Implementation of Termination of Prosecution in the Criminal Action of Motor Vehicle Embasement Based on Restorative Justice
Abstract
Abstract. Fraud or embezzlement is one form of crime that is grouped into crimes against people's property. Provisions regarding this crime are generally regulated in Article 378 to Article 395 of Book II Chapter XXV of the Criminal Code. The purpose of this study is to determine and analyze the Implementation of Termination of Prosecution in the crime of Motor Vehicle Embezzlement based on restorative justice at this time; to determine and analyze the obstacles in the implementation of Termination of Prosecution in the crime of Motor Vehicle Embezzlement based on restorative justice at this time; and to determine and analyze the Implementation of Termination of Prosecution in the crime of Motor Vehicle Embezzlement based on restorative justice in the future. The type of research conducted in this study is a normative legal approach. The implementation of the termination of prosecution in the crime of motor vehicle embezzlement based on restorative justice at the Klaten District Attorney's Office has been implemented in accordance with the Republic of Indonesia Attorney General's Regulation Number 15 of 2020. The termination of prosecution is carried out responsibly by considering the consent of the victim and the perpetrator and the fulfillment of subjective and objective requirements, such as the suspect is committing a crime for the first time, the criminal threat is not more than five years, there is a peace agreement, the restoration of the original condition by the suspect, and community support. However, this implementation faces major obstacles, namely the time limitation of 14 days in the statutory regulations which is considered not comparable to the process of terminating prosecution and cultural factors in the form of low awareness of victims to forgive the perpetrator.
Keywords: Embezzlement; Justice; Prosecution; Restorative.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Andi Muhammad Sofyan, Hukum Acara Pidana (Jakarta: Kencana, 2020).
Andri Kristanto, “Kajian Peraturan Jaksa Agung Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 Tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif,” Jurnal Lex Renaissance 7, no. 1 (2022): 180–93, https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol7.iss1.art14.
Cholida Hanum, “Prospek Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia,” Veritas 7, no. 1 (2023): 1–18, https://doi.org/10.34005/veritas.v7i1.1231.
Guntur Setiawan, Impelemtasi dalam Birokrasi Pembangunan (Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 2014).
Kadri Husin, Buku Ajar Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Bandar Lampung: Bagian Hukum Pidana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung, 2016).
Leden Marpaung, Asas dan Teori Praktek Hukum Pidana (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2008).
Leden Marpaung, Asas dan Teori Praktek Hukum Pidana (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2008).
Lutfi Efendi, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Administrasi Negara (Malang: Bayumedia, 2004).
M. Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Penyidikan dan Penuntutan (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010).
Marlina, Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia, Pengembangan Konsep Diversi dan Restorative Justice (Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2009).
Marwan Effendy, Kejaksaan RI : Posisi dan Fungsinya dari Perspektif Hukum (Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2005).
Mukti Fajar dan Yulianto Achmad, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Nortmatif dan Empiris (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2009).
O.C. Kaligis, Perlindungan Hukum atas Hak Asasi Tersangka, Terdakwa dan Terpidana (Bandung: Alumni, 2006).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.1.390-402
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in:
