Metabolism-independent phenomenon in ethanolic propolis inhibitory capacity towards enterococcus spp proteolytic activity

Arya Adiningrat, Rizqi Alifna Waskita Prabowo, Ridho Kurnia, Nurul Fitri Fika Septianti, Ikhsan Maulana, Erma Sofiani

Abstract


Background: Root canal bacteria produce many virulence factors which are responsible for endodontic pathological states. Bacteria are assumed to utilize energy from bacterial cell metabolism activity for producing these virulence factors. Propolis extracts are commonly reported to have antibacterial abilities against dental pathogens. The purpose of this study is to investigate the possible correlation between bacterial proteolytic and metabolism activities under the treatment of ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP).
Method: The 0.00125%; 0.05%; 0.1%; 0.2%; 0.4%; and 0.8% ethanolic propolis were prepared for recovery rate confirmative procedure, proteolytic, and metabolism activity assay, with 2% of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) was used as a positive control. The bacteria were cultured in brain heart infusion (BHI) media after EEP treatment. Bacterial suspension was initially prepared in broth culture dilution with BHI media, followed by the gelatin liquefaction measurement for proteolytic assay. Phenol-red and arginine dehydrogenase enriched media for observing both carbohydrate and arginine metabolism activities, respectively, in the clinical Enterococcus spp. and E. faecalis ATCC 29212.
Result: The recovery rate of the bacteria was not terminated after several EEP treatments. Proteolytic activity of the bacteria was likely decreased in several EEP treatments. EEP tended to affect the carbohydrate and arginine metabolism of the bacteria in certain fashions.
Conclusion: This study suggested that the EEP treatment affected both proteolytic and metabolism activity in negative regulation tendencies.


Keywords


Energy metabolism; Enterococcus spp; ethanolic extract of propolis; proteolytic activity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Tabassum S, Khan FR. Failure of endodontic treatment: The usual suspects. Eur J Dent 2016; 10: 144–147.

SipaviÄiÅ«tÄ— E, ManelienÄ— R. Pain and flare-up after endodontic treatment procedures. Stomatologija 2014; 16: 25–30.

Alghamdi F, Shakir M. The Influence of Enterococcus faecalis as a Dental Root Canal Pathogen on Endodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2020; 12: e7257.

Jangnga ID, Kambaya PP, Kosala K. Uji Aktivitas Antibakteri dan Analisis Bioautografi Kromatografi Lapis Tipis Ekstrak Etanol Daun Srikaya (Annona squamosa L) terhadap Enterococcus faecalis secara In Vitro. ODONTO Dent J 2018; 5: 102.

Stuart C, Schwartz S, Beeson T, et al. Enterococcus faecalis: Its Role in Root Canal Treatment Failure and Current Concepts in Retreatment. J Endod 2006; 32: 93–98.

Love RM, Jenkinson HF. Invasion of dentinal tubules by oral bacteria. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med Off Publ Am Assoc Oral Biol 2002; 13: 171–183.

Yin W, Wang Y, Liu L, et al. Biofilms: The Microbial ‘Protective Clothing’ in Extreme Environments. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20: E3423.

Gijo J, K PK, S SG, et al. Enterococcus faecalis, a nightmare to endodontist: A systematic review. Afr J Microbiol Res 2015; 9: 898–908.

Waters CM, Antiporta MH, Murray BE, et al. Role of the Enterococcus faecalis GelE protease in determination of cellular chain length, supernatant pheromone levels, and degradation of fibrin and misfolded surface proteins. J Bacteriol 2003; 185: 3613–3623.

Guneser MB, Eldeniz AU. The effect of gelatinase production of Enterococcus faecalis on adhesion to dentin after irrigation with various endodontic irrigants. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand 2016; 2: 144–149.

Tendolkar PM, Baghdayan AS, Shankar N. Pathogenic enterococci: new developments in the 21st century. Cell Mol Life Sci CMLS 2003; 60: 2622–2636.

Ramsey M, Hartke A, Huycke M. The Physiology and Metabolism of Enterococci. In: Gilmore MS, Clewell DB, Ike Y, et al. (eds) Enterococci: From Commensals to Leading Causes of Drug Resistant Infection. Boston: Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK190432/ (2014, accessed 8 January 2022).

Richards CL, Raffel SJ, Bontemps-Gallo S, et al. The arginine deaminase system plays distinct roles in Borrelia burgdorferi and Borrelia hermsii. PLOS Pathog 2022; 18: e1010370.

Xiong L, Teng JLL, Botelho MG, et al. Arginine Metabolism in Bacterial Pathogenesis and Cancer Therapy. Int J Mol Sci 2016; 17: 363.

Barcelona-Andrés B, Marina A, Rubio V. Gene structure, organization, expression, and potential regulatory mechanisms of arginine catabolism in Enterococcus faecalis. J Bacteriol 2002; 184: 6289–6300.

Huang S, Zhang C-P, Wang K, et al. Recent advances in the chemical composition of propolis. Mol Basel Switz 2014; 19: 19610–19632.

Silva JC, Rodrigues S, Feás X, et al. Antimicrobial activity, phenolic profile and role in the inflammation of propolis. Food Chem Toxicol 2012; 50: 1790–1795.

Adiningrat A, Kusnadi RA, Allam AS, et al. The Effect of Probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus and Ethanolic Propolis Compound toward Nucleic Acid Deposition in the Extracellular Polymeric Substance of Root Canal Bacteria. Eur J Dent 2022; s-0042-1750771.

Fauzi AF, Indiana SK, Wicaksono RH, et al. A Challenge in Ethanolic Propolis Utilization from Apis Trigona as an Oral Antimicrobial Agent. J Int Dent Med Res 2018; 11: 682–686.

Masyita A, Mustika Sari R, Dwi Astuti A, et al. Terpenes and terpenoids as main bioactive compounds of essential oils, their roles in human health and potential application as natural food preservatives. Food Chem X 2022; 13: 100217.

Tagousop CN, Tamokou J-D, Ekom SE, et al. Antimicrobial activities of flavonoid glycosides from Graptophyllum grandulosum and their mechanism of antibacterial action. BMC Complement Altern Med 2018; 18: 252.

Pambudi AR, Wasiaturrahmah Y, Aspriyanto D. Antibacterial Effectiveness Of Kecapi Sentul Extract (Sandoricum koetjape Merr.) against Streptococcus mutans. ODONTO Dent J 2021; 8: 1.

Setiawan AS, Fatriadi F, Prisinda D. AKTIVITAS ANTIBAKTERI FRAKSI ETANOL DAUN KEMANGI (Ocimum americanum) TERHADAP Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212. ODONTO Dent J 2020; 7: 111.

Kumar S, Pandey AK. Chemistry and Biological Activities of Flavonoids: An Overview. Sci World J 2013; 2013: 1–16.

Martinez-Gonzalez AI, Díaz-Sánchez ÃG, Rosa LA de la, et al. Polyphenolic Compounds and Digestive Enzymes: In Vitro Non-Covalent Interactions. Mol Basel Switz 2017; 22: E669.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/odj.9.2.206-214

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Lisensi Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
Contact us: Odonto Dental Journal: Jl. Raya Kaligawe Km.4, PO BOX 1054/SM Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112. Email: odontodentaljournal@unissula.ac.id