Saving Frozen Embryos Through Adoption Agreements: Bridging The Legal & Bioethical Gap in Indonesian Private Civil Law

Dewi Padusi Daeng Muri, Irawan Soerodjo, Carolus Boromeus Kusmaryanto, Putra Hutomo

Abstract


This study examines the legal and bioethical issues surrounding remaining frozen embryos in Indonesia, particularly the lack of regulations governing their use through embryo adoption. Current regulations require the destruction of unused embryos, creating a legal and ethical dilemma as embryos are considered potential human life with a right to life. This study uses a socio-legal approach with legal and comparative analysis to evaluate existing regulations and practices across several countries. The findings indicate a significant legal gap in Indonesia regarding embryo adoption, resulting in a lack of legal protection for prospective parents and embryos. This study proposes embryo adoption as a viable legal and bioethical solution to ensure embryo protection and the fulfillment of reproductive rights, and contributes to the development of a more comprehensive legal framework in private civil law.


Keywords


Adoption; Agreement; Bioethics; Frozen Embryos; Protection.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journal:

Abu-Rabia, A. (2013). Infertility and surrogacy in Islamic societies: Sociocultural, psychological, ethical, and religious dilemmas. Open Journal of Psychology, 6, 54–60.

Al Hikam, I. L., & Nawangsa, A. T. (2026). Analisis Dampak Penerapan PSAK 73 Terhadap Laporan Keuangan; Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan Ritel Di Indonesia. Jimmi: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin, 3(1), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.71153/jimmi.v3i1.448

Aznar-Lucea, J., Martínez-Peris, M., & Navarro-Illana, P. (2016). Frozen embryo adoption. Therapeía, 103–120.

Blyth, E., Lui, S., & Frith, L. (2017). Relationships and boundaries between donor and recipient families following embryo adoption.

Clark, P. A. (2014). Ethical Implications of Embryo Adoption. In C. S. Atwood & S. V. Meethal (Eds.), Pluripotent Stem Cell Biology—Advances in Mechanisms, Methods and Models. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/58592

Cromer, R. (2019). Making ethnic embryos: Race in embryo adoption in the United States. Medical Anthropology, 38(7), 603–619.

Cristina, J., & Manalu, I. (2025). Analisis Peran A lat Bukti dan Keterangan Saksi dalam Menentukan Keputusan Pengadilan Pidana. 3(1), 245–260.

Delarosa, S. (2024). REFLEKSI FILSAFAT KEADILAN HUKUM ALAM DAN POSITIVISME HUKUM MELALUI KISAH LES MISÉRABLES. Gloria Justitia, 4(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.25170/gloriajustitia.v4i1.5633

Dewi, N. P. K., & Raditya, I. B. Y. (2025). STATUS HUKUM EMBRIO BEKU DALAM PERJANJIAN SIMPAN: TINJAUAN HUKUM PERDATA SAAT TERJADI PERCERAIAN. 3(10), 2–17.

Frith, L., Blyth, E., & Lui, S. (2017). Building families through embryo adoption. Human Reproduction, 32(5), 1092–1099.

Geldberg, N. (2016). Zygote Zeitgeist: Legal Complexities in the Expanding Practice of Embryo Donation. 49(4), 821–830.

Goedeke, S., & Daniels, K. R. (2017). Embryo donation or embryo adoption? A critical analysis. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 31, 1–19.

Hallich, O. (2018). Embryo donation and adoption: Conceptual and normative issues. Bioethics.

Inayatillah, R., Judiasih, S. D., & Permatahari, M. (2025). Embryo Frozen Storage Agreement According to Civil Law in Indonesia. 9(2), 293–295. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v9i2.2268

Isnawan, F. (2016). KAJIAN FILOSOFIS PRO DAN KONTRA DILARANGNYA EUTHANANSIA. 2(1), 334–340.

Machado, C. S. (2020). The fate of surplus embryos: Ethical and emotional impacts on assisted reproduction. JBRA Assisted Reproduction, 1(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20200015

Mahmoud, A. (2022). Islamic Bioethics: National Regulations and Guidelines of Human Stem Cell Research in the Muslim World [Master of Arts, Chapman University]. https://doi.org/10.36837/chapman.000386

Maulidia, G. I., Rofiqi, T. M., & Wp, K. N. F. (2022). Hukum Dan Perubahan Masyarakat: Pendekatan Filsafat Roscoe Pound. 1(2), 3–12.

Mohammad Maulana & Nur Akifah Janur. (2020). TANGGUNG JAWAB NEGARA DALAM PEMENUHAN HAM DI BIDANG EKONOMI, SOCIAL, DAN BUDAYA. QISTHOSIA : Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum, 1(2), 107–129. https://doi.org/10.46870/jhki.v1i2.121

Monez, M. Y. J. (2020). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM ATAS HAK UNTUK MELANJUTKAN KETURUNAN DALAM SURROGATE MOTHER. Jurisprudentie : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, 7(2), 216. https://doi.org/10.24252/jurisprudentie.v7i2.13186

Murni, D. N. S., Kes, M., & Bansu, I. A. (2025). KESEHATAN REPRODUKSI: KESUBURAN DAN PERMASALAHANNYA, SERTA PERAN TEMAN SEBAYA. Nuansa Fajar Cemerlang.

Nanur, F. N., P. Janggu, J., Golo, T., Dafiq, N., & Djerubu, D. (2022). Persepsi Pasangan Infertil Terhadap Masalah Infertilitas di Kecamatan Langke Rembong. JIK JURNAL ILMU KESEHATAN, 6(2), 317. https://doi.org/10.33757/jik.v6i2.558

Noviantari, A., & Khairi. (2020). Pemanfaatan Teknologi Biologi Sel Dalam Dunia Kedokteran Modern. 1(1), 122–126.

Prayoga, D. A., Husodo, J. A., & Maharani, A. E. P. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Warga Negara Dengan Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2019 Tentang Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Nasional. 2(2), 188–195.

Putra, M. D. (2021). Negara Kesejahteraan (Welfare State) dalam Perspektif Pancasila. Likhitaprajna Jurnal ilmiah, 23(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.37303/likhitaprajna.v23i2.199

Sari, J. P., Santosa, A. A. G. D. H., & Winata, I. G. S. (2024). Pemanfaatan Sisa Embrio Beku Program Bayi Tabung Sebagai Terapi Transplantasi Sel Punca di Indonesia. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 7(1), 300–313. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i1.8286

Sari, J. P., Santosa, A. A. G. D. H., & Winata, I. G. S. (2024). Utilization of surplus frozen embryos in IVF programs. Jurnal USM Law Review, 7(2).

Setyowati, T. (2024). Menelisik Kompromi Teologis dan Etis atas Polemik Penelitian dan Terapi Stem Cell Embrionik. Aradha: Journal of Divinity, Peace and Conflict Studies, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.21460/aradha.2023.33.1317

Sofiani, N., & Frinaldi, A. (2023). DAMPAK PERKEMBANGAN ILMU PENGETAHUAN DAN TEKNOLOGI TERHADAP BUDAYA. Menara Ilmu, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.31869/mi.v17i2.4577

Sulaiman, E. (2016). HUKUM DAN KEPENTINGAN MASYARAKAT. 11(1), 100–110.

Suwandono, A. (2023). Pemahaman Aspek-Aspek Hukum Perjanjian dalam Perancangan Kontrak untuk Mewujudkan Perlindungan Para Pihak. Abdibaraya: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.53863/abdibaraya.v2i01.783

Syamsu, S., & Fahmi, M. N. (2024). Jaminan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Dinamika Perkembangan Konstitusional. Syntax Idea, 6(6), 2728–2736. https://doi.org/10.46799/syntax-idea.v6i6.3513

Wardani, A., & Delasa, N. (2023). Keadilan Hukum Indonesia: Thomas Aquinas mengenai Keadilan Hukum Dalam Kehidupan Sebagai Bangsa Pluralis. 1(1), 2–22.

Walters, R. (2016). Embryo adoption as an ethical alternative.

Yue, Z., & MacKellar, C. (2024). A quantitative analysis of stored frozen surplus embryos in the UK. The New Bioethics, 30(3), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2024.2354979

Yulis, S. (2025). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Kerangka Analisis Isu Hukum Kontemporer. 4(9), 808–812. https://jurnal.locusmedia.id/index.php/jalr/article/download/800/348

Book:

Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of biomedical ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Kusmaryanto, C. B. (2022). Bioethics fundamentals. Gramedia.

Mangesti, Y. A. (2016). Humanistic legal paradigm.

Regulation:

Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection.

UNESCO. (2005). Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.

Fadli, R. (2022). Frozen embryo transfer, a new method of IVF. Halodoc.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/ldj.8.1.235-256

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Law Development Journal has been indexed by:

Editorial Office: RUMAH JURNAL FH UNISSULA (RJFHU) 2nd Floor, Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. 

Phone: +62 8214461245
Email: ldj@unissula.ac.id

Creative Commons License

LAW DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL (eISSN : 2747-2604), This work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).