Legal and Institutional Barriers to Digital Innovation in Local Government
Abstract
Digital transformation is widely promoted as a pathway to more efficient, integrated, and accountable public service delivery. Yet in many local governments, digital reform produces visible administrative change without fundamentally altering how services are organized and delivered. This article examines why digital service innovation remains shallow at the subnational level despite strong national reform pressures. Drawing on a qualitative multiple-case study of selected local governments in West Java, Indonesia, the study investigates how digital reform is translated into everyday bureaucratic practice. Document analysis covered local regulations, service SOPs, SPBE evaluation reports, digital transformation plans, internal monitoring documents, meeting records, and innovation-related materials. Fieldwork was conducted from May to October 2025, generating 22 interviews and reviewing 32 documents across the three cases. The findings show that shallow digital transformation is produced by the interaction of institutional inertia, bureaucratic resistance, fragmented coordination, parallel manual-digital practices, and leadership discontinuity. Rather than generating substantive service redesign, these conditions encourage local governments to prioritize administratively visible forms of compliance, including applications, dashboards, and reports. The article introduces compliance theatre, explaining how digital reform prioritizes administrative legitimacy over substantive change. The article contributes to highlighting organizational barriers and the need to evaluate actual use, integration, and service experience.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agostino, Deborah, Michela Arnaboldi, and Melisa Diaz Lema., New development: COVID-19 as an accelerator of digital transformation in public service delivery. Public Money & Management Vol.41, no.1, 2021; https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1764206;
AlNuaimi, Bader K., Sanjay Kumar Singh, Shuang Ren, Pawan Budhwar, and Dmitriy Vorobyev., Mastering digital transformation: The nexus between leadership, agility, and digital strategy. Journal of Business Research Vol.145, no.1, 2022; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.038;
Ashaye, Olusoyi Richard, and Zahir Irani., The role of stakeholders in the effective use of e-government resources in public services. International Journal of Information Management Vol.49, no.1, 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.016;
Banerjee, Abhijit, Esther Duflo, Clement Imbert, Santhosh Mathew, and Rohini Pande., E-governance, accountability, and leakage in public programs: Experimental evidence from a financial management reform in India. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Vol.12, no.4, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20180302;
Braun, Virginia, Victoria Clarke, Elicia Boulton, Louise Davey, and Charlotte McEvoy., The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology Vol.24, no.6, 2021; https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550;
Brown, Louise, and Stephen P. Osborne. Risk and innovation: Towards a framework for risk governance in public services. Public Management Review Vol.15, no.2, 2013; https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.707681;
Bunduchi, Raluca, Aizhan Tursunbayeva, and Claudia Pagliari., Coping with institutional complexity: Intersecting logics and dissonant visions in a nation-wide healthcare IT implementation project. Information Technology & People Vol.33, no.1, 2020; https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-06-2018-0282;
Chen, Can, and Milena I. Neshkova., The effect of fiscal transparency on corruption: A panel cross-country analysis. Public Administration Vol.98, no.1, 2020; https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12638;
Cinar, Emre, Paul Trott, and Christopher Simms. A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process. Public management review Vol.21, no.2 2019; https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1473477;
Cordella, Antonio, and Andrea Paletti., Government as a platform, orchestration, and public value creation: The Italian case. Government Information Quarterly Vol.36, no.4, 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.004;
Distel, Bettina, and Ida Lindgren., A matter of perspective: Conceptualizing the role of citizens in E-government based on value positions. Government Information Quarterly Vol.40, no.4, 2023, 101837; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101837;
Dwivedi, Yogesh K., D. Laurie Hughes, Crispin Coombs, Ioanna Constantiou, Yanqing Duan, John S. Edwards, Babita Gupta et al., Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on information management research and practice: Transforming education, work and life. International Journal of Information Management Vol.55, 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102211;
Dwivedi, Yogesh K., Laurie Hughes, Elvira Ismagilova, Gert Aarts, Crispin Coombs, Tom Crick, Yanqing Duan et al., Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management Vol.57, 2021; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002;
Elgohary, Esam, and Reham Abdelazyz., The impact of employees' resistance to change on implementing e-government systems: An empirical study in Egypt. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries Vol.86, no.6, 2020; https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12139;
Enang, Iniobong, Darinka Asenova, and Stephen J. Bailey., Identifying influencing factors of sustainable public service transformation: A systematic literature review. International Review of Administrative Sciences Vol.88, no.1, 2022; https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852319896399;
Eom, Seok-Jin, and Jooho Lee., Digital government transformation in turbulent times: Responses, challenges, and future direction. Government Information Quarterly Vol.39, no.2, 2022; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101690;
Epstein, Ben., Two decades of e-government diffusion among local governments in the United States. Government Information Quarterly Vol.39, no.2, 2022; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101665;
Feeney, Mary K., Federica Fusi, Leonor Camarena, and Fengxiu Zhang., Towards more digital cities? Change in technology use and perceptions across small and medium-sized US cities. Local Government Studies Vol.46, no.5, 2020; https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2019.1690993;
Frinaldi, Aldri, Boni Saputra, Muhamad Ali Embi, Dedi Kusuma Habibie, and Fenni Hashanah., Mediation effect of job satisfaction: Work motivation and e-government on service quality in the government of Aceh Singkil, Indonesia. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs Vol.9, no.3, 2023; https://doi.org/10.20899/jpna.9.3.317-337;
Gasco-Hernandez, Mila, Greta Nasi, Maria Cucciniello, and Alexander M. Hiedemann., The role of organizational capacity to foster digital transformation in local governments: The case of three European smart cities. Urban Governance Vol.2, no.2, 2022; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2022.06.005;
Glyptis, Loukas, Michael Christofi, Demetris Vrontis, Manlio Del Giudice, Salomi Dimitriou, and Panayiota Michael., E-Government implementation challenges in small countries: The project manager's perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change Vol.152, 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119880;
Gong, Yiwei, Jun Yang, and Xiaojie Shi., Towards a comprehensive understanding of digital transformation in government: Analysis of flexibility and enterprise architecture. Government Information Quarterly Vol.37, no.3, 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101487;
Hartley, Jean, Alessandro Sancino, Mark Bennister, and Sandra L. Resodihardjo., Leadership for public value: Political astuteness as a conceptual link. Public Administration Vol.97, no.2, 2019; https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12597;
Haug, Nathalie, Sorin Dan, and Ines Mergel., Digitally-induced change in the public sector: A systematic review and research agenda. Public Management Review Vol.26, no.7, 2024; https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2234917;
Heeks, Richard., Examining “digital development”: The shape of the issue, gaps in current research, and routes forward. Information Technology for Development Vol.25, no.3, 2019; https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2019.1586527;
Kadir, Adies, Gunarto, Abdullah Al-Monzur Hussain, Mohammad Abu Taher. Measuring the consistency of Pancasila rule of law implementation in ensuring judicial independence in Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Vol.41, no.2, 2025; http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jh.v41i2.45933;
Khan, Anupriya, Satish Krishnan, and Amandeep Dhir., Electronic government and corruption: Systematic literature review, framework, and agenda for future research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change Vol.167, 2021; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120737;
Mardhiah, Ainal, Rizanizarli Rizanizarli, Iskandar A. Gani, Sri Walny Rahayu, and Mohammad Nasr Khater. The Femicide in Indonesia: Critical Analysis and Innovative Legal Reconstruction. Jurnal Hukum Vol.42, no.1, 2026; http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jh.v42i1.45735;
Marienfeldt, Justine, Liz Marla Wehmeier, and Sabine Kuhlmann., Top-down or bottom-up digital transformation? A comparison of institutional changes and outcomes. Public Money & Management Vol.45, no.5, 2025; https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2024.2365351;
Meijer, Albert., Public innovation capacity: Developing and testing a self-assessment survey instrument. International Journal of Public Administration Vol.42, no.8, 2021; https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1712300;
Mergel, Ines, Helen Dickinson, Jari Stenvall, and Mila Gasco., Implementing AI in the public sector. Public Management Review, 2024; https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2231950;
Mergel, Ines, Noella Edelmann, and Nathalie Haug., Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly Vol.36, no.4, 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002;
Nagel, Maximilian L., The challenge of balancing innovation and tradition in the public sector: The role of street-level bureaucrats in digital transformation. Administration & Society Vol.57, no.1, 2025; https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997241296100;
Neumann, Oliver, Pascale-Catherine Kirklies, and Carina Schott., Adopting agile in government: A comparative case study. Public Management Review Vol.26, no.12, 2024; https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2117273;
Newman, Joshua, Michael Mintrom, and Deirdre O'Neill., Digital technologies, artificial intelligence, and bureaucratic transformation. Futures Vol.136, 2022; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102886;
Nielsen, Jeppe Agger, Kasper Trolle Elmholdt, and Mette Strange Noesgaard., Leading digital transformation: A narrative perspective. Public Administration Review Vol.84, no.4, 2024; https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13721;
Noesgaard, Mette Strange, Jeppe Agger Nielsen, Tina Blegind Jensen, and Lars Mathiassen., Same but different: Variations in reactions to digital transformation within an organizational field. Journal of the Association for Information Systems Vol.24, no.1, 2023; https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00765;
Nurmandi, Achmad, Hasse Jubba, Zuly Qodir, Eko Priyo Purnomo, and Misran., Digital political parties in Indonesia: A comparative review of Indonesian political parties’ digital activities. Journal of Information Technology & Politics Vol.18, no.2, 2021; https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2020.1840708;
Priyono, Anjar, Abdul Moin, and Vera Nur Aini Oktaviani Putri., Identifying digital transformation paths in the business model of SMEs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity Vol.6, no.4, 2020; https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040104;
Purnomo, Eko Priyo, Ramdani Ramdani, Ahmad Suleiman, Nurmandi, A., and Zuly Qodir., E-government implementation and institutional factors in Indonesian local government: A multi-case analysis. Journal of Information Technology & Politics Vol.19, no.2, 2022; https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2021.1987897;
Sa’diyah, Nur Khalimatus, Raden Besse Kartoningrat, and Umi Enggarsasi. Toward a Victim-Oriented Digital Justice Model: Legal Protection for Personal Data Misuse Under the Personal Data Protection Law. Jurnal Hukum Vol.42, no.2, 2026; http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jh.v42i2.48829;
Setiawan, Dani, Setiawan, H. A., and Nugroho, R. D., Factors influencing e-government implementation in local government of Indonesia. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Vol.12, no.3, 2022; https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v12i3.pp2718-2726;
Sivarajah, Uthayasankar, Vishanth Weerakkody, Paul Waller, Habin Lee, Zahir Irani, Youngseok Choi, Rebecca Morgan, and Yuri Glikman., The role of e-participation and open data in evidence-based policy decision making in local government. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce Vol.26, no.1-2, 2016; https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2020.1748437;
Twizeyimana, Jean Damascene, and Annika Andersson., The public value of E-Government–A literature review. Government Information Quarterly Vol.36, no.2, 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001;
Vishanth, Weerakkody, Zahir Irani, Kawal Kapoor, Uthayasankar Sivarajah, and Yogesh K. Dwivedi., A meta-analysis of empirical research on electronic government adoption. Journal of Enterprise Information Management Vol.32, no.3, 2019; https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-04-2018-0081;
Wilson, Christopher, and Ines Mergel., Overcoming barriers to digital government: Mapping the strategies of digital champions. Government Information Quarterly Vol.39, no.2, 2022; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101681;
Wirtz, Bernd W., Jan C. Weyerer, and Carolin Geyer., Artificial intelligence and the public sector-applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration Vol.42, no.7, 2019; https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jh.v42i4.53178
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Hukum Indexed by :
![]() | Jurnal Hukum | |
| Faculty of Law, Unissula | Copyright of Jurnal Hukum | |
| Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk, | ISSN 1412-2723 ( Print )e-ISSN 2723-6668 ( Online ) | |
| Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112 |


