Minimum Criminal Prosecution Specifically in Cases of Corruption by the Prosecutor's Office
Abstract
Abstract. This research aims to aims to find out and analyze the implementation of special minimum criminal prosecution in corruption cases by the Prosecutor's Office, to find out and analyze the obstacles and solutions to the implementation of special minimum criminal prosecution in corruption cases by the Prosecutor's Office. Based on the study, it was concluded that the special minimum criminal prosecution in corruption cases at the Hulu Sungai Selatan District Attorney's Office was carried out based on the Attorney General's Guidelines Number 1 of 2019, with the condition that the suspect/defendant returns 100% of the state's financial losses. However, the obstacle faced is that many defendants are unable to return the losses, so that special minimum criminal prosecution cannot be carried out. Although the return of losses allows for minimal criminal charges, the case title procedure at the High Prosecutor's Office is still required in some cases. However, with the change in policy through the latest Circular, a case title at the High Prosecutor's Office is no longer required, so that special minimum criminal prosecution can be implemented without any obstacles.
Keywords: Corruption; Crime; Prosecution.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Books:
Evi Hartanti, 2000, Criminal Acts of Corruption, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Evi Hartanti, 2016, Criminal Acts of Corruption, Second Edition, Sixth Printing, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Sudhono Iswahyudi, 2003, Paper by the Deputy Attorney General for Special Crimes, The Relationship between the Corruption Eradication Commission and the Prosecutor's Office in Handling Corruption Crimes.
Journals:
Ahmad Hadi Prayitno, Policy on Formulating Special Minimum Criminal Threats as an Effort to Combat Corruption in the Future, article: Meta-Yuridis Journal Vol. 2 No.1 Year 2019, accessed on January 9, 2025.
Arianus Harefa, Problems of Enforcing the Death Penalty in Corruption Crimes from the Perspective of Human Rights Protection, Jurnal Panah Keadilan, Vol. 1, Number 2, August 2022.
Denny Latumaerissa, APPLICATION OF SPECIAL MINIMUM CRIMINAL SANCTIONS FOR NARCOTIC CRIMES (Study of Decision Number 111/Pid.Sus/2017/PN Sag), article: Jurnal Belo Volume V No. 1 August 2019-January 2020, accessed on January 9, 2025.
M. Sholehuddin, Special Minimum Criminal Sanctions in the Theory and Practice of Legislation, Judiciary Journal Volume 5 Edition 1 January 2013.
Legislation:
Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Criminal Acts of Corruption.
Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code.
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Internet:
https://soloraya.solopos.com/kasus-korupsi-tik-pegawai-disdikbud-karanganyar-dituntut-15-tahun-penjara-1745474, accessed on Monday, December 8, 2024, at 20.50. WIB,
https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/research/20240319061435-128-523069/daftar-korupsi-ditangani-kejagung-kerugian-negara-puluhan-triliun, accessed on Monday, December 8, 2024, at 20.30 WIB.
https://www.suara.com/bisnis/2020/09/24/130637/tersangka-kasus-jiwasraya-dituntut-penjara-seumur-hidup-netizen-bereaksi#goog_rewarded, accessed on Monday, December 8, 2024, at 20.45. WIB,
https://www.tempo.co/hukum/5-kasus-korupsi-kelas-kakap-yang-pernah-ditangani-kejaksaan-agung-55810, accessed on Monday, December 8, 2024, at 20.00 WIB.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.1.83-94
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in:

