The Application of Cooperative Team Games Tournament (TGT) Method for Improving Quadratic Equation Learning Outcomes in Vocational High Schools

Authors

  • Sri Wati SMKS Muhammadiyah 4 Sukorejo
  • Mohamad Aminudin Sultan Agung Islamic University image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30659/kontinu.8.1.81-87

Abstract

Abstarct. This study aims to improve the learning outcomes of vocational high school (SMK) students in quadratic equation material through the implementation of the Teams Games Tournament (TGT) learning model. The research method employed was Classroom Action Research (CAR), conducted in three cycles, each consisting of planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. The subjects of this study were 10th-grade students at SMKS Muhammadiyah 4 Sukorejo Kendal. Data were collected through learning outcome tests and classroom activity observations. The findings indicate that the TGT model effectively enhances students' understanding of quadratic equations, as evidenced by the increase in average test scores and active participation in group discussions and academic competitions. This research supports the use of game-based cooperative learning to boost student motivation and academic achievement in vocational education.

Keywords: Teams Games Tournament (TGT), learning outcomes, quadratic equations, classroom action research, vocational high school.

References

Febriana, R., Yusmin, E., & Suratman, D. (2022). The effect of Teams Games Tournament (TGT) on students’ mathematical problem-solving ability. Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.1.9876

Hendriana, H., Rohaeti, E. E., & Sumarmo, U. (2017). Hard skills dan soft skills matematik siswa. Refika Aditama.

Isjoni. (2013). Cooperative learning: Efektivitas pembelajaran kelompok. Alfabeta.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2018). Cooperative learning: The foundation for active learning. In Active learning—Beyond the future. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81086

Kurniawan, H., Putri, R. I. I., & Hartono, Y. (2021). Teacher-centered vs. student-centered learning in mathematics: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 417-434. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14224a

Slavin, R. E. (2013). Cooperative learning and academic achievement: Why does groupwork work? Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 785-791. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.201201

Arikunto, S., et al. (2020). Penelitian tindakan kelas: Edisi revisi. Bumi Aksara.

Brookhart, S. M. (2014). How to design questions and tasks to assess student thinking. ASCD.

Cohen, L., et al. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

Devi, P. S., et al. (2021). Teams Games Tournament in mathematics learning: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 101-118. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1437a

Hattie, J. (2017). Visible learning for teachers. Routledge.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2014). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing. Pearson.

Capar, G., & Tarim, K. (2015). Efficacy of the cooperative learning method. Journal of Educational Research, 108(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.866147

Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom. Computers & Education, 80, 152-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019

Mertler, C. A. (2022). Action research: Improving schools and empowering educators. SAGE.

Wijaya, T. T., et al. (2023). Vocational mathematics learning. Journal of Technical Education, 15(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.21078/jte.2023.1.45

Zhao, F., et al. (2022). Gamified assessment in education. Educational Technology Research, 70(3), 1021-1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10112-0

Downloads

Published

2024-05-02

Issue

Section

Articles