Reconstruction of the Guilt Concept in the 2023 Indonesian Criminal Code from a Neurolaw Perspective

Kartono Kartono, Sophan Y. Warnasouda, Sri Humana Lagustiani, Soeryaniati Koesoemo, Sri Hastuti, J. Aminullah Alwahdy, Ulang Mangun Sosiawan, Bhanu Prakash Nunna

Abstract


This study examines the reconstruction of the guilt concept in the 2023 Indonesian Criminal Code through a neurolaw perspective. Employing doctrinal legal research with an interdisciplinary approach, it analyzes Law Number 1/2023, neurolaw publications from international journals, and recent Supreme Court decisions (2023–2025) through thematic and conceptual analysis. The findings reveal three principal issues. First, Articles 17, 35, 38, and 39 contain progressive provisions but lack neuroscientific specificity, creating interpretive gaps: undefined “ability” (Article 17), unspecified “impairment” threshold (Article 35), and exclusive reliance on traditional psychiatric categories (Articles 38 and 39). Second, analysis of court decisions reveals significant interpretive disparity in cases involving mentally disordered defendants. Neuroscientific evidence demonstrates that prefrontal cortex impairments compromise moral decision-making and impulse control, supporting a spectrum-based understanding of guilt. Third, integrating neurolaw would provide objective criteria for assessing cognitive and volitional capacity across the graded framework of Articles 38 and 39. This study is the first to systematically integrate international neurolaw literature with doctrinal analysis of the 2023 Criminal Code, offering interpretative guidance for key articles and an implementation roadmap for Indonesian criminal justice aligned with the ultimum remedium principle.


Keywords


Criminal Guilt; Criminal Responsibility; Forensic Neuroscience; Indonesian Criminal Code; Neurolaw.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Crofts, Thomas, Louise Kennefick, and Arlie Loughnan, eds. The Routledge international handbook of criminal responsibility. Routledge, Routledge, 2024;

Dubber, Markus D., The dual penal state: the crisis of criminal law in comparative-historical perspective. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2018;

Dybowski, Maciej, Weronika Dzięgielewska, and Wojciech Rzepiński., Practice Theory and Law. Oxfordshire, Taylor & Francis, 2025;

A Vincent, Nicole., Neurolaw and direct brain interventions. Criminal law and philosophy Vol.8, no.1, 2014; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-012-9164-y;

Adhari, Ade., Criminal Liability of Defendants with Bipolar Disorder from the Perspective of Justice in Supreme Court Decision No. 1209 K/Pid. Sus/2023. JIHK Vol.7, no.2, 2026; https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v7i2.359;

Adrianto, Iwan., Konsep Penerapan Restoratif Justice Oleh Penyidik Kepolisian Dalam Pasal Pasal KUHP Baru. Janaloka Vol.2, no.2, 2023;

Agustiawan, M. Hendri, Pujiyono Pujiyono, and Umi Rozah., Usia Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Anak dalam Perspektif Neurolaw. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan Vol.4, no.2, 2023; https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.v4i2.18206;

Alimardani, Armin, and Jason Chin., Neurolaw in Australia: the use of neuroscience in Australian criminal proceedings. Neuroethics Vol.12, no.3, 2019; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-018-09395-z;

Alimardani, Armin., Neuroscience, criminal responsibility and sentencing in an islamic country: Iran. Journal of Law and the Biosciences Vol.5, no.3, 2018; https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsy024;

Beecher-Monas, Erica, and Edgar García-Rill., Actus Reus, Mens Rea, and Brain Science: What Do Volition and Intent Really Mean? Kentucky Law Journal Vol.106, no.2, 2017;

Catley, Paul, and Lisa Claydon., The use of neuroscientific evidence in the courtroom by those accused of criminal offenses in England and Wales. Journal of Law and the Biosciences Vol.2, no.3, 2015; 510-549. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsv025;

Cholidin, Achmad, Zico Junius Fernando, and Mikhael Feka., Utilization of Neuroimaging in Criminal Justice: Unveiling Truth Through Brain Technology. IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) Vol.9, no.2; 2024;

Fernando, Zico Junius, Agusalim Agusalim, Ria Anggraeni Utami, Hamonangan Albariansyah, and Rian Sacipto., Neurolaw: A Concept in Development and Enforcement of Criminal Law in Indonesia. Jurnal Legalitas Vol.7, no.1, 2025; https://doi.org/10.37905/jalrev.v7i1.24144;

Fernando, Zico Junius, Agusalim Agusalim, Ria Anggraeni Utami, Hamonangan Albariansyah, and Rian Sacipto., Neurolaw: A Concept in Development and Enforcement of Criminal Law in Indonesia. Jambura Law Review Vol.7, no.1, 2025; https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v7i1.24144;

Fernando, Zico Junius, Aris Hardinanto, Muchlas Rastra Samara Muksin, Solehuddin Solehuddin, and Putra Perdana Ahmad Saifulloh., Integrating Neurolaw and Principles of Islamic Law: A Scientific Ethical Model of Criminal Responsibility. Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol.23, no.1, 2025; https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi.v23i1.09;

Fernando, Zico Junius, Rosmanila, Laily Ratna, Achmad Cholidin, and Bhanu Prakash Nunna., The Role of Neuroprediction and Artificial Intelligence in the Future of Criminal Procedure Support Science: A New Era in Neuroscience and Criminal Justice. Yuridika Vol.38, no.3, 2023; 593-620. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i3.46104;

Gazzaniga, Michael S., Cognitive Neuroscience and the Law. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Vol.49, no.6, 2023;

Goodenough, Oliver R., and Micaela Tucker., Law and cognitive neuroscience. Annual review of law and social science Vol.6, no.1, 2010;

Goodenough, Oliver R., and Micaela Tucker., Law and Cognitive Neuroscience: An Introduction. Annual Review of Law and Social Science Vol.17, no.6, 2021; https://doi.org/10.1146/lawsocsci.807;

Greely, Henry T., and Nita A. Farahany., Neuroscience and the criminal justice system. Annual Review of Criminology Vol.2, no.1, 2019; https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024433;

Hirstein, William, and Katrina Sifferd., The legal self: Executive processes and legal theory.” Consciousness and Cognition Vol.20, no.1, 2011; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.10.007;

Hutchinson, Terry, and Nigel Duncan., Defining and describing what we do: doctrinal legal research. Deakin law review Vol.17, no.1, 2012;

Ida, Orintina Vavinta, and Nany Suryawati., Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Dengan Gangguan Kejiwaan Menurut Ketentuan Hukum Positif. Binamulia Hukum Vol.12, no.2, 2023; https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v12i2.620;

Ismanto, Suprapto., Rethinking the Criminal Responsibility of Minors: A Comparative and Interdisciplinary Analysis. DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol.24, no.1, 2026; https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v24i1.14927;

Jones, Owen D., and René Marois., Law and Neuroscience: A State of the Art. Journal of Law and the Biosciences Vol.9, no.1, 2022; 30-58. https://doi.org/9.1/JNEUROSCI.3254-13.2022;

Kadir, Adies., Gunarto, Suwarno, and Md Adnan Kabir. Judicial Power and Judges’ Status in Indonesia’s Constitutional Framework. Jurnal Hukum Vol.41, no.1, 2025; https://doi.org/10.26532/jh.v41i1.45197;

Kadir, Zul Khaidir., Neurokriminologi dan Ilusi Kesengajaan: Mengapa Bukti Neurologis Tidak Dapat Menggantikan Mens Rea. Crossroad Research Journal Vol.2, no.5, 2025;

Kan, Celal Hakan., The examination of neuroscientific evidence in the criminal trial process: The importance of collaboration between criminal law and neuroscience. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences/Uluslararasi Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Vol.16, no.59, 2025; DOI: 10.70736/ijoess.592;

Karo, Rizky Karo., Interpretasi hakim dan rasa keadilan masyarakat. Jurnal Yudisial Vol.16, no.3, 2023; https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v16i3.652;

Khalid, Zain, Ruby Lee, and Barry W. Wall., The use of neurobiological evidence in sentencing mitigation. Behavioral Sciences & the Law Vol.42, no.2, 2024; https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2645;

Khasanah, Dian Ratu Ayu Uswatun, and Anggita Doramia Lumbanraja., Perkembangan interpretasi hukum oleh hakim di Indonesia dalam dominasi tradisi civil law system. Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol.7, no.2, 2022; 232-245;

Martell, Daniel A., Neuroscience and the law: Philosophical differences and practical constraints. Behavioral sciences & the law Vol.27, no.2, 2009;

Mishra, Pragya., Neuroscientific paradigms and their implications for jurisprudential practice: A comparative analysis. Athens JL Vol.10, 2024;

Nasution, Jumanah, Muhammad Syukri Albani Nasution, and Ramadhan Syahmedi Siregar., Mental Disability and Criminal Justice in Indonesia: A Legal and Informational Literacy Approach Based on Maqashid Al-Syari’ah. JIPI: Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi Vol.10, no.1, 2025; https://dx.doi.org/10.30829/jipi.v10i1.24167;

Saptama, Damai Alan, Aime Renata Putri, Nobella Indradjaja, and Chamdani Chamdani., Neurohukum Dan Batas Usia Anak Dalam Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Wijaya Putra Law Review Vol.3, no.1, 2024; https://doi.org/10.38156/wplr.v3i1.183;

Sari, Fitri Kartika, Kusaimah Kusaimah, and Salman Salman., Perlindungan Hukum Hak Pilih Penyandang Disabilitas Mental dalam Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia. Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara Dan Politik Islam Vol.10, no.2, 2023; https://doi.org/10.32505/politica.v10i2.7516;

Snead, O. Carter., Neuroethics and the Future of Justice. Daedalus Vol.150, no.4, 2021;

Sörman, Karolina, Jennifer Cox, Charlotte Eklund Rimsten, Marissa Stanziani, Claes Lernestedt, Marianne Kristiansson, and Katarina Howner., Perceptions of mental health conditions in criminal cases: A survey study involving Swedish lay judges. Criminal Justice and Behavior Vol.47, no.6, 2020; https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820910774;

Suartha, I. Dewa Made, and Jared Ivory., Corporate crime liability: Beyond rule reform on Indonesia criminal policy. Focus Journal Law Review Vol.4, no.2, 2024;

Syarifullah, Muhammad, Rini Fathonah, and Muhammad Farid., Analisis Implikasi Yuridis Terhadap Pengaturan Pidana Denda Dalam Kuhp Nasional: Tantangan Dan Dampak Terhadap Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Media Akademik Vol.3, no.9, 2025; https://doi.org/10.62281/ez6zj376;

Welsh, Brandon C., Steven N. Zane, and Daniel P. Mears., Evidence-based policy in a new era of crime and violence prevention and social justice. Aggression and Violent Behavior Vol.77, 2024; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2024.101940;

Patunisa, Maharani., Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Yang Mengidap Skizofrenia Paranoid (Studi Putusan Nomor 105/Pid. B/2023/Pn. Gdt). PhD diss., Universitas Sumatera Utara, 2025.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jh.v42i1.48576

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0


Jurnal Hukum Indexed by :

google_scholar onesearch garuda crosref Base sinta sinta scopus
Jurnal Hukum
   
Faculty of Law, UnissulaCopyright of Jurnal Hukum
Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk,ISSN 1412-2723 ( Print )e-ISSN 2723-6668 ( Online )
Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112