Design Thinking in Minimum Competency Assessment: Its Effect on Vocational Students’ Numeracy Skills
Abstract
Abstract. The 21st century requires individuals to have the ability to think comprehensively, especially in critical and creative thinking. However, there is a significant gap between global competency demands and student competency achievement in Indonesia. The results of the PISA study show that the literacy skills of Indonesian students are still relatively low, including in terms of numeracy or contextual problem solving. Based on a preliminary study of 658 vocational school students in Semarang, as many as 81.9% considered mathematics as a difficult subject. This research uses a qualitative approach with the Design Thinking method and ADDIE R&D model development design. The stages of Design Thinking applied include: the empathize stage to explore students' learning needs through interviews and observations; the definition stage to identify the main problems in learning; the ideate stage to design an AKM-based learning solution; prototype stage to create interactive media and LKPD; as well as the test stage to implement the media and assess its effectiveness through the Minimum Competency Assessment (AKM). Numeracy ability is studied through three main indicators, namely (1) the use of numerical and symbolic representations, (2) information analysis in the form of tables, graphs, images, and diagrams, and (3) the formulation of conclusions or predictions from available data. Data is collected through tests and analyzed descriptively as well as statistical tests. The results of the analysis showed that of 36 students in grade XI of SMK Negeri 1 Semarang, 86% had numeracy skills in the very high category and 14% in the high category, obtained a significance value (Sig.) for class XI TO 2 of 0.109 and for class XI TO 3 of 0.134. Both values are greater than 0.05, so it can be concluded that the data from both classes come from a normally distributed population. The average post-test score of the experimental class was 85.39 higher than the control class of 84.16. This indicates that the work on AKM questions and the use of media based on the Design Thinking approach contribute statistically significantly to improving students' numeracy skills. Thus, AKM has proven to be effective as a measuring tool as well as a strategy to increase numeracy in mathematics learning at vocational schools.
Keywords: Minimum Competency Assessment, Numeracy Ability of Vocational School Students, Design Thinking Approach in Mathematics.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amelia, A., & Suryadi, D. (2022). Penerapan Pendekatan Design Thinking Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 16(2), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpm.v16i2.22456
Anggraini, K. E., & Setianingsih, R. (2022). Analisis kemampuan numerasi siswa sma dalam menyelesaikan soal asesmen kompetensi minimum (AKM). MATHEdunesa, 11(3), 837-849.
Ardianingtyas, I. R., Sunandar, S., & Dwijayanti, I. (2020). Kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMP ditinjau dari kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika. Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 2(5), 401–408. https://doi.org/10.26877/imajiner.v2i5.6661
Arikunto, S. (2012). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan (Edisi Revisi). Bumi Aksara.
Ayu, A., Nursyahidah, F., & Prayito, M. (2024). Development of Learning Media Using Ethnomathematics-Based Augmented Reality on Cube and Block Material. Phenomenon : Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 13(2), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.21580/phen.2023.13.2.17130
Ayuni, S., Pasaribu, F. T., & Kumalasari, A. (2024). Desain Media Pembelajaran Berbasis STEM Design Thinking Berbantuan Video Animasi Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika RAFA, 10(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.19109/jpmrafa.v10i1.17852
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.
Bratsberg, H. M. (2019). Empathy maps of the Four Sight preferences. International Center for Studies in Creativity.
Dwijayanti, I. (2014). Efektivitas kelas humanistik dalam pembelajaran matematika terhadap karakteristik peserta didik. Aksioma, 5(1), 67–78.
Dwijayanti, I., Utami, R. E., & Nugroho, A. A. (2021). Peningkatan kemampuan TPACK calon guru: Analisis kemungkinan kesalahan pemahaman konsep aljabar serta strategi pencegahannya. Aksioma: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(4), 2283. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i4.4119
Siska Firmasari, Setiyani, Jajo Firman Raharjo, Mohammad Dadan Sundawan, & Rismayani. (2024). Design of an Electronic Test for Geometry Material Based on Students’ Numeracy Literacy and Metacognitive Knowledge. Journal of Education Technology, 7(4), 724–733. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v7i4.63608
Fitriani, L., & Pratiwi, R. N. (2021). Penerapan model Design Thinking dalam pembelajaran matematika berbasis masalah. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 8(1), 45–53.
Gumulya, D., & Suhanto, Y. (2024). Applying gamification principles through the design thinking framework for developing a mixed reality educational game in numeracy learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00442-9
Han, H., Rosli, R., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2017). Assessing numeracy skills of students: A review of literature. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(2), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/588
Han, S., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2017). How science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) project-based learning affects high-need students in the U.S. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.045
Handayani, L. ., & Zen, E. F. . (2024). Penggunaan Design Thinking dalam Mengatasi Kebosanan Peserta Didik di Kelas. Journal of Innovation and Teacher Professionalism, 3(2), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.17977/um084v3i22025p333-339
Handayani, N. N. L. (2023). Determination of Realistic Mathematics Education on problem solving with numeracy literacy covariables. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 56(2), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v56i2.63288
Harianti, F. (2018). Pengaruh model pembelajaran guided discovery learning terhadap kemampuan pemahaman dan hasil belajar siswa materi operasi aljabar kelas VII SMP. MUST: Journal of Mathematics Education, Science and Technology, 3(1), 82–91.
Isnaintri, E., Yuhana, Y., & Fatah, A. (2024).
Enhancing problem-solving skills through numeracy instrument design: Incorporating Pandeglang’s local wisdom in geometry content. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 18(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.v18i1.15677
Jonathan, K. (2022). Tips membangun user persona bagi pemilik perusahaan.
Kalsum, U., & Sulastri, S. (2021). Analisis kemampuan literasi numerasi peserta didik pada kelas 5 SDN 027 Takatidung. Jurnal Keren, 1(5), 1–7.
Kemdikbud RI. (2020). AKM dan implikasinya pada pembelajaran. Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan dan Perbukuan Kemdikbud.
Kemendikbudristek. (2020). Asesmen nasional: Asesmen kompetensi minimum (AKM), survei karakter, dan survei lingkungan belajar. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.
Kemendikbudristek. (2020). Panduan asesmen kompetensi minimum. Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.
Kurniawati, I., & Kurniasari, I. (2019). Literasi matematika siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal PISA konten space and shape ditinjau dari kecerdasan majemuk. MATHEdunesa, 8.
Mahmud, M. R., & Pratiwi, I. M. (2019). Literasi numerasi siswa dalam pemecahan masalah tidak terstruktur. Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 69–88.
Man, M. Z. G., Hidayat, R., Kashmir, M. K., Suhaimi, N. F., Adnan, M., & Saswandila, A. (2022). Design thinking in mathematics education for primary school: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(12), 190–208. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.12.11
Malik, T. A. F., Prasetya, B. P., & Sukmaraga, A. A. (2024). Perancangan buku jurnal untuk membantu meningkatkan self love dalam mengatasi quarter life crisis usia 18 24 tahun di Indonesia menggunakan metode Design Thinking. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 4(3), 14454–14468. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i3.12051
Muhtarom, Juniati, D., & Siswono, T. (2017). Pengembangan angket keyakinan terhadap. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 55–64.
Muhtarom, Nizaruddin, Nursyahidah, F., & Happy, N. (2019). The effectiveness of realistic mathematics education to improve students’ multi-representation ability. Infinity Journal, 8(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v8i1.p21-30
Nabila, A. (2023). Analisis kemampuan literasi numerasi dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita kecepatan dan debit di kelas V UPTD SDN Mekarjaya 14 Depok.
Nasoha, S. R., Araiku, J., Pratiwi, W. D., & Yusup, M. (2022). Kemampuan numerasi siswa melalui implementasi bahan ajar matematika berbasis Problem Based Learning. Indiktika: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.31851/indiktika.v4i2.7903
Nugroho, A. A., Dwijayanti, I., Prayito, M., Noordin, M. K., & Fenyvesi, K. (2024).
Design of algebra digital book on mixed reality-based to improve learner’s numeracy literacy. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i1.13744
Nugroho, A. A., Dwijayanti, I., & Atmoko, P. Y. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Penemuan Dan Lingkungan Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Melalui Meta Analisis. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 147. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i1.2659
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Pou, Z. S., Badari, S. R., Pala, M. Y., Askanita, D. A., Wirawan, M. D. S., & Lefrida, R. (2024). Implementation of Design Thinking on Match-up interactive media for cell learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(4), 1837–1846. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i4.4999
Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran Kemendikbud. (2020). Buku pegangan asesmen kompetensi minimum. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. https://pusmenjar.kemdikbud.go.id
Putri, F. E., Zelvia, M. F., Kumala, N. R. A. C., & Khusaini, K. (2024). Penerapan metode Design Thinking pada perancangan media pembelajaran ular tangga IPA (ULTAPA) sebagai peluang peningkatan literasi dan numerasi siswa SMPN 28 Malang. Jurnal MIPA dan Pembelajarannya, 4(6), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.17977/um067v4i62024p2
Riyadi, D., Fitria, R. M., & Anggraini, D. (2024). Pengembangan pembelajaran matematika berbasis Design Thinking dalam meningkatkan literasi numerasi siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 19(1), 32–40.
Riyadi, S., Jayanti, I. D., & Purwosetiyono, D. (2024). Eksplorasi desain media android untuk meningkatkan kemampuan numerasi siswa dengan metode Design Thinking. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika (JIPMat), 9(1), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v9i1.495
Riyadi, R., Prasetya, Y. D., & Wibowo, P. W. (2024). Implementasi pembelajaran Design Thinking untuk meningkatkan keterampilan abad 21 siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 10(1), 45–58.
Riyadi, S., Wulandari, R. D., & Suryani, N. (2024). Design Thinking dalam pembelajaran matematika: Inovasi untuk mengasah kemampuan abad 21. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.21009/JIPM.091.02
Silvia, N., & Asdarina, Y. (2024). Pembelajaran bermakna di era digital: Tantangan dan peluang. Jurnal Pendidikan Kontemporer, 6(1), 11–20.
Silvia, N., & Asdarina, Y. (2024). Pembelajaran bermakna abad 21: Strategi penerapan dalam kurikulum merdeka. Jurnal Pendidikan Kontekstual Indonesia, 5(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpki.v5i1.5678
Syaflita, D., Efendi, R., Muslim, & Azhar. (2024). Implementation of Design Thinking to support creativity oriented learning: A literature review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(4), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i4.6788
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Susanti, E., Delfi, I., Hapizah, H., Indaryanti, I., Isrok’atun, I., & Simarmata, R. H. (2024). Designing number pattern questions to assess students with kinesthetic learning styles in mathematical thinking. Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.35706/sjme.v8i1.9998
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.
Utomo, B., Hidayah, R., & Wibowo, A. (2024). Analisis kesulitan belajar matematika siswa SMK di Kota Semarang. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 9(1), 20–30.
Utomo, R. A., Lestari, A. P., & Wulandari, S. (2024). Persepsi siswa SMK terhadap pembelajaran matematika dan tantangan numerasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 12(1), 88–97.
Utomo, R. B., Ramadhani, A. H., & Lestari, M. (2024). Analisis kesulitan belajar matematika siswa SMK di Kota Semarang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Vokasi, 6(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.22202/jpmv.v6i1.3210
Wulandari, F., & Handayani, D. (2020). Analisis kemampuan numerasi siswa SMK dalam konteks AKM. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 78–84.
Yuliani, N., & Mardapi, D. (2023). Implementasi kurikulum merdeka dalam pembelajaran numerasi: Peluang dan tantangan. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 14(2), 101–112.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/kontinu.9.2.167-189
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Sulistiyorini Sulistiyorini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Kontinu Journal is published by the Mathematics Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education (FKIP), Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (Unissula).
Contact us: GKB, 2nd Floor, FKIP Unissula, Jl. Raya Kaligawe Km.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk, Semarang 50112.
Email: jurnal.kontinu@unissula.ac.id