Reconstructing Spatial Planning Law Through Neo-Progressivism: Towards an Integrated Jurisprudential Architecture
Abstract
Spatial planning law has evolved into a complex legal domain where environmental sustainability, governance, legal certainty, economic development, and social justice must be reconciled within an increasingly interconnected legal landscape. However, existing jurisprudential approaches generally address these dimensions separately, resulting in fragmented legal reasoning and limiting the capacity of spatial planning law to respond to contemporary challenges. This article aims to reconstruct spatial planning law through Neo-Progressivism by proposing an Integrated Jurisprudential Architecture capable of harmonizing justice, sustainability, governance, institutional legitimacy, and intergenerational responsibility within a coherent legal framework. The study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, philosophical, and comparative approaches. It critically analyses major jurisprudential traditions, including Natural Law, Legal Positivism, Responsive Law, Progressive Law, and contemporary sustainability discourse, to formulate a reconstructed theoretical framework for spatial planning law. The findings demonstrate that the principal challenge of contemporary spatial planning law is no longer merely regulatory enforcement, but the absence of an integrated jurisprudential architecture capable of reconstructing the relationships among legitimate legal values. To address this theoretical gap, the article introduces Neo-Progressivism, grounded in the First Principle that justice without sustainability is temporary justice, and advances Sustainable Justice together with the Integrated Legal Order as the normative orientation for reconstructing spatial planning law. The study concludes that Neo-Progressivism offers a novel jurisprudential framework that extends beyond sectoral legal approaches by integrating the enduring contributions of existing jurisprudential traditions into a coherent architecture capable of sustaining justice throughout the continuing evolution of civilization.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Banikoi, H., Dakyaga, F., & Cobbinah, P. B. (2024). Embedding spatial planning in contemporary multi-level governance: The sustainability entanglement. Land Use Policy, 146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107324
Bosselmann, K. (2016). The Principle of Sustainability: Transforming Law and Governance. In The Principle of Sustainability: Transforming Law and Governance. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315553962
Chateaubriand, A., & de Lucena, G. M. R. (2022). THE CONCEPT OF LAW. Revista de Direito Civil Contemporaneo, 33(9). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351000277-3
Gerasimova, K. (2017). Our common future. In Our Common Future. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781912281220
Healey, P. (2006). URBAN COMPLEXITY AND SPATIAL STRATEGIES: TOWARDS A RELATIONAL PLANNING FOR OUR TIMES. In Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203099414
Hutchinson, T., & Duncan, N. (2012). Defining and Describing What We Do: Doctrinal Legal Research. Deakin Law Review, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2012vol17no1art70
Morin, E. (2004). Epistemology of complexity Edgar Morin. Gazeta de Antropología, 20.
Needham, B., Buitelaar, E., & Hartmann, T. (2018). Planning, law and economics: The rules we make for using land. In Planning, Law and Economics: The Rules We Make for Using Land. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315111278
Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (2017). Law and society in transition: Toward responsive law. In Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203787540
Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. In Science (Vol. 325, Number 5939). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133
Penelitian, L., Hasil, P., Ensiklopedia, P., & Hukum, F. (2024). THE PURE THEORY OF LAW: HANS KELSEN. Ensiklopedia of Journal, 6(3).
Satjipto Rahardjo. (2010). Hukum Progresif: Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia. In Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing. (Vol. 1, Number 1).
Smits, J. M. (2015). What is Legal Doctrine? On the Aims and Methods of Legal-Dogmatic Research. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2644088
Sun, L. (2014). Takings international: A comparative perspective on land use regulations and compensation rights. Planning Theory & Practice, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2014.902907
Tollefsen, C. (2020). The Good of Play in John Finnis’s «Natural Law and Natural Rights». Persona y Derecho. https://doi.org/10.15581/011.83.009
Writer, S. (2023). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development | Department of Economic and Social Affairs. In United Nations.
Regulations :
Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia of 1945.
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 26 of 2007 on Spatial Planning.
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management.
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 of 2023 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 on Job Creation as Law.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/ldj.8.3.1168-1082
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Law Development Journal has been indexed in:







