Responsibility of the Directorate General of Intellectual Property regarding The Passing Off Case Between Starbucks Coffee & Starbucks Cigarettes (Case Study 836 K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2022)
Abstract
The aim of this research is to examine the responsibility of the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DJKI) and to examine the considerations of the Panel of Judges regarding the brand passing off case between Starbucks Coffee and Starbucks Cigarettes based on Decision Number 836 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2022. DJKI's responsibility in cases of passing off brands has not been specifically regulated and written in a statutory regulation. However, DJKI has an obligation to comply with court decisions that have permanent legal force in brand cancellation lawsuits. Therefore, DJKI's responsibility for the case of brand passing off between Starbucks Coffee and Starbucks Cigarettes based on Decision Number 836 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2022 is to cancel the registration of the Starbucks Cigarette Brand with registration number IDM000342818 in class 34 owned by the Defendant, PT STTC from the Register Brand General. Furthermore, the considerations of the Panel of Judges in Decision Number 836 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2022 are in accordance with and were guided by Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Brands and Geographical Indications. The Panel of Judges has determined PT STTC as the party found guilty of violating Article 21 section (1) letter c and Article 21 section (3) of the MIG Law as well as the Panel of Judges has also determined that the Starbucks brand owned by Starbucks Corporation is a well-known brand based on the criteria regulated in the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia No. 12 of 2021 concerning Trademark Registration.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journals:
Dwi Seno Wijanarko & Slamet Pribadi. Perlindungan Hukum Preventif terhadap Merek Dagang di Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. Jurnal Penelitian Universitas Kuningan, 13(2). 192-201
Fathiya Al’Uzma, OK. Saidin, T. Keizerina Devi Azwar, & Syarifah Lisa Andriati Andriati. Analisis Putusan dan Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Perkara Sengketa Merek antara Starbucks Corporation Melawan Sumatera Tobacco Trading Company (Studi Putusan Makamah Agung Nomor 836 K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2022). Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 2(4). 355-364
Hertanti Pindayani. (2018). Tanggung Jawab Direktorat Jenderal Hak Kekayaan Intelektual terhadap Pemegang Hak atas Merek dalam Hal Ada Putusan Pembatalan Merek, Jurnal Authentica, 1(1). 42-50
Michael & Christine S.T. Kansil. Analisis Tanggung Jawab Direktorat Jenderal HAKI terhadap Kasus Pendomplengan Nama/Passing Off terhadap Merek Terkenal M&G Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 526K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2020). Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 4(2). 424-448
Muhamad Shafwan Afif & Heru Sugiyono. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Merek Terkenal di Indonesia. Jurnal USM Law Review, 4(2). 565-585
Books:
Antonius Sudirman. (2007). Hati Nurani Hakim dan Putusannya. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti
Direktorat Perindustrian Republik Indonesia. (2007). Kebijakan Pemerintah dalam Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan Liberalisasi Perdagangan Profesi di Bidang Hukum. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Industri Kecil Menengah
Hans Kelsen. (2006). Teori Hukum Murni: Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum Normatif, Terjemahan: Raisul Muttaqien. Bandung: PT. Rineka Cipta
Khoirul Hidayah. (2017). Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Maang: Setara Press
Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram: Mataram University Press
Muhammad Siddiq Armia. (2022). Penentuan Metode dan Pendekatan Penelitian Hukum. Banda Aceh: Lembaga Kajian Konstitusi Indonesia
Soedjono Dirdjosisworo. (2005). Antisipasi terhadap Bisnis Curang: Pengalaman Negara Maju dalam Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (Intellectual Property) dan Pengaturan E-Commerce Serta Penyesuaian Undang-Undang HKI Indonesia. Bandung: CV Utomo
Regulations:
Act No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications
Civil Code
Director General of Intellectual Property Regulation Number: HKI-01.0T.01.01 of 2020 Regarding the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct for Employees of the Directorate General of Intellectual Property
Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights No. 12 of 2021
Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights No. 29 of 2015
Internet:
Hukum Online, “Passing Off”, https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/passing-off-cl273/, accessed on August 10, 2023
Hukum Online, “Jika Ada Sengketa, Ini Tanggung Jawab DJKI Atas Merek Terdaftar”, https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/jika-ada-sengketa-ini-tanggung-jawab-djki-atas-merek-terdaftar-lt6310586d8c439/, accessed on October 10, 2023
Other:
Decision Number 51/Pdt.Sus/Merek/2021/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst
Supreme Court Decision Number 836K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2022.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/ldj.6.1.94-110
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Law Development Journal has been indexed in: