1 (2017),h 25–35

Books:

Barda Nawawi Arief, Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2002, hal. 109

Budi Sastra Panjaitan, Victimologi Pandangan Advokat Terhadap Perbuatan Pidana Dan Korban, (Banyumas: CV Amerta Media, 2022), h. 118

Burhanuddin,ST, “Mengubah Paradigma Keadilan, Langkah Restorative Justice Kejaksaan”, Marija, Jakarta, 2022, hlm.32.

DS. Dewi, dan Fatahillah A. Syukur, Mediasi Penal: Penerapan Restorative Justice di Pengadilan Anak Indonesiat, hlm. 71.

Eldin H. Zainal, Hukum Pidana Islam Sebuah Perbandingan, (Bandung:

G. Widiartana dan Aloysius Wisnubroto, “Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Pidana”, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2005, hlm. 42

H. Siswanto Sunarso, “Viktimologi dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana”, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2014, hlm. 157.

Kadri Husen dan Budi Rizki Husin.2016. Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jakarta: PercetakanSinar Grafika. hlm, 9

Kansil. 2003. Pengantar Hukum Indonesia (jilid II). Jakarta : PT Balai Pustaka Persero,hlm. 377.

Lamintang. 2014. Dasar- Dasar Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Jakarta : Sinar Grafika,hlm. 180

M. Arief Amrullah, Perkembangan Kejahatan Korporasi: Dampak dan Permasalahan Penegakan Hukum, (Jakarta, Prenamedia Grup, 2018).

M. Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP: Penyidikan Dan Penuntutan, Jakarta: Sinar grafika, 2009, hal. 90.

M.Agus Santoso, Hukum, Moral & Keadilan Sebuah Kajian Filsafat, Jakarta: Kencana, Hlm85

Made Wahyu Chandra Satriana dan Ni Made Liana Dewi, Sistem Peradilan Pidana Perspektif Restoratif Justice, (Denpasar, Universitas Udayana Press, 2021)

Mardjono Reksodipuro, Kriminologi dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kumpulan Karangan Buku Kedua, Jakarta: Pusat Pelayanan Keadilan dan Pengabdian Hukum Lembaga Kriminologi Universitas Indonesia, 1997

Regulation:

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Criminal Code.

Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law

Law Number 11 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 2021 Number 298, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6755)

Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2024 concerning Guidelines for Trying Criminal Cases Based on Restorative Justice.

Regulation of the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia Number 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice.

Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia National Police Number 8 of 2021 concerning Handling of Criminal Acts Based on Restorative Justice.

Internet:

Blostunian. Sistem Hukum Yang Dianut Di Indonesia. 2015. https://blostunian24.wordpress.com/2015/06/22/sistem-hukum- yang-dianut-di-indonesia/, accessed on 27/8/2023

Reda Manthovani, “Penerapan Asas Dominis Litis Dalam UU KPK,”hukumonline.com,2019,https://www.hukumonline.com/b erita/a/penerapan-asas-dominis-litis-dalam-uu kpklt5ddf8ba3bb064/?page=1. Accessed on 23 May 2025




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.2.%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: