The Protection of Creditors as Fiduciary Recipients in Debt Transfers Without Good Faith in Credit Agreements (Study of Decision Number 132/PID.B/2023/PN.SPG)

Rajwa Khaicirinu Riyanto, Iwan Erar Joesoef

Abstract


One of the problems of a credit agreement is the transfer of debt (take over credit) underhand without the knowledge of the creditor as the fiduciary recipient. Therefore, this paper is conducted to analyze the protection for creditors as fiduciary recipients in the transfer of debt (take over credit) underhand without the knowledge of the creditor in one of the cases, namely Decision Number 132 / PID.B / 2023 / PN. Spg. This paper is a qualitative normative whose data collection uses literature studies and is analyzed using a statutory approach and a case approach. This study concludes that in the case of Decision Number 132 / PID.B / 2023 / PN.Spg, the debt transfer agreement (take over credit) between the debtor and a third party is invalid and null and void because it violates the objective principles in the terms of the agreement. The transfer of debt (take over credit) at PT Federal International Finance can be legal and in accordance with the law if it complies with the procedures determined by PT Federal International Finance as the creditor, one of which is by consulting and contacting and the agreement is known and approved by the creditor.


Keywords


Credit; Debt; Protection; Transfers.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Abdullah, J. (2016). Jaminan Fidusia di Indonesia (Tata Cara Pendaftaran dan Eksekusi). 04 (02). 115-125. Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen Islam. Universitas Darussalam Gontor.

Clarissa, N. B. & Badriyah, S. M. (2023). Efektivitas Pendaftaran Jaminan Fidusia Secara Online oleh Notaris. 16 (1). 426-438. NOTARIUS. Universitas Diponegoro.

Dewi, P. E. T. (2024). Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia: Analisis Konflik Norma dalam UU Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019. 01 (01). 60-72. INVENTION: Journal of Intellectual Property Law. Universitas Ngurah Rai.

Junaedi, B., Tjoanda, M., & Berlianty, T. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Pada Debitur Atas Penarikan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Melalui Parate Eksekusi. 1 (2). 124-132. PATTIMURA Legal Journal. Universitas Pattimura.

Khairini, N. & Bustamam, K. (2018). Perjanjian dan Jaminan Fidusia. 3 (2). 15-30. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perudangan-undangan dan pranata sosial. Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara.

Lalo, R. (2019). Tinjauan Yuridis Pelaksanaan Pendaftaran Jaminan Fidusia Secara Elektronik (Online). VII (1). 120-135. Jurnal Lex Privatum. Universitas Sam Ratulangi.

Lumbanraja, E. D. T. (2021). Eksekusi Benda Jaminan Fidusia: Analisis Konseptual dalam Undang-Undang Jaminan Fidusia. 8 (2). 132-150. Diponegoro Private Law Review. Universitas Diponegoro.

Mulyana, M. J., et al. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Pembiayaan Penjaminan Fidusia. 08 (02). 245-259. Justicia Sains: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. Universitas Bandar Lampung.

Nofianti, I. N., et al. (2022). Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Apabila Debitur Cidera Janji. 3 (2). 144-159. Supremasi Jurnal Hukum. Universitas Muslim Indonesia.

Nugraha, S. N. & Rahmawati, N. (2021). Cidera Janji (Wanprestasi) dalam Perjanjian Fidusia. 2 (2). 75-88. Jurnal Al-Wasath. Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia.

Nurudin, I. B. A. (2016). Pelaksanaan Pendaftaran Jaminan Fidusia Melalui Online oleh Kreditor Penerima Fidusia. 5 (3). 1-8. Diponegoro Law Journal. Universitas Diponegoro.

Paramita, B. P. (2019). Problematika Penarikan Paksa Kendaraan Bermotor Objek Jaminan Fidusia. 19 (1). 1-15. Jurnal Media Hukum dan Peradilan. Universitas Pamulang.

Pramudya, A. & Pratiwi, T. P. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Melalui Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Perjanjian Pembiayaan Kendaraan Bermotor Roda Dua. 3 (1). 36-47. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi (JUPE). Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Rasyid, Y. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Penerimaan Fidusia Ketika Benda Yang Diterimanya Dirampas Negara dalam Perkara Korupsi. 29 (1). 47-67. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM. Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Sayuti, A. T. & Erwita, Y. (2020). Parate Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia: Urgensi dan Rekonstruksi Hukum setelah PMK Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. 3 (2). 150-165. Soematra Law Review. Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara.

Sharen, S. (2020). Kepastian Hukum Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia. 9 (1). 45-56. Binamulia Hukum. Universitas Bandar Lampung.

Soegianto, et al. (2019). Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Kajian Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia. 4 (2). 208-219. Jurnal Ius Constituendum. Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Subagiyo, D. T. (2019). Legal Standing Debitor Selama Menguasai Objek Jaminan Fidusia. 18 (2). 146-160. Law Review. Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta.

Sutrahitu, M. E., et al. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Hak Kepemilikan Objek Jaminan Fidusia yang telah dialihkan Tanpa sepengetahuan Kreditur. 3 (2). 140-157. TATOHI Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. Universitas Pattimura.

Syafrida, et al. (2020). Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU/XVII/2019. 11 (1). 107-127. ADIL: Jurnal Hukum. Universitas Malikussaleh.

Ufatih, N. A. (2021). Pendaftaran Akta Jaminan Fidusia Secara Online. 18 (3). 622-631. Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial Dan Keagamaan. Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Jember.

Vinaya, I. & Anggoro, T. (2021). Tanggung Jawab Debitur Yang Wanprestasi Terhadap Kreditur Akibat Sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia Yang Tidak Sah. 27. 40-55. Jurnal Independent. Universitas Indonesia.

Books & Others:

N. Latukau, B. Wirarno, B. Sudjito, 2015, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditor Atas Objek Jaminan Fidusia Yang Dibebani Fidusia Ulang Oleh Debitor Yang Sama, Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, https://www.neliti.com/id/publications/35692/perlindungan-hukum-bagi-kreditor-atas-objek-jaminan-fidusia-yang-dibebani-fidusi#cite

Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mahmudji, 2003, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta,

Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamuji, 2010, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, PT Grafindo Media Pratama, Jakarta,

Thomas Suyatno, 2007, Dasar-Dasar Perkreditan, PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta,

Regulation:

Civil Code

Criminal Code

Law Number 10 of 1998 concerning Amendments to Law Number 7 of 1992 concerning Banking

Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees

Minister of Justice Decree No. 1551/KMK.013/1989

Presidential Decree of the Republic of Indonesia Number 61 of 1988 concerning Financing Institutions in conjunction with Article 1 letter (b) of the Decree of the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1251/KMK.013/1988 concerning Provisions and Procedures for the Implementation of Financing Institutions in conjunction with Article 1 number (1) of Presidential Regulation Number 9 of 2009

Internet:

https://skorku.id/waspada-ini-bahaya-over-kredit-bawah-tangan/, accessed on September 8, 2025 at 12:24 WIB.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/ldj.7.3.531-540

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Law Development Journal has been indexed in: