Demokratisasi atau Komersialisasi? Kritik terhadap Model Voting Berbayar pada Program Kompetisi Musik di Indonesia

Authors

  • Nurohmat Nurohmat Institut Media Digital EMTEK
  • Dian Dian Institut Media Digital EMTEK
  • Rewindinar Rewindinar Institut Media Digital EMTEK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30659/jikm.v14i1.50467

Keywords:

voting berbayar, Virtual Gift, kompetisi talenta, monetisasi media, etika penyiaran, perlindungan konsumen

Abstract

The development of digital technology has transformed the landscape of Indonesia's television entertainment industry, including audience participation mechanisms in music competition programs. This research examines the phenomenon of paid voting systems through Virtual Gifts implemented in a dangdut music competition program on a national private television station in 2025. Using a qualitative approach with case study methods, this research analyzes the social, economic, and ethical implications of the transformation of judging systems that integrate digital donations as an assessment component. Data were collected through mass media content analysis, social media documentation, and review of relevant regulations. Research findings indicate that the Virtual Gift system creates a paradox between participation democratization and competition commercialization, where the financial capacity of audiences potentially determines competition outcomes more than contestants' talent quality. The emerging controversy indicates a regulatory vacuum regarding monetization boundaries in television competition programs, raising ethical questions about fairness, transparency, and consumer protection. This research recommends the need for a comprehensive regulatory framework to govern paid voting systems to maintain competition integrity and protect audience rights as consumers.

Perkembangan teknologi digital telah mengubah lanskap industri hiburan televisi di Indonesia, termasuk dalam mekanisme partisipasi audiens pada program kompetisi musik. Penelitian ini mengkaji fenomena sistem voting berbayar melalui Virtual Gift yang diterapkan pada salah satu program kompetisi musik dangdut di televisi swasta nasional tahun 2025. Melalui pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode studi kasus, penelitian ini menganalisis implikasi sosial, ekonomi, dan etika dari transformasi sistem penjurian yang mengintegrasikan donasi digital sebagai komponen penilaian. Data dikumpulkan melalui analisis konten media massa, dokumentasi media sosial, dan kajian regulasi terkait. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sistem Virtual Gift menciptakan paradoks antara demokratisasi partisipasi dan komersialisasi kompetisi, di mana kemampuan finansial audiens berpotensi lebih menentukan hasil kompetisi dibandingkan kualitas talenta peserta. Kontroversi yang muncul mengindikasikan kekosongan regulasi yang jelas mengenai batasan monetisasi dalam program kompetisi televisi, serta menimbulkan pertanyaan etis tentang keadilan, transparansi, dan perlindungan konsumen. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan perlunya kerangka regulasi yang komprehensif untuk mengatur sistem voting berbayar guna menjaga integritas kompetisi dan melindungi hak audiens sebagai konsumen.

References

Fuchs, C. (2014). Digital Labour and Karl Marx. New York: Routledge.

Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.

Jenkins, H., Ito, M., & Boyd, D. (2016). Participatory Culture in a Networked Era: A Conversation on Youth, Learning, Commerce, and Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

McChesney, R. W. (2013). Digital Disconnect: How Capitalism is Turning the Internet Against Democracy. New York: The New Press.

Mosco, V. (2009). The Political Economy of Communication (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.

Nugroho, Y., Putri, D. A., & Laksmi, S. (2012). Mapping the Landscape of the Media Industry in Contemporary Indonesia. Jakarta: Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance & HIVOS Regional Office Southeast Asia.

Scholz, T. (Ed.). (2013). Digital Labor: The Internet as Playground and Factory. New York: Routledge.

Shun, L. K. & Huat, C. B. (2015). The Social and Economic Consequences of Reality TV: Global Perspectives. London: Routledge.

Siregar, A. E., Suwardi, H., & Ishadi, S. K. (2010). Ekonomi Politik Media Penyiaran. Yogyakarta: LKIS Printing Cemerlang.

Terranova, T. (2004). Network Culture: Politics for the Information Age. London: Pluto Press.

Van Dijck, J. (2013). The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2018). The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Andrejevic, M. (2004). Reality TV: The Work of Being Watched. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 21(4), 253-282.

Arvidsson, A., & Colleoni, E. (2012). Value in Informational Capitalism and on the Internet. The Information Society, 28(3), 135-150.

Banks, J., & Deuze, M. (2009). Co-creative Labour. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 12(5), 419-431.

Baym, N. K., & Burnett, R. (2009). Amateur Experts: International Fan Labour in Swedish Independent Music. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 12(5), 433-449.

Couldry, N. (2010). Why Voice Matters: Culture and Politics After Neoliberalism. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(4), 193-215.

Deuze, M. (2007). Media Work. Digital Media and Society Series. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Flew, T., & Cunningham, S. (2010). Creative Industries after the First Decade of Debate. The Information Society, 26(2), 113-123.

Hearn, A. (2010). Structuring Feeling: Web 2.0, Online Ranking and Rating, and the Digital 'Reputation' Economy. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 10(3/4), 421-438.

Ibrahim, I. S., & Gazali, E. (2014). Ekonomi Politik Media Televisi: Analisis Sistem Kepemilikan Media di Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 3(1), 45-62.

Jarrett, K. (2015). Feminism, Labour and Digital Media: The Digital Housewife. New Media & Society, 16(3), 293-313.

Lazzarato, M. (1996). Immaterial Labour. Dalam P. Virno & M. Hardt (Eds.), Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics (pp. 133-147). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Noviani, R., & Khoir, I. A. (2016). Industri Televisi dan Konvergensi Media di Indonesia: Studi Ekonomi Politik Media. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 2(6), 501-515.

Nugroho, Y. (2011). Opening the Black Box: The Adoption of Innovations in the Voluntary Sector—The Case of Indonesian Civil Society Organisations. Research Policy, 40(5), 761-777.

Postill, J., & Pink, S. (2012). Social Media Ethnography: The Digital Researcher in a Messy Web. Media International Australia, 145(1), 123-134.

Prasetyo, H. A., & Sari, D. K. (2019). Kompetisi Talenta di Televisi Indonesia: Antara Ajang Pencarian Bakat dan Komodifikasi. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 16(2), 167-180.

Rey, P. J. (2012). Alienation, Exploitation, and Social Media. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(4), 399-420.

Ritzer, G., & Jurgenson, N. (2010). Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The Nature of Capitalism in the Age of the Digital 'Prosumer'. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1), 13-36.

Setiawan, I., & Kurnia, N. (2018). Partisipasi Audiens dalam Industri Televisi Indonesia: Dari Pasif ke Aktif. Komunikator, 10(1), 23-35.

Sutrisno, D. (2020). Platform Ekonomi Digital dan Transformasi Industri Hiburan Indonesia. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi dan Media, 24(1), 89-104.

Terranova, T. (2000). Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy. Social Text, 18(2), 33-58.

Wiratraman, H. P. (2017). Perlindungan Konsumen dalam Transaksi Elektronik di Indonesia: Kajian Hukum dan Implementasi. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 47(3), 325-348.

Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia (APJII). (2024). Profil Pengguna Internet Indonesia 2024. Jakarta: APJII. Diakses dari https://apjii.or.id

Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia. (2023). Pedoman Perilaku Penyiaran dan Standar Program Siaran (P3-SPS). Jakarta: KPI. Diakses dari https://kpi.go.id

Nielsen Media Research. (2025). Television Audience Measurement Indonesia 2025. Jakarta: Nielsen.

Republik Indonesia. (1999). Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 1999 Nomor 42. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.

Republik Indonesia. (2002). Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2002 tentang Penyiaran. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2002 Nomor 139. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.

Republik Indonesia. (2008). Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2008 Nomor 58. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.

Republik Indonesia. (2016). Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2016 Nomor 251. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.

Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia. (2012). Peraturan KPI Nomor 01/P/KPI/03/2012 tentang Pedoman Perilaku Penyiaran. Jakarta: KPI.

Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia. (2012). Peraturan KPI Nomor 02/P/KPI/03/2012 tentang Standar Program Siaran. Jakarta: KPI.

Heryanto, A. (2013). Upgraded Piety and Pleasure: The New Middle Class and Islam in Indonesian Popular Culture. Dalam Southeast Asian Middle Classes: Prospects for Social Change and Democratisation (pp. 60-82). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Lim, M. (2012). The League of Thirteen: Media Concentration in Indonesia. Dalam Participatory Media Lab Report. Tempe: Arizona State University.

Nugroho, Y. (2014). Indonesia's Media Landscape: A Country Report. Dalam Open Society Media Program. New York: Open Society Foundations.

Tesis dan Disertasi

Adiputra, W. M. (2018). Komodifikasi Konten dalam Program Reality Show di Televisi Indonesia (Tesis Magister). Universitas Indonesia, Depok.

Kusumaningrat, H. (2019). Ekonomi Politik Industri Televisi di Era Digital: Studi Kasus Konglomerasi Media (Disertasi Doktor). Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

Rahmawati, D. (2020). Partisipasi Audiens dan Monetisasi Konten: Studi Etnografi Virtual tentang Fandom K-Pop di Indonesia (Tesis Magister). Universitas Indonesia, Depok.

We Are Social & Hootsuite. (2025). Digital 2025: Indonesia. Singapore: We Are Social.

World Bank. (2024). Indonesia Economic Prospects: The Digital Economy. Jakarta: World Bank Office Jakarta.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Statistik Telekomunikasi Indonesia 2024. Jakarta: BPS.

Asian Development Bank. (2023). Digital Platforms and Competition Policy in Southeast Asia. Manila: ADB.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31