Prosecutor's Authority in Terminating Prosecution of Juvenile Criminal Cases Based on Restorative Justice

Hafidz Listyo Kusumo, Gunarto Gunarto

Abstract


Abstract. The Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia as a government institution that exercises state power in the field of prosecution must be able to realize legal certainty, legal order, and justice. Likewise in criminal cases committed by children, this concept is used as one of the efforts that will realize justice, certainty and legal benefits because by terminating prosecution through Diversion as a form of the concept of restorative justice. This study aims to determine, examine, analyze the authority of prosecutors, mechanisms, and authorities in the future in terminating prosecution of child criminal cases based on restorative justice. The approach method used in this study is Normative juridical. The specifications of this study are descriptive analytical. The data sources used are secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and testier legal materials. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the authority of the prosecutor in terminating the prosecution of child criminal cases based on restorative justice is guided by the Attorney General's Regulation Number 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice and also by considering Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. The mechanism for terminating prosecution in child criminal cases based on restorative justice is to seek a settlement process with diversion as a path to follow from the concept of restorative justice. The concept of the prosecutor's authority policy in terminating prosecution in child criminal cases based on restorative justice in the futureit should be emphasized by regulating complex authority in Legislation which has a higher position than the position of the Regulation issued internally by the relevant Institution, in this case the Attorney General's Regulation regarding the termination of prosecution based on restorative justice.

Keywords: Authority; Crime; Justice; Prosecutor; Termination.


Keywords


Keywords: Authority; Crime; Justice; Prosecutor; Termination.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Books:

Chazawi, Adami. 2005. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana I (sistem pidana, tindak pidana, teori-teori pemidanaan & batas berlakunya hukum pidana). Jakarta: PT Raja Grafika Persada.

Hidayat, Bunadi. 2010. Pemidananan Anak Dibawah Umur. Bandung: PT Alumni.

Hidjaz, Kamal. 2010. Efektivitas Penyelenggaraan Kewenangan Dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Daerah Di Indonesia. Makassar: Pustaka Refleksi.

Ibrahim, Johny . 2007. Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normative .Malang: Bayu Media Publishing.

J.G. Brouwer dan Schilder. 1998. A Survey of Dutch Administrative law. dikutip dalam: Rusadi Kantaprawira.

Nurhayati, Yati . 2020. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum . Bandung: Penerbit Nusa Media.

Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. 2003. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia . Jakarta: Refika Aditama.

Soekanto, Soerjono. 1984. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.

Waluyo, Bambang . 2008. Pidana dan Pemidanaan . Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Legislation:

Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (KUHP).

Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System.

Law Number 11 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia.

Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP).

Regulation of the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia Number 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice.

Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2014 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversion in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System.

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

Journals:

Budiyono, Setya Wahyudi, Dwi Hapsari Retnaningrum, Kompabilitas Restorative Justice dengan Nilai-Nilai Pancasila dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan, Vol 4 No 1, April 2024.

Dessy Kusuma Dewi, Kewenangan Jaksa Dalam Menghentikan Penuntutan Demi Keadilan, Diktum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol 9, No.1, May 2021.

Eko Syaputra, Penerapan Konsep Restorative Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Masa Yang Akan Datang, lex lata Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sriwijaya, Vol. 3, No.2, July 2021.

Gita Santika, Pearn Kejaksaan Mewujudkan Keadilan Restoratif Sebagai Upaya Penangggulangan Kejahatan, Progresif: Jurnal Hukum Vol xvi No 1, Juny 2021.

I Made Dwi Narendra, dkk, ʺPeranan Intelejen Kejaksaan Dalam Pengungkapan Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Kasus Kejaksaan Negeri Buleleng) ʺ, Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, Vol. 3, No.1 March 2022.

Ismail Iskandar, Faisal Abdullah, Ulil Amri, Besse Astuti, Sistem Pemidanaan Anak yang Berkonflik dengan Hukum: Ditinjau dari Tujuan Pemidanaan, Papua law journal, Vol 8 No 2, 2024.

M. Yuhdi, “Tugas dan Wewenang Kejaksaan Dalam Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Umum”, Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasiala dan Kewarganegaraan, Volume 7, Nomor 2, 2014, p. 96

Nadia Teresia Simanjutak dan Herlina Manullang, Tantangan Yang Dihadapi Jaksa Dalam Melakukan Penuntutan Perkara Anak, Jurnal Hukum Republica Fakultas Hukum Universitas lancing Kuning, December 2024.

Internet

https://rumahrjkejaksaan.luwuutarakab.go.id/tentang, accessed on 29 December 2024 at 12. 47 Wib.

Wikipedia, https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kejaksaan_Republik_Indonesia, accessed on 2 January 2025 at 12.23 Wib.

Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia, https://kejaksaan.go.id/about/info , accessed on 2 January 2025 at 12.38 Wib.

https://kejari-kendal.kejaksaan.go.id/index.php/2023/03/30/keberhasilan-kejaksaan-negeri-kendal-dalam-pelaksanaan-diversi-perkara-tindak-pidana-yang-dilakukan-oleh-anak/,




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.1.353-367

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: